BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2081 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 12, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Jim Wood, Chair AB 2081 (Grove) - As Amended March 18, 2016 SUBJECT: Health care service plans: abortion coverage. SUMMARY: Provides that a health care service plan (health plan) is not required to include abortion as a covered benefit, and would prohibit the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) from denying, suspending, or revoking a plan's license, or otherwise sanction or discriminate against a health plan, if the health plan excludes coverage for abortions. EXISTING LAW: 1)Regulates health plans under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act (Knox-Keene) of 1975 through the DMHC. 2)Requires a health plan contract to provide to enrollees "basic health care services" defined as: a) Physician services; b) Hospital inpatient services and ambulatory care services; c) Diagnostic laboratory and diagnostic and therapeutic radiologic services; d) Home health services; e) Preventive health services; AB 2081 Page 2 f) Emergency health care services, as specified; and, g) Hospice care. 3)Allows the Director of DMHC to, for good cause, by rule or order, exempt a plan contract or any class of plan contracts from the requirement to provide basic health care service either unconditionally, upon specified terms and conditions, or for specified periods of time, if the Director finds the action to be in the public interest and not detrimental to the protection of enrollees, and that the regulation of the plan contracts is not essential to the purposes of Knox-Keene. 4)Establishes the California Reproductive Privacy Act, which provides that the state shall not deny or interfere with a women's right to choose or obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman, and makes legislative findings and declarations that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to personal reproductive decisions, and that every woman has the fundamental right to choose to bear a child or to choose and to obtain an abortion, as specified. 5)Mandates the 10 federally required essential health benefits (EHBs) in the individual and small group market and establishes the Kaiser Small Group health plan as California's EHB benchmark plan. FISCAL EFFECT: This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee. COMMENTS: 1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, DMHC changed its policy and threatened to punish any insurance company who AB 2081 Page 3 sold policies without elective abortion coverage when DMHC notified all private health plans in California that all health care plans issued in the state must immediately cover elective abortions and DMHC interpreted "basic health care services" to require coverage for all abortions. The author contends that it did this despite the fact that nothing in California law or in the state constitution requires private health plans to cover abortion, and despite the federal law which forbids this type of discrimination. The author argues that the state of California is at risk for losing billions of dollars in federal funding for violating federal law. The author indicates that seven California churches, with the help of the Life Legal Defense Foundation and Alliance Defending Freedom have filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (HHS OCR) asking the agency to enforce federal law, which outlaws discrimination against health insurance plans that do not include abortion. The author states that ironically, California exempts certain religious employers, allowing them to not include contraceptive coverage in their health-care plans, but this exemption does not exist for abortions. According to DMHC, it has approved a religious employer exemption with respect to abortion coverage for employers that meet the Act's definition of religious employer. 2)BACKGROUND. a) Knox-Keene. Knox-Keene requires coverage of basic health care services, which includes physician services, inpatient hospital services, ambulatory care services, outpatient hospital services, and preventive services. Health plans are required to provide these basic health care services to its enrollees when medically necessary. Existing regulations further define basic health care services, and specify that they must include a variety of family planning services. AB 2081 Page 4 b) Recent DMHC actions. In August 2014, DMHC sent letters to seven health plans it determined had language in their contracts that may discriminate against women by limiting or excluding coverage for termination of pregnancies. The letters were issued after it became known that two California universities limited employee coverage for abortions only to those necessary to protect a woman's health. In the letter, DMHC stated that it had erroneously approved or failed to object to the discriminatory language in the plans' evidence of coverage filings. DMHC reminded plans that Knox-Keene "requires the provision of basic health care services, and that the California Constitution prohibits health plans from discriminating against women who choose to terminate a pregnancy." DMHC also stated, "?all health plans must treat maternity services and legal abortion neutrally." Additionally, DMHC stated that exclusions and limitations on abortion coverage are incompatible with the California Reproductive Privacy Act and multiple court rulings that have "unambiguously established under the California Constitution that every pregnant woman has the fundamental right to choose to either bear a child or to have a legal abortion." DMHC also clarified that a plan is not required to cover abortions that would be considered unlawful. DMHC directed the health plans to review all current plan documents to ensure they are compliant with Knox-Keene with regard to legal abortion, including any plan documents previously approved or not rejected by the department. DMHC also required plans to amend health plan documents to remove discriminatory coverage exclusions and limitations, including