BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2048 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 20, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 2048 (Gray) - As Amended April 7, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Health |Vote:|18 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill makes changes to the federally funded State Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) administered by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, and appropriates state funding to support the program. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires OHPD include all federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) located in California in the program's certified AB 2048 Page 2 eligible site list, to strive to maximize the number of applications per grant cycle, and to report to the Legislature on applications and awards. 2)Continuously appropriates $1 million to OSHPD, without regard to fiscal year, to provide state matching funds for the SLRP. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)One-time cost of $1 million GF to provide state matching funds for the program, as appropriated by this bill. 2)Up to $200,000 in one-time costs to OSHPD to update policies, procedures, forms, as well as handle a significant influx of applications (California Health Planning Fund). 3)Ongoing GF cost pressure to continue state funding participation for the SLRP in future years. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. This bill is intended to streamline participation in the SLRP by eliminating burdensome application and renewal requirements for FQHCs and shifting the responsibility to provide matching funds to the state. 2)Background. The SLRP is a federally-funded, state-administered program that provides loan repayment funds of up to $50,000 per service obligation, which is either a full-time two-year or half-time four-year period. Extensions AB 2048 Page 3 to the service obligation are also available. The program includes a matching requirement. Federal rules require states to make available (directly or through donations from public or private entities) non-federal contributions in cash toward SLRP contracts in an amount not less than $1 for each $1 of federal funds provided in the grant. California does not currently provide state funding for the required match; instead, participating clinics provide the match. Thus, a $50,000 award would include $25,000 from the federal grant and $25,000 from the clinic's match. Essentially, providing this benefit costs the clinic an additional $12,500 per year for two years on top of the provider's salary, while the eligible provider receives a tax-free loan repayment award of up to $50,000 over two years. This bill also requires all California FQHCs to be included in the program's "certified eligible list." Currently, OSHPD uses the list to identify sites that are located in areas that are designated as "health professional shortage areas" and that have agreed to provide matching funds. To be on the list, sites must apply and renew every three years. By federal rule, all community clinics meet the "health professional shortage" criteria- and if the program no longer requires clinics to match funds as this bill appears to propose, then allowing automatic eligibility for FQHCs seems reasonable. 3)Comments. While providing state funding would benefit clinics, it does not appear that it would increase the number of loan repayment awards that occur though the program. If state funding simply displaces private funding for the match, the state will pay $1 million for the same overall amount of recruitment and retention benefits that would occur in absence of state funding. If this bill is attempting to change the AB 2048 Page 4 current distribution of funds, rather than increasing the total number of awards, the author could consider alternative ways to do this, or could more clearly specify this intent. Also, it is unclear why the $1 million is continuously appropriated and whether it is intended that the department use this state funding to match federal funding for all recipients, or only for those who could not otherwise afford the match. Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081