BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2029


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2029 (Dahle, et al.)


          As Amended  May 27, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Natural         |9-0  |Williams, Jones,      |                    |
          |Resources       |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Cristina Garcia,      |                    |
          |                |     |Gomez, Hadley,        |                    |
          |                |     |Harper, McCarty,      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Mark Stone, Wood      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |








                                                                    AB 2029


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Extends the Forest Fire Prevention Pilot Project  
          (Pilot) from January 1, 2018 to January 1, 2023, and expands it  
          by allowing road construction and larger trees to be harvested  
          in forest land without a timber harvest permit (THP).


          EXISTING LAW, pursuant to the Z'Berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act  
          (FPA):


          1)Prohibits timber operations unless a THP has been prepared by  
            a registered professional forester (Forester) and approved by  
            the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE).   
            Considers a THP the functional equivalent of an environmental  
            impact report (EIR) under the California Environmental Quality  
            Act (CEQA).
          2)Requires a THP to contain a description of the location of the  
            planned harvest, the harvest method, measures to avoid  
            excessive erosion, timeframe of operations, and other  
            information required by forest practice rules (FPR) adopted by  
            the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection (Board).


          3)Exempts various tree removal activities from THPs, including  
            Christmas tree farms, rights-of-way for utility lines,  
            conversions of less than three acres, fire prevention,  
            defensible space, and dead, dying and diseased trees.   
            Requires ministerial permits for certain exemptions, called a  
            notice of exemption (NOE), and subjects projects to inspection  
            by CAL FIRE.


          4)Creates an exemption from THP known as the Pilot Exemption.   








                                                                    AB 2029


                                                                    Page  3





            Limits harvesting under the exemption to the following:


             a)   Only trees less than 24 inches in stump diameter;


             b)   Tree harvesting must decrease fuel continuity and  
               increase quadratic mean diameter of the stand;


             c)   No new road construction or reconstruction;


             d)   No known sites of rare, threatened, or endangered plants  
               or animals will be disturbed, threatened, or damaged; and,


             e)   The activates are limited to the Sierra Nevada Region or  
               the Counties of Del Norte, Humboldt, Mendocino, Modoc,  
               Sonoma, Siskiyou, or Trinity.


          5)Requires CAL FIRE to maintain records regarding the use of  
            exemptions granted in order to evaluate the impact of the  
            exemptions on fuel reduction and natural resources in areas  
            where an exemption has been used.


          6)Requires CAL FIRE to conduct an onsite inspection to determine  
            compliance with the Pilot.


          7)Sunsets the Pilot three years after the effective date of  
            regulations adopted by the Board (January 1, 2018).


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriation  
          Committee:









                                                                    AB 2029


                                                                    Page  4






          1)Increased personnel costs and workload for CAL FIRE to perform  
            on-sight inspections and monitor projects including the  
            evaluation of roads for proper location, construction and  
            maintenance.  CAL FIRE estimates they will require an  
            additional three Forester I positions at an annual cost of  
            $650,000 (Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund). 
          2)Potential one-time costs in the $200,000 range for initial  
            hiring and equipment purchases. (Timber Regulation and Forest  
            Restoration Fund).


          COMMENTS:  


          1)Background.  California has regulated forest practices on  
            private lands since at least 1945.  The Legislature assessed  
            the effectiveness of this approach and concluded that the  
            industry could not be relied on to ensure proper water  
            quality, forest health, and adequate timber supply.  In 1957,  
            the state Senate Interim Committee on Soil and Beach Erosion  
            found that timber harvesting and logging road construction  
            contributed to stream erosion and resultant impacts to fish  
            populations.  In 1962, the Assembly Interim Committee on  
            Natural Resources, Planning, and Public Works concluded that  
            timber regulations were inadequately enforced, leading to  
            deleterious effects on water quality, fishing, and recreation.  
             In 1967, after three years of study, the Assembly  
            Subcommittee on Forest Practices and Watershed Management  
            recommended that the basic state policy governing forest  
            practices should be broadened and strengthened.  These  
            collective findings, coupled with a 1971 report that  
            identified logging as a primary factor in an 80% decline of  
            salmon and steelhead populations, motivated the Legislature to  
            pass the FPA in 1973.  The FPA requires THPs, which are a  
            complex discretionary permit that acts as an EIR under CEQA. 


            AB 1492 (Budget Committee), Chapter 289, Statutes of 2012,  








                                                                    AB 2029


                                                                    Page  5





            extended the life of THPs from three years to five years with  
            an option for a two-year extension.  AB 1492 also shifted  
            state fees for a THP to an assessment on all lumber products  
            to fund agency review.  However, a THP can still cost  
            landowners tens of thousands of dollars to prepare.








          2)Author's statement: 


               The Forest Fire Prevention Pilot Program regulations took  
               effect January 2015.  Since then 2087 acres have been  
               treated.  During this time a few issues have come up in  
               regards to access, counties eligible, diameter and the  
               sunset.  We propose allowing a temporary access road up  
               to 600 feet in order to allow access to hard to reach  
               stands in order to be able to treat more acres.  We  
               realized in doing AB 744 we neglected to capture complete  
               counties so we want to correct this by including the  
               whole county of the existing list, no new counties are  
               being added.  Another issue has come up in regards to  
               older stands.  These stands have larger trees and are  
               much more dense.  In order to be able to utilize the  
               exemption and treat more land we would like to see a  
               diameter increase to 28 inches.  This will allow older  
               stands to be treated while still keeping the overall  
               stand diameter increasing.  In light of these adjustments  
               we want to make, we would like to extend the sunset out  
               another 5 years to 2022 in order to get a more concise  
               accounting of how it's working.


          3)Pilot.  Since 2015, there have been 16 Pilot projects treating  








                                                                    AB 2029


                                                                    Page  6





            the forest to prevent fire with one violation for harvesting  
            trees over 24 inches.  CAL FIRE has not yet evaluated whether  
            the Pilot has been effective at preventing fires.  CAL FIRE  
            has also not been able to demonstrate that overall diameter is  
            increasing on areas using the exemption. As an exemption, CAL  
            FIRE has no ability to work with applicants to ensure projects  
            are strategically located to be most effective in fire  
            prevention.  The exemption has also been used mostly by large  
            timber operators who are in a better positon to afford  
            conducting a THP than small land owners.  Therefore, it is  
            unclear what the value of the Pilot has been.  However, the  
            Pilot has only been in effect for a year and half.  One reason  
            it might not be used more frequently is because of the tree  
            mortality crisis.  Forest land owners may be using the dead,  
            dying, and diseased trees exemption instead because so many  
            trees qualify for it. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092  FN:  
          0003107