but not limited to, any exclusion of coverage for "voluntary" or "elective" abortions and/or any limitation of coverage to only "therapeutic" or "medically necessary" abortions. AB 2081 Page 5 c) Relevant case law. Over four different terms, beginning in 1978, California's Budget Act changed provisions in the California Constitution that limited Medi-Cal coverage for abortion, yet still covered the medical expenses of indigent women who carried their child to term. The Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights filed suit in 1978, arguing that the denial of this coverage was a violation of California's constitutional right to privacy. The Superior Court agreed, ruling in Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal.3d 252 (1981) (CDRR v. Myers), "By virtue of the explicit protection afforded an individual's inalienable right of privacy by Article I, Section 1 of the California Constitution?the decision whether to bear a child or to have an abortion is so private and so intimate that each woman in this state - rich or poor - is guaranteed the constitutional right to make that decision as an individual, uncoerced by governmental intrusion." The court held that the abortion funding restrictions in the Medi-Cal program, which resulted in the funding of childbirth but not abortion, infringed the woman's exercise of her right of procreative choice. There is nothing to suggest that the state's regulatory authority for health plans is not subject to the same constitutional principle as its funding authority. d) Federal law. The Federal Hyde Amendment (Hyde Amendment) is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortions except if a pregnancy arises from incest or rape. The Hyde Amendment applies only to funds allocated by the annual appropriations bill for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and primarily affects Medicaid. The cutoff of federal Medicaid funds prompted some states to provide public funding for abortion services from their own budgets, without federal funding. Over time the number of states doing so has gradually expanded, either through legislation or consequent to judicial rulings mandating equal access to health care for low-income women. As of 2007, 17 of the 50 states provide such funding; four of AB 2081 Page 6 these states provide such funds voluntarily and 13 of these states do so pursuant to a court order. California is one of the 13 states that does so by court order, per CDRR v. Myers. e) Federal investigation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (HHS OCR) opened an investigation into DMHC's 2014 decision to require all health plans to cover abortions. HHS OCR is responsible for enforcing the Weldon Amendment. The Weldon Amendment allows the government to withhold federal funding from any federal, state, or local entities that discriminate against doctors, hospitals or health plans that choose not to offer or cover abortion services. At a congressional hearing in February 2016, the HHS Secretary indicated that the HHS OCR's investigation is not yet complete. 3)SUPPORT. The California Catholic Conference, Inc. (CCI) states that proponents of abortion are trying to force their view on Catholic Institutions and other faith-based healthcare organizations. CCI contends that the federal law does not enact such a rule and mandates at least one plan be available in each state that excludes most abortion coverage. 4)OPPOSITION. The National Health Law Program states that this bill would violate California constitutional law, statutory law, jurisprudence, and would deprive women of access to the reproductive health care they are entitled to seek. NARAL Pro-Choice California contends that insurance plans should treat termination of pregnancy and childbirth neutrally and offer full coverage of comprehensive reproductive health care services. Planned Parenthood states that if the state required health plans to cover childbirth, but not abortion, it would weight a woman's individual decision about how to treat her pregnancy and would interfere with the exercise of her right to obtain an abortion. The American Civil Liberties Union of California (ACLU) writes that pregnancy is a health condition requiring medical care and abortion, like childbirth, is an individual decision that a woman may make AB 2081 Page 7 about how to treat her pregnancy. Additionally, ACLU states that the concept that only certain abortions are medically necessary is a relic of criminal abortion law that was outdated when the Knox-Keene was passed in the 1970s and is in conflict with current California constitutional and statutory law. 5)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION. a) AB 2336 (Grove) of 2014, would have prohibited a person from performing, or attempting to perform an abortion if they know the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion on account of the gender of the unborn child. AB 2336 failed passage in the Assembly Health Committee. b) ACA 5 (Grove), of 2014, would have prohibited, except in the case of an emergency, a physician from performing an abortion on an unemancipated minor unless the physician has notified one of her parents, or a judge has granted the unemancipated minor a waiver of the notification requirement. ACA 5 failed passage in the Assembly Health Committee. c) AB 1254 (Grove), of 2015, would have provided that a health plan is not required to include abortion as a covered benefit, and would prohibit the DMHC from denying, suspending, or revoking a plan's license, or from otherwise imposing discipline on a plan, if the plan excludes coverage for abortions. AB 1254 failed passage in the Assembly Health Committee. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support AB 2081 Page 8 California Catholic Conference, Inc. Opposition American Civil Liberties Union of California American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, District IX Naral Pro-Choice California National Health Law Program Planned Parenthood Analysis Prepared by:Kristene Mapile / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097