BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Senator Ed Hernandez, O.D., Chair BILL NO: AB 2048 --------------------------------------------------------------- |AUTHOR: |Gray | |---------------+-----------------------------------------------| |VERSION: |May 27, 2016 | | | | --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- |HEARING DATE: | June 29, 2016 | | | --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- |CONSULTANT: |Melanie Moreno | --------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT : National Health Service Corps State Loan Repayment Program SUMMARY :1) Requires the Office of Statewide Planning and Development (OSHPD), in its administration of the State Loan Repayment Program, to include all federally qualified health centers located in California on the certified eligible site list. Permits OSHPD to use state funds for purposes of providing required matching funds for the National Health Service Corps State Loan Repayment Program in any year in which funding is appropriated by the annual Budget Act for that purpose. Existing law: Requires OSHPD, in administering the State Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) to strive, whenever feasible, to equitably distribute loan repayment awards between eligible urban and rural program sites, after taking into account the availability of health care services in the communities to be served and the number of individuals to be served in each program site. Requires OSHPD to set a reasonable deadline for when applications are required to be received and requires all eligible applications to be given consideration before any award is granted. This bill: 1)Requires OSHPD to include all federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) located in California in the SLRP's certified eligible site (CES) list. 2)Requires OSHPD to notify all certified eligible sites when the SLRP opens each application cycle and to strive, to the extent possible, to maximize the number of applications received each cycle. AB 2048 (Gray) Page 2 of ? 3)Requires applicants, as part of the initial application process, to agree to provide matching funds in any year that OSHPD does not receive required matching funds in the annual Budget Act, but prohibits OSHPD from requiring applicants and participants to provide matching funds in that case. 4)Requires OSHPD, until January 1, 2021, to submit an annual report, as specified, to the Senate and Assembly Committees on Health that includes: a) The number of applications received during the annual application cycle; b) The percentage of applicants that were awarded funding under the program; c) The percentage of applicants that were not awarded funding under the program; and, d) The percentage of funding that went to each geographic region in the state. 5)Permits OSHPD to use state funds for purposes of providing required matching funds for the SLRP in any year in which funding is appropriated by the annual Budget Act for that purpose. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: Up to $200,000 in one-time costs to OSHPD to update policies, procedures, forms, as well as handle a significant influx of applications (California Health Planning Fund). General Fund cost pressure to appropriate state funding for the SLRP in future years PRIOR VOTES : ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Assembly Floor: |80 - 0 | |------------------------------------+----------------------------| |Assembly Appropriations Committee: |20 - 0 | |------------------------------------+----------------------------| |Assembly Health Committee: |18 - 0 | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENTS : AB 2048 (Gray) Page 3 of ? 1)Author's statement. According to the author, the SLRP was created in 1987 to increase and retain the number of primary care physicians, dentists, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and mental and behavioral specialists in health professional shortage areas. While the SLRP is an important program to recruit healthcare professionals to communities in need, FQHCs face burdensome obstacles to participation. Despite their federal designation, each FQHC is required to submit an application to be placed on the list of CES before applicants from their facility may be considered for loan repayment. In addition, FQHCs must renew their application every three years to continue participation in the SLRP. Finally, federal SLRP dollars require a state match, but, while other states provide this match themselves, California has shifted the cost onto the health centers. California receives just $1 million in federal funding annually, but many small and medium size health centers that cannot afford to provide matching funds are precluded from SLRP participation. As a result of these requirements, less than one third of the health centers in the state are currently listed on the CES. 2)FQHCs. As noted by the author, FQHCs serve a significant portion of the uninsured and underinsured in California. They are open-door providers that treat patients on a sliding scale fee structure and make their services available regardless of a patient's ability to pay. There are approximately 600 FQHCs in California, all of which are either non-profit community clinics or government entities. Community clinics and health centers provide health care to 14% of Californians. This figure is even higher in rural or remote areas that struggle to attract and retain health care providers. 3)The California State Loan Repayment Program. According to the National Health Services Corp, SLRP is a federally-funded grant program to states and territories that provides cost-sharing grants to assist them in operating their own state educational loan repayment programs for primary care providers working in Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) within their state. SLRP does not provide loan repayment directly to individual health professionals. SLRP requires matching funds from the state applicant and administration of the program by a state agency. States must agree to make available (directly or through donations from public or private entities) non-federal contributions in cash toward SLRP contracts. States are not required to include all AB 2048 (Gray) Page 4 of ? eligible disciplines in their program, but eligible professions include: physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, dental professionals, mental health professionals, registered nurses, and pharmacists. SLRP authorizes repayment of qualified educational loans for eligible primary health care professionals, who must commit to an initial two year full-time or four year half-time service