BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2069 (Medina)


          As Amended  May 27, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Higher          |13-0 |Medina, Baker, Bloom, |                    |
          |Education       |     |Chávez, Irwin,        |                    |
          |                |     |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, |                    |
          |                |     |Linder, Low, Olsen,   |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Weber,      |                    |
          |                |     |Williams              |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |








                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  2





           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Requires the metrics for the collection of data to  
          measure the effectiveness of the Student Success and Support  
          Program (SSSP) to the annual ratio of paid part-time (P/T)  
          faculty office hours per P/T faculty full-time (F/T) equivalent;  
          and, specifies the Legislature intends that said data collection  
          shall not affect the allocation of SSSP funding.  


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Requires that all community college districts (CCD), with the  
            assistance of the California Community Colleges (CCC)  
            Chancellor, establish and maintain institutional research to  
            evaluate the effectiveness of the SSSP, as specified, and of  
            any other programs or services designed to facilitate  
            students' completion of their educational goals and course of  
            study.  Specifies the metrics for said research shall include,  
            but be not limited to the following:
             a)   Prior educational experience, including transcripts when  
               appropriate, as determined by the chancellor;
             b)   Educational goals and courses of study;


             c)   Criteria for exemption from orientation, assessment, or  
               required counseling or advisement, if applicable;


             d)   Need for financial assistance;


             e)   Disaggregated data by ethnicity, gender, disability,  
               age, and socioeconomic status, to the extent this  
               information is available;










                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  3





             f)   Academic performance, such as the completion of  
               specified unit thresholds, success in basic skills courses,  
               grade point average, course completion outcomes, transfer  
               readiness, and degree and certificate completion; and,


             g)   Any additional information that the chancellor finds  
               appropriate (Education Code (EC) Section 78214).


          2)Requires the CCC Board of Governors (BOG) to develop a formula  
            for allocating funding for the SSSP in order to implement  
            services, as specified (EC 78216).
          3)Defines "faculty" as those employees of a CCD who are employed  
            in academic positions that are not designated as supervisory  
            or management, as specified.  Faculty include, but are not  
            limited to, instructors, librarians, counselors, community  
            college health services professionals, handicapped student  
            programs and services professionals, and extended opportunity  
            programs and services professionals (EC Section 87003).


          4)Defines any person who is employed to teach for not more than  
            67% of the hours per week considered a full-time assignment to  
            be a temporary (P/T) employee (EC Sections 87482.5 and 87882).  
             


          5)Requires the CCC BOG to adopt regulations regarding the  
            percent of credit instruction taught by full-time faculty and  
            authorizes CCDs with less than 75% F/T instructors to apply a  
            portion of their "program improvement" funds toward reaching  
            the 75% goal (commonly referred as "75/25") (EC Section  
            87482.6).


          The state has stopped providing program improvement funds and  
          the BOG has since required CCDs to provide a portion of their  
          growth funds to hiring more F/T faculty.








                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  4







          6)Expresses that the Legislature finds and declares that  
            community college P/T faculty are required to fulfill the same  
            teaching responsibilities as F/T faculty although students  
            have little or no access to P/T faculty outside of the  
            classroom; that the Legislature intends that students have the  
            same opportunity for academic assistance and guidance without  
            regard to whether a course at a CCC is taught by a F/T or P/T  
            faculty member; and, that the Legislature intends that CCC P/T  
            faculty teaching a minimum number of courses be compensated  
            for providing  academic counseling and assistance to students  
            outside of the classroom (EC Section 87880).


          7)Creates the Community College Part-Time Faculty Office Hours  
            Program for the purpose of providing community college  
            students equal access to academic advice and assistance; and,  
            authorizes the governing board of a CCD to provide  
            compensation for office hours to P/T faculty (EC Sections  
            87881 and 87883).


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, to the extent districts do not currently collect data  
          on P/T faculty holding officer hours, they would have to  
          establish a system, and potentially make information technology  
          modifications, to do so.  If costs averaged only $5,000 -  
          $10,000 per district, one-time statewide reimbursable costs  
          would be $360,000 to $720,000 (General Fund-Prop. 98).


          COMMENTS:  Background.  Part-time faculty have been expected to  
          provide the same high quality instruction as their F/T  
          colleagues, but they often times are not able to provide regular  
          student office hours and are not necessarily compensated for  
          professional responsibilities linked to student success.










                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  5





          Student success and support.  Senate Bill 1456 (Lowenthal),  
          Chapter 624, Statutes of 2012, was enacted to implement some of  
          the Student Success Task Force recommendations.  Among other  
          things, SB 1456 revised and recast the Seymour-Campbell  
          Matriculation Act of 1986 as the Seymour-Campbell Success Act of  
          2012 in order to target funding to services such as orientation,  
          assessment, and counseling and advising to assist students with  
          the development of education plans.  It also required that  
          students define goals, required that students declare a course  
          of study and mandated student participation in assessment,  
          orientation and education planning.


          At a regulatory level, the BOG has approved regulations that  
          provide enrollment priority to students who have participated in  
          assessment, orientation and who have developed an education  
          plan.  A revision of Title 5 regulations is in progress to  
          implement provisions of SB 1456 to require students to complete  
          core services as well as to declare a course of study.   
          Additionally, in 2012 the Board of Governors adopted enrollment  
          priorities and, in Spring 2013, districts are required to notify  
          students that accumulating 100 degree applicable units or being  
          on academic or progress probation for two consecutive terms will  
          result in the loss of enrollment priority.  Finally, as of Fall  
          2014, students who complete orientation, assessment, and have a  
          student education plan, will receive a higher enrollment  
          priority.


          The Seymour-Campbell Student Success Act of 2012 also specifies  
          that hiring of F/T faculty, including counselors, and providing  
          for P/T faculty support, are "essential educational priorities  
          that contribute to student success."


          Importance of faculty office hours.  Various studies have shown  
          that office hours play a vital component of higher education;  
          providing invaluable means for students to interact with faculty  
          outside of the classroom and/or lecture hall.  Office hours have  








                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  6





          been shown to provide students with confidence and motivation.   
          Many students describe office hour visits just as important as  
          attending a class.  Additionally, office hours have been linked  
          to student retention.


          Need for the measure.  According to the author, "the Legislature  
          has previously acknowledged the importance of this [office hours  
          for P/T faculty] issue."  Funds for the program were cut during  
          the recession and have not been restored.  The author contends  
          that,  P/T faculty have office hours as negotiated by their  
          contracts, but if contracts do not include office hours, which  
          many do not, then office hours are not offered.  While the  
          Student Success Scorecard collects and reports various metrics  
          that affect student success, it does not collect information on  
          office hours offered by P/T faculty.


          The author states, "One item not collected by community colleges  
          is provision of office hours by part-time faculty.  Given the  
          importance of office hours on student performance, and the  
          significant proportion of classes taught by part-time faculty,  
          this metric should be included in the Student Success Scorecard.  
          The measure will further support the goals of the  
          Seymour-Campbell Student Success Act by including the collection  
          of metrics essential for student success."


          This measure will include P/T faculty offered office hours as a  
          reporting requirement for the Student Success Scorecard.  


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Jeanice Warden / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960  FN: 0003266













                                                                    AB 2069


                                                                    Page  7