BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2072 (Chang)


          As Amended  April 27, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Education       |7-0  |O'Donnell, Olsen,     |                    |
          |                |     |Kim, McCarty,         |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Thurmond,   |                    |
          |                |     |Weber                 |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, McCarty,       |                    |
          |                |     |Eggman, Gallagher,    |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia, Chau, |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,        |                    |
          |                |     |Obernolte, Quirk,     |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Wagner,     |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 









                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  2






          SUMMARY:  Establishes the State Seal of STEM, to be affixed to  
          high school diplomas of qualified students, which recognizes  
          students who have attained proficiency in the subjects of  
          science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).   
          Specifically, this bill:


          1)Establishes the State Seal of STEM, to be awarded by the  
            Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), to recognize high  
            school graduates who have attained proficiency in fields of  
            study within the subjects of STEM. 


          2)States that school district participation in this program is  
            voluntary.


          3)States that the purposes of the State Seal of STEM are to:


             a)   Encourage students to study STEM subjects


             b)   Certify achievement within the STEM fields


             c)   Provide students with a tool to demonstrate STEM  
               competency to employers


             d)   Provide universities with a method to recognize and give  
               academic credit to applicants seeking admission


             e)   Prepare students with 21st century skills


             f)   Engage students in STEM learning at an early age








                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  3







             g)   Prepare students for a job market increasingly in need  
               of individuals with STEM skills 


          4)States that the State Seal of STEM certifies that a graduating  
            high school student has attained proficiency in STEM and meets  
            all of the following criteria:
             a)   Attained a 3.0 grade point average on a 4.0 scale for  
               STEM courses taken in high school


             b)   Successfully completed four year-long courses, or the  
               equivalent, in mathematics, and four year-long courses, or  
               the equivalent, in science while enrolled in high school.   
               States that the requirement for completion of up to one of  
               the year-long courses in mathematics may be satisfied by  
               completion of a course or courses in computer science


            c)   Has one of the following:


               i)     A score of three or higher on an advanced placement  
               examination in science


               ii)    A score of 600 or higher on an SAT subject test in  
               science


              iii)      A score of four or higher on an International  
            Baccalaureate examination in science


               iv)       A grade of B or higher in a college-level science  
                 course taken through concurrent enrollment









                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  4






               v)     A score indicating that the pupil has met or  
                 exceeded standards on a state-standards-aligned  
                 assessment in mathematics


            d)   Additionally, has one of the following:


               i)     A score of three or higher on an advanced placement  
               examination in mathematics


          ii)A score of 600 or higher on an SAT subject test in  
          mathematics


               iii.      A score of four or higher on an International  
                 Baccalaureate examination in mathematics


               iv)    A grade of B or higher in a college level  
                 mathematics course taken through concurrent enrollment


               v)     A score indicating that the pupil has met or  
               exceeded standards on a state-standards-aligned assessment  
               in mathematics 


          5)  Requires the SPI to:


             a)   Prepare and deliver to participating school districts an  
               appropriate insignia to be affixed to the diploma or  
               transcript of the student indicating that he or she has  
               been awarded a State Seal of STEM 

             a)   Provide other information it deems necessary for school  








                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  5





               districts to successfully participate in the program



          6) Requires school districts that participate in the program to  
          do both of the following:



             b)   Maintain appropriate records in order to identify  
               students who have earned a State Seal of STEM



             c)   Affix the appropriate insignia to the diploma or  
               transcript of each pupil who earns a State Seal of STEM


          7) States that no fee shall be charged to a pupil to receive a  
          State Seal of STEM.


          8)Makes the program operative only when data from the statewide  
            administration of state science assessments aligned to the  
            California Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) are  
            available.  States that data from a field test of a state  
            science assessment does not satisfy this requirement.


          9)Sunsets the program on July 31, 2024.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)Administrative costs to the California Department of Education  
            of approximately $98,000 General Fund (GF) annually to  
            administer the program through January 1, 2025. 








                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  6







          2)Any expenses incurred by school districts would likely be  
            minor, and would be incurred only to the extent they choose to  
            participate.


          COMMENTS:  


          State's STEM education infrastructure under construction.   
          Though California adopted NGSS-aligned science standards in  
          2013, the state's science curriculum remains under development.   
          The California Department of Education (CDE) is currently  
          revising the state's science curriculum framework to align with  
          the state's standards, and its completion has been delayed until  
          January of 2017.  This in turn has delayed the state and local  
          adoption of standards-aligned instructional materials for use in  
          classrooms.



          CDE is also currently developing NGSS-aligned assessments, which  
          are expected to be fully administered in the 2018-2019 school  
          year.  Until then, the state is requiring use of the science  
          assessments used prior to the adoption of the NGSS.  


          Access to STEM education remains uneven.  The Superintendent of  
          Public Instruction's STEM Education Task Force concluded, in a  
          2014 report, "many of California's students lack consistent  
          access to high-quality STEM education?[due to] lack of access to  
          high-quality STEM materials and instruction; insufficient  
          opportunities for students to engage in hands-on, inquiry based  
          learning; and insufficient professional preparation by teachers  
          at all levels," among other factors.


          This uneven access is reflected in many measures of student  








                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  7





          course-taking and achievement, including Advanced Placement,  
          International Baccalaureate, SAT II subject tests, and  
          out-of-school STEM educational opportunities.  Advanced  
          Placement data published by the College Board, for example,  
          indicate that a very small percentage of California high schools  
          students took AP examinations.  The College Board also notes  
          that "in many cases, schools serving large numbers of  
          traditionally underrepresented minority students do not yet  
          provide AP course work in STEM disciplines."



          Uneven access is also demonstrated by data on computer science  
          education.  According to a 2015 report issued by the Level  
          Playing Field Institute, access to computer science courses  
          varies considerably.  The report found that of the more than  
          half a million high school students in the largest 20 districts,  
          just 1% are enrolled in any computer science course, and that  
          nearly 75% of schools with the highest percentage of  
          underrepresented students of color offer no computer sciences  
          courses.



          Where should the bar be set, given the uneven access to STEM  
          education?  Given the uneven access to STEM education described  
          above, it is difficult to establish thresholds of performance  
          for earning a State Seal which balance opportunity and rigor.   
          If the bar is set high enough to denote a high level of  
          proficiency, only those students who have access to high quality  
          STEM opportunities will be able to earn the award.  If the bar  
          is set low enough to provide a fair opportunity for all students  
          to earn the award, the Seal may not denote a high level of  
          proficiency.



          What would be the value of a State Seal of STEM?  The State Seal  
          of Biliteracy, which indicates proficiency in a language other  








                                                                    AB 2072


                                                                    Page  8





          than English, is evidence of a specific, highly marketable skill  
          which students may use in seeking employment.  It is not clear  
          if the Seal proposed by this bill would confer any advantage in  
          postsecondary admissions or employment.



          Another diploma seal, the Golden State Seal Merit Diploma  
          (GGSMD), was established in 1997 to provide recognition to  
          public high school graduates who have demonstrated mastery of  
          the high school curriculum in English, history, mathematics and  
          science.  When the GSSMD was originally established, proponents  
          hoped it would serve as an ambitious goal that would both shape  
          teaching and inspire students.  Staff is unaware of evidence to  
          suggest that the GSSMD gives students a competitive advantage  
          when applying to college or seeking employment. 




          Analysis Prepared by:      Tanya Lieberman / ED. / (916)  
                          319-2087          FN: 0003042
                          Christine  
          Aurre