agreement to provide direct patient care in a primary, dental, or mental health HPSA. In California, in order for a site to be eligible to host SLRP providers, it must: a) Be located in a federally designated HPSA; b) Be a public or private, not-for-profit, out-patient facility; c) Match the SLRP award, on a dollar-for-dollar basis; d) Pay the provider a prevailing wage; and, e) Provide services on a free or reduced fee schedule basis to individuals at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. The purpose of the CES list is to identify those sites that are located in a HPSA and agree to match the SLRP award amount. When a site submits a CES application, SLRP determines if the site is located in a HPSA, if the site is in Northern, Central, or Southern California, and if it is in a Rural, Urban, or Frontier area. (A "Frontier area" by federal definition, is an area with population density of less than 11 persons per square mile). HPSA site designations are valid for three years; then they must be recertified by SLRP to ensure they are still located in a HPSA. If a site loses its HPSA designation, it is no longer an eligible site. FQHCs are automatically approved HPSA designations through the NHSC. However, SLRP does not currently automatically approve all FQHCs; if SLRP did, it would be assuming all FQHCs could match the SLRP award amount. SLRP receives $1 million per grant year. The number of awards given out depends upon how many applications are received. Because the purpose of SLRP is to recruit and retain high quality healthcare professionals working in HPSAs, applicants requesting an extension usually receive an award. The table below shows funding, applicant, and award amounts: ------------------------------------------------------------ |Year |Available |# |# Awarded |New |Extension | AB 2048 (Gray) Page 5 of ? | |Funding |Applicants| |Applicants|Applicants| | | | | | Awarded | Awarded | |-----+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------| |2011 |$1M |51 |45 |Unknown |Unknown | |-----+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------| |2012 |$1M |53 |50 |Unknown |Unknown | |-----+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------| |2013 |$949,000* |112 |44 |30 |14 | |-----+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------| |2014 |$1M |134 |70 |36 |34 | |-----+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------| |2015 |$1M |113 |63 |41 |22 | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------ *2013 funding was reduced due to Federal Sequester The table below shows the areas of the state where current awarded providers are practicing: ------------------------------------------------------------ | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ------------------------------------------------------------ |---------+--------+----------+--------+---------+-----------| |Central |Frontier|Central |Frontier|Central | Frontier | | 13 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 26 | 0 | |---------+--------+----------+--------+---------+-----------| |Northern |Rural |Northern |Rural |Northern | Rural | | 10 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 12 | 15 | |---------+--------+----------+--------+---------+-----------| |Southern |Urban |Southern |Urban |Southern | Urban | | 21 | 33 | 32 |49 | 25 | 48 | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------ 4)SLRP participation. Currently, there are 415 SLRP Certified Eligible Sites: 392 primary care, 165 mental health, and 135 dental health. Four are located in Frontier areas, 140 in Rural areas, and 271 in Urban areas. OSHPD notifies all CES when the application cycle opens up each year. OSHPD/SLRP sends stakeholder announcements, updates the SLRP Website and contacts current awardees (healthcare providers) who are eligible for an extension award. The CES application is open year-round. The provider application cycle is tentatively set for August 1 to October 1 of each year but has varied the last few years due to the implementation of OSHPDs online AB 2048 (Gray) Page 6 of ? application system. 5)Prior legislation. AB 820 (Nakanishi, Chapter 682, Statutes of 2003), requires OSHPD, in administering SLRP, to strive, whenever feasible, to equitably distribute loan repayment awards between urban and rural program sites, after taking into account the availability of health care services in the communities to be served and the number of individuals to be served in each program site. Requires that all eligible applications be given consideration before any award is granted. 6)Support. The California Primary Care Association, Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles, and Redwood Community Health Coalition all support this bill stating that it is a simple, yet effective way to support community health centers ability to recruit and retain providers by strengthening SLRP. The proponents note that at a time when our state's underserved communities are grappling with a severe and growing primary care provider shortage, SLRP increases the number of primary care providers practicing in federally designated HPSAs, however SLRP is currently structured in a way that disincentives participation among FQHCs who serve low-income and uninsured communities. The supporters conclude that this bill will address these challenges by streamlining participation in the SLRP through automatic enrollment for FQHCs as CES. The Association of California Healthcare Districts (ACHD) notes that as the demand for physicians rises with the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it is of utmost importance that California be innovative in addressing physician shortage issues in underserved areas, where many FQHC's operate. ACHD also states, by appropriating the necessary funds for the SLRP, California will continue to promote access to healthcare in the most underserved areas of the state. SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION : Support: Central Valley Health Health Network (sponsor) APLA Health & Wellness Association of California Healthcare Districts California Primary Care Association Coalition of Orange County Community Health Centers Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County Community Clinic Consortium Family Health Centers of San Diego AB 2048 (Gray) Page 7 of ? Health Alliance of Northern California La Clinica de La Raza Los Angeles LGBT Center Neighborhood Healthcare North Coast Clinics Network Northeast Valley Health Corporation Sacramento Native American Health Center, Inc. San Ysidro Health Center South Central Family Health Center White Memorial Community Health Center Oppose: None Received -- END --