BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Senator Wieckowski, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 2090 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Alejo | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |-----------+-----------------------+-------------+----------------| |Version: |5/27/2016 |Hearing |6/29/2016 | | | |Date: | | |-----------+-----------------------+-------------+----------------| |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Rebecca Newhouse | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (also known as AB 32), requires the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to determine the 1990 statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions level and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit that is equivalent to that level, to be achieved by 2020, and to adopt GHG emissions reductions measures by regulation. ARB is authorized to include the use of market-based mechanisms to comply with these regulations. (Health and Safety Code §38500 et seq.) 2) Establishes the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) in the State Treasury, requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected pursuant to a market-based mechanism be deposited in the fund. (Government Code §16428.8) 3) Prohibits the state from approving allocations for a measure or program using GGRF moneys except after determining that the use of those moneys furthers the regulatory purposes of AB 32, and requires moneys from the GGRF be used to facilitate the achievement of reductions of GHG emissions in California. (HSC §39712) 4) Establishes Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP), administered by the California Department of Transportation AB 2090 (Alejo) Page 2 of ? (Caltrans), and continuously appropriates 5% of GGRF fund proceeds for transit operations to expand service and reduce emissions of GHGs, with a priority on serving disadvantaged communities. This bill: 1)Allows funds from LCTOP to be expended to support the operation of existing bus or rail service if the following criteria are met: a) The governing board of the transit agency declares a fiscal emergency, as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), within 90 days of the agency requesting LCTOP funds. b) The expenditure of the LCTOP funds is necessary to sustain the transit agency's transit service in the year in which the funds would be expended. c) The governing board of the transit agency would be forced to reduce or eliminate transit service if the requested LCTOP funds are not received. d) The governing board of the transit agency makes a finding that a reduction in or elimination of existing transit service would increase GHG emissions because customers would choose other less-efficient modes of transportation. 2)Defines the criteria for which funds from LCTOP can be expended by the transit agency after it declares a fiscal emergency under CEQA, as specified. Background AB 2090 (Alejo) Page 3 of ? 1) Cap-and-trade auction revenue. Since November 2012, ARB has conducted 15 cap-and-trade auctions, generating over $4 billion in proceeds to the state. State law specifies that the auction revenues must be used to facilitate the achievement of GHG emissions reductions and outlines various categories of allowable expenditures. Budget allocations. SB 862 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 36, Statutes of 2014), a budget trailer bill, established a long-term cap-and-trade expenditure plan by continuously appropriating portions of the funds for designated programs or purposes. The legislation appropriates 25% for the state's high-speed rail project, 20% for affordable housing and sustainable communities grants, 10% to the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program, and 5% for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP). The remaining 40% is available for annual appropriation by the Legislature. The Governor's 2016-17 proposed budget appropriates over $3 billion to a variety of programs and projects in the transportation, energy, natural resources, and waste diversion sectors. 2) Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. LCTOP was established to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce GHG emissions and improve mobility, with a priority on serving disadvantaged communities. LCTOP is administered by Caltrans and is continuously appropriated 5% of GGRF funds. In 2014-15, LCTOP received $25 million, and in 2015-16 it was funded at $100 million. LCTOP expenditures are required to support new or expanded transit service, directly enhance or expand transit service to increase mode share, and reduce GHG emissions. Prior to receiving an allocation, which is distributed by the State Controller through the State Transit Assistance formula, eligible transit agencies must submit a description of their proposed expenditures and demonstrate how each expenditure will reduce GHG emissions. Approved projects in LCTOP may include equipment acquisition, fueling, maintenance, and other AB 2090 (Alejo) Page 4 of ? costs to operate new or expanded services and/or facilities. For transit agencies whose service area includes disadvantaged communities, at least 50% of the total moneys received are required to be expended on projects that will benefit disadvantaged communities. Comments 1) Purpose of Bill. According to the author, "This bill would provide transit agencies with an additional tool for maintaining current transit service levels during fiscal emergencies, with the acknowledgement that severe funding challenges hurt transit ridership and jeopardize the state's long-term greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. An important part of meeting the state's greenhouse emission reduction goals is not only to expand existing transit services, but also to maintain existing services to prevent people from having to take on less environmentally safe modes of transportation." 2) Counter to goals of LCTOP program. LCTOP is funded through a 5% continuous appropriation of GGRF. Projects funded through GGRF are required to demonstrate GHG emissions reductions. Because of the statutory and legal requirements with regard to use of GGRF, LCTOP was designed to require new or expanded service to increase ridership in order to provide additional GHG emissions reductions above and beyond base levels of service. The requirements of the program are intended to prevent GGRF moneys be used to subsidize current levels of service, or backfill operating budgets. Because of budget deficits, proponents wish to use LCTOP funds to maintain current levels of transit service. Does that objective run counter to the original policy goals of LCTOP and the statutory mandates for the use of GGRF, intended to fund projects that result in new, additional GHG emissions reductions? 3) After three years time. Under the bill, a governing board may use LCTOP moneys to maintain current levels of service for three years, provided they declare a fiscal emergency each of those years. In a situation where a transit agency has no choice but to declare a fiscal emergency and use LCTOP to AB 2090 (Alejo) Page 5 of ? subsidize current operations, the funds are being used not to increase sustainability or decrease the structural deficit, but simply to barely maintain the status quo. Will the moneys simply delay the inevitable? How will a three year operating subsidy fix a transit agency's structural funding problems? 4) Fiscal emergency. Under AB 2090, transit agencies may use LCTOP moneys to support the operation of existing bus or rail service if the governing board of the transit agency declares a fiscal emergency, and finds that LCTOP funds are necessary to sustain the transit agency's level of service. However, once LCTOP funds are available when a fiscal emergency is declared, will transit agencies, frequently strapped for funds, be more likely to declare fiscal emergencies instead of implementing alternative options, such as fare increases, changes in transit service, renegotiations of agreements with universities and cities, and other measures that may improve fiscal sustainability down the road? DOUBLE REFERRAL: This measure was heard in the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee on June 21, 2016, and passed out of committee with a vote of 9-0. Related/Prior Legislation SB 824 (Beall) makes various changes related to LCTOP, including requiring expenditures under the LCTOP to fund new or expanded service, increase mode share, or purchase zero-emission buses. SB 824 is set for hearing in the Assembly Transportation Committee on June 27, 2016. SOURCE: Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District SUPPORT: Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments California Transit Association City of Santa Cruz Monterey-Salinas Transit Orange County Transportation Authority AB 2090 (Alejo) Page 6 of ? Riverside Transit Agency Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Transportation Agency for Monterey County Ventura County Transportation Commission OPPOSITION: None received -- END --