BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2048| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 2048 Author: Gray (D), et al. Amended: 8/15/16 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 8-0, 6/29/16 AYES: Hernandez, Nguyen, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Nielsen, Pan, Roth NO VOTE RECORDED: Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 8/11/16 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza, Nielsen ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 80-0, 6/1/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: National Health Service Corps State Loan Repayment Program SOURCE: Central Valley Health Network DIGEST: This bill requires the Office of Statewide Planning and Development (OSHPD), in its administration of the State Loan Repayment Program (SLRP), to include all federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) located in California on the certified eligible site (CES) list. This bill permits OSHPD to use state funds for purposes of providing required matching funds for the National Health Service Corps State Loan Repayment Program in any year in which funding is appropriated by the annual Budget Act for that purpose. ANALYSIS: Existing law requires OSHPD, in administering SLRP to AB 2048 Page 2 strive, whenever feasible, to equitably distribute loan repayment awards between eligible urban and rural program sites, after taking into account the availability of health care services in the communities to be served and the number of individuals to be served in each program site. Requires OSHPD to set a reasonable deadline for when applications are required to be received and requires all eligible applications to be given consideration before any award is granted. This bill: 1)Requires OSHPD to include all FQHCs located in California in the SLRP's CES list. 2)Requires OSHPD to notify all CESs when the SLRP opens each application cycle and to strive, to the extent possible, to maximize the number of applications received each cycle. 3)Requires applicants, as part of the applicant's initial application, to agree to provide matching funds. Comments 1)Author's statement. According to the author, the SLRP was created in 1987 to increase and retain the number of primary care physicians, dentists, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and mental and behavioral specialists in health professional shortage areas. While the SLRP is an important program to recruit healthcare professionals to communities in need, FQHCs face burdensome obstacles to participation. Despite their federal designation, each FQHC is required to submit an application to be placed on the list of CES before applicants from their facility may be considered for loan repayment. In addition, FQHCs must renew their application every three years to continue participation in the SLRP. Finally, federal SLRP dollars require a state match, but, while other states provide this match themselves, California has shifted the cost onto the health centers. California receives just $1 million in AB 2048 Page 3 federal funding annually, but many small and medium size health centers that cannot afford to provide matching funds are precluded from SLRP participation. As a result of these requirements, less than one third of the health centers in the state are currently listed on the CES. 2)FQHCs. As noted by the author, FQHCs serve a significant portion of the uninsured and underinsured in California. They are open-door providers that treat patients on a sliding scale fee structure and make their services available regardless of a patient's ability to pay. There are approximately 600 FQHCs in California, all of which are either non-profit community clinics or government entities. Community clinics and health centers provide health care to 14% of Californians. This figure is even higher in rural or remote areas that struggle to attract and retain health care providers. 3)The California State Loan Repayment Program. According to the National Health Services Corp, SLRP is a federally-funded grant program to states and territories that provides cost-sharing grants to assist them in operating their own state educational loan repayment programs for primary care providers working in Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) within their state. SLRP does not provide loan repayment directly to individual health professionals. SLRP requires matching funds from the state applicant and administration of the program by a state agency. States must agree to make available (directly or through donations from public or private entities) non-federal contributions in cash toward SLRP contracts. States are not required to include all eligible disciplines in their program, but eligible professions include: physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, dental professionals, mental health professionals, registered nurses, and pharmacists. SLRP authorizes repayment of qualified educational loans for eligible primary health care professionals, who must commit to an initial two year full-time or four year half-time service agreement to provide direct patient care in a primary, dental, or mental health HPSA. In California, in