BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2089| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 2089 Author: Quirk (D) Amended: 8/19/16 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE ELECTIONS & C.A. COMMITTEE: 4-1, 6/21/16 AYES: Allen, Hancock, Hertzberg, Liu NOES: Anderson SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 8/11/16 AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza NOES: Bates, Nielsen ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 69-3, 5/5/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Vote by mail ballots: voter notification SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill requires a county elections official to notify a vote by mail (VBM) voter if his or ballot was not counted, and the reason it was not counted. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/19/16 add double-jointing language to prevent chaptering out with AB 2911 (Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee). ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Provides that a VBM ballot must be received by the elections official from whom it was obtained, or by a precinct board in that jurisdiction, no later than the close of polls on AB 2089 Page 2 Election Day in order for that ballot to be counted. 2) Provides that any VBM ballot is timely cast if it is received by the voter's elections official via the United States Postal Service or a bona fide delivery company not later than three days after Election Day, as specified. 3) Requires a VBM ballot identification envelope to include specified information, including the following: a) A declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter resides within the precinct in which he or she is voting and is the person whose name appears on the envelope; b) The signature of the voter; c) The residence address of the voter as shown on the affidavit of registration; and, d) The date of signing. 4) Requires a county elections official, upon receiving a VBM ballot, to compare the signatures on the envelope with either of the following: a) The signature appearing on the voter's affidavit of registration or any previous affidavit of registration of the voter; or, b) The signature appearing on a form issued by an elections official that contains the voter's signature and that is part of the voter's registration record. 5) Permits a county elections official to use facsimiles of voters' signatures when determining if the signatures match provided that the method of preparing and displaying the facsimiles complies with existing law. 6) Requires the elections official, if it is determined that the signatures compare, to deposit the ballot, still in the identification envelope, in a ballot container. AB 2089 Page 3 7) Provides that if the ballot is rejected because the signatures do not compare, the envelope shall not be opened and the ballot shall not be counted, and requires the cause of the rejection to be written on the face of the identification envelope. 8) Prohibits a variation of a signature caused by the substitution of initials for the first or middle name, or both, to be grounds for the elections official to determine that the signatures do not compare. 9) Authorizes an elections official, in comparing signatures, to use signature verification technology. Prohibits an elections official, if the signature verification technology determines the signatures do not compare, from rejecting the ballot unless he or she visually examines the signatures and verifies that the signatures do not compare. 10) Allows VBM ballots to be counted if they are cast by Election Day and received by the elections official by mail no later than three days after the election, as specified. 11) Requires the county elections official to establish a free access system that allows a VBM voter to learn whether his or her VBM ballot was counted and, if not, the reason why the ballot was not counted. Requires the elections official to make the free access system available to a VBM voter upon the completion of the official canvass and for 30 days thereafter. This bill: 1) Requires a county elections official to notify a VBM voter within 30 days after completion of the official canvass, if his or her ballot was not counted and include the reason the ballot was not counted. 2) Includes double-jointing language to avoid chaptering out issues with AB 2911 (Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee). AB 2089 Page 4 Background Existing law requires county elections officials to establish a free access system to allow a voter to learn if his or her VBM ballot was counted, and if not, the reason why the ballot was not counted. This system is required to be available to VBM voters upon the completion of the official canvass and for 30 days thereafter, with responsibility on the voter to determine the VBM ballot status by either phoning into a toll-free number or visiting the county elections officials Internet Web site and answering a few questions. Dude, where's my vote? In its 2014 report, "Improving California's Vote-by-Mail Process: A Three-County Study," the California Voter Foundation explored VBM voting in California in elections taking place in Orange, Sacramento, and Santa Cruz counties from 2008-2012. The study cited three primary reasons that VBM ballots went uncounted in California elections: 1) 61 percent of the uncounted ballots arrived late; 2) 20 percent were lacking a signature; and, 3) 18 percent arrived with a signature on the envelope that did not match the one on the voter's affidavit of registration. Comments 1) According to the author, in California, a majority of voters in a general election cast their ballots by mail. Fifty-one percent of Californians who voted in the November 2012 election, voted by mail. Unfortunately, 59,370 VBM ballots were not counted by county registrars throughout the state during the November 2012 election. AB 2089 requires election officials to notify VBM voters when their ballot was not counted in the last election cycle. The local election officials will be permitted to come up with the best notification process that would be the best fit for AB 2089 Page 5 their area. In California, we have a reputation for setting the right precedent for the nation; AB 2089 will continue this legacy. 2) Would you like that in a postcard, voicemail, or text? Although this bill requires local election officials to notify a VBM voter that their ballot was not counted, it is unclear how that notification would be accomplished. The author's office has advised Elections Committee staff that the method of notification would be left up to each of the individual election officials. As such, is this an issue area that might benefit from Secretary of State regulation? Related/Prior Legislation SB 589 (Hill, Chapter 280, Statutes of 2013) required elections officials to establish a free access system by which a VBM voter may learn whether his or her ballot was counted and, if not, the reason why it was not counted. SB 1725 (Bowen, Chapter 687, Statutes of 2006) required elections officials to establish procedures to ensure the security, confidentiality, and integrity of any personal information collected stored or otherwise used in tracking VBM ballots. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill could result in unknown General Fund reimbursable costs, potentially in excess of $50,000 each election cycle, to reimburse counties. SUPPORT: (Verified8/12/16) None received AB 2089 Page 6 OPPOSITION: (Verified8/12/16) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 69-3, 5/5/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon NOES: Travis Allen, Brough, Wagner NO VOTE RECORDED: Bigelow, Beth Gaines, Gordon, Harper, Jones, Mayes, Patterson, Waldron Prepared by:Frances Tibon Estoista / E. & C.A. / (916) 651-4106 8/22/16 22:41:46 **** END ****