order for a site to be eligible to host SLRP providers, it must: AB 2048 Page 4 a) Be located in a federally designated HPSA; b) Be a public or private, not-for-profit, out-patient facility; c) Match the SLRP award, on a dollar-for-dollar basis; d) Pay the provider a prevailing wage; and, e) Provide services on a free or reduced fee schedule basis to individuals at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. The purpose of the CES list is to identify those sites that are located in a HPSA and agree to match the SLRP award amount. When a site submits a CES application, SLRP determines if the site is located in a HPSA, if the site is in Northern, Central, or Southern California, and if it is in a Rural, Urban, or Frontier area. (A "Frontier area" by federal definition, is an area with population density of less than 11 persons per square mile). HPSA site designations are valid for three years; then they must be recertified by SLRP to ensure they are still located in a HPSA. If a site loses its HPSA designation, it is no longer an eligible site. FQHCs are automatically approved HPSA designations through the NHSC. However, SLRP does not currently automatically approve all FQHCs; if SLRP did, it would be assuming all FQHCs could match the SLRP award amount. SLRP receives $1 million per grant year. The number of awards given out depends upon how many applications are received. Because the purpose of SLRP is to recruit and retain high quality healthcare professionals working in HPSAs, applicants requesting an extension usually receive an award. The table below shows funding, applicant, and award amounts: ----------------------------------------------------------- |Year|Available|# |# Awarded |New |Extension | | | Funding |Applicants | |Applicants|Applicants| | | | | | Awarded | Awarded | |----+---------+-----------+----------+----------+----------| |2011|$1M |51 |45 |Unknown |Unknown | | | | | | | | |----+---------+-----------+----------+----------+----------| AB 2048 Page 5 |2012|$1M |53 |50 |Unknown |Unknown | | | | | | | | |----+---------+-----------+----------+----------+----------| |2013|$949,000*|112 |44 |30 |14 | | | | | | | | |----+---------+-----------+----------+----------+----------| |2014|$1M |134 |70 |36 |34 | | | | | | | | |----+---------+-----------+----------+----------+----------| |2015|$1M |113 |63 |41 |22 | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------- *2013 funding was reduced due to Federal Sequester The table below shows the areas of the state where current awarded providers are practicing: ----------------------------------------------------------- | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ----------------------------------------------------------- |--------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+------------| |Central |Frontie|Central |Frontie|Central |Frontier | | 13 |r 0 | 28 |r 0 | 26 |0 | |--------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+------------| |Northern|Rural |Northern |Rural |Northern |Rural | | 10 | 11 | 10 | 21 |12 |15 | |--------+-------+-----------+-------+----------+------------| |Southern|Urban |Southern |Urban |Southern |Urban | | 21 | 33 | 32 | 49 |25 |48 | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------ 4)SLRP participation. Currently, there are 415 SLRP CESs: 392 primary care, 165 mental health, and 135 dental health. Four are located in Frontier areas, 140 in Rural areas, and 271 in Urban areas. OSHPD notifies all CES when the application cycle opens up each year. OSHPD/SLRP sends stakeholder announcements, updates the SLRP Web site and contacts current awardees (healthcare providers) who are eligible for an extension award. The CES application is open year-round. The provider application cycle is tentatively set for August 1 to October 1 of each year but has varied the last few years due AB 2048 Page 6 to the implementation of OSHPDs online application system. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, no significant fiscal impact is anticipated by automatically making all FQHCs eligible to participate. Automatically putting all FQHCs on the eligible list does not guarantee any funding from the state, it only makes them automatically eligible to participate, providing they meet other program requirements. SUPPORT: (Verified8/15/16) Central Valley Health Network (source) APLA Health & Wellness Association of California Healthcare Districts California Primary Care Association Coalition of Orange County Community Health Centers Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County Community Clinic Consortium Family Health Centers of San Diego Health Alliance of Northern California La Clinica de La Raza Los Angeles LGBT Center Neighborhood Healthcare North Coast Clinics Network Northeast Valley Health Corporation Sacramento Native American Health Center, Inc. San Ysidro Health Center South Central Family Health Center White Memorial Community Health Center OPPOSITION: (Verified8/15/16) Department of Finance AB 2048 Page 7 Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 80-0, 6/1/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon Prepared by:Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111 8/15/16 20:10:13 **** END ****