BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2124


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2124 (Eduardo Garcia and Lackey)


          As Amended  May 27, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Environmental   |7-0  |Alejo, Dahle, Beth    |                    |
          |Safety          |     |Gaines, Gray, Lopez,  |                    |
          |                |     |McCarty, Ting         |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Education       |7-0  |O'Donnell, Olsen,     |                    |
          |                |     |Kim, McCarty,         |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Thurmond,   |                    |
          |                |     |Weber                 |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |








                                                                    AB 2124


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Appropriates $10 million from the General Fund to the  
          State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) for  
          allocation to local educational agencies as grants to improve  
          access to, and the quality of, drinking water at public  
          elementary and secondary schools.   Specifically, this bill:  
          1)Requires the State Water Board to establish a grant program to  
            award grants to public elementary and secondary schools to  
            improve access to, and the quality of, drinking water at those  
            schools. 


          2)Authorizes the State Water Board to award grants for:  
            installation of water bottle filling stations; installation or  
            replacement of drinking water fountains with devices that are  
            capable of removing any contaminants that are present in the  
            school's water supply; installation of point-of-entry or  
            point-of-use treatment devices; and, plumbing repairs that  
            improve drinking water quality.


          3)Requires the State Water Board to, in developing the procedure  
            for awarding grants, set requirements for grant recipients to  
            adopt a program for inspecting and maintaining any water  
            treatment device funded by the grant; establish a maximum  
            grant amount; and, give priority to applicants that serve a  
            very small disadvantaged community and applicants that are  
            served by public water systems that the board finds  
            consistently fail to provide an adequate supply of safe  
            drinking water.


          4)Defines "very small disadvantaged community" as a municipality  
            with a population of 10,000 persons or less, or a reasonably  








                                                                    AB 2124


                                                                    Page  3





            isolated and divisible segment of a larger municipality  
            encompassing 10,000 persons or less, with an annual median  
            household income that is less than 80% of the statewide annual  
            median household income.


          5)Appropriates $10 million, without regard to fiscal years, from  
            the General Fund to the State Water Board for allocation to  
            local educational agencies as grants to improve access to, and  
            the quality of, drinking water at public elementary and  
            secondary schools.


          6)Requires, within six months of the allocation of the funds to  
            local educational agencies, the State Water Board to provide  
            to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the  
            Legislature specified data relating to the allocation.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Requires, pursuant to the federal "Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids  
            Act of 2010," schools participating in the National School  
            Lunch Program to provide free drinking water where  
            reimbursable meals are served during the meal period.  


          2)Requires school districts to provide access to free, fresh  
            drinking water during meal times in school food service areas,  
            unless the governing board of a school district adopts a  
            resolution stating it is unable to comply with this  
            requirement due to fiscal constraints or health and safety  
            concerns.  Provides that a school district may comply with the  
            drinking water provision requirement by, among other means,  
            providing cups and containers of water or soliciting or  
            receiving donated bottled water. 










                                                                    AB 2124


                                                                    Page  4





          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, enactment of this bill could result in a one-time  
          general fund appropriation of $10 million to the State Water  
          Board for grants and administration of the program.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "An estimated 25% of  
          California schools do not provide free, fresh drinking water to  
          students at meal times every day; despite state and federal laws  
          that require it.  Even worse, according to the most recent state  
          survey, nearly 500 small community water systems and schools  
          haven't supplied safe drinking water to their communities and  
          schoolchildren for years, or even decades.  We know these  
          numbers underestimate the problem, because no state agency  
          regularly maps this data? AB 2124 will implement the development  
          of a grant program that would award $10 million to improve  
          access and the quality of drinking water in California schools."


          Drinking water contamination in disadvantaged communities.   
          According to the State Water Board report, Communities that Rely  
          on Contaminated Groundwater, released in January 2013, 682  
          community public water systems, which serve nearly 21 million  
          people, rely on contaminated groundwater as a primary source of  
          drinking water.  The report points out that an additional two  
          million Californians rely on groundwater from either a private  
          domestic well or a smaller groundwater-reliant system that is  
          not regulated by the state, the water quality of which is  
          uncertain.  The findings from State Water Board report, and a  
          2012 UC Davis study, Addressing Nitrate in California's Drinking  
          Water, suggest that drinking water contamination in California  
          disproportionally affects small, rural and low-income  
          communities that depend mostly on groundwater as their drinking  
          water source.  


          The recent drought has further compromised the state's drinking  
          water supplies.  Since many rural households rely on shallow  
          domestic wells or small, poorly funded community water supply  








                                                                    AB 2124


                                                                    Page  5





          systems, they have been hardest hit.  According to the Public  
          Policy Institute of California, as of early July 2015, more than  
          2,000 dry domestic wells were reported, mostly in the Central  
          Valley and Sierras, with more than half in Tulare County.   
          Emergency water supply needs have also been identified for more  
          than 100 small water community water systems around the state.


          Drinking water contamination in schools:  Schools have also  
          faced challenges in providing safe drinking water.  The  
          Community Water Center, in partnership with researchers at  
          Stanford University and California State University, Stanislaus,  
          is currently assessing the prevalence of unsafe water in  
          California public schools.  Preliminary results of their  
          assessment suggest that an estimated 813 to 1,522 schools in  
          California experienced at least one drinking water standard  
          violation between 2003-2014, with an estimated 336-534 schools  
          experiencing at least one violation in two or more years during  
          the same time period.  The study suggests that 42% - 48% of  
          schools that have experienced a drinking water standard  
          violation are in disadvantaged communities.


          Safe drinking water provision in schools:  Last year, the  
          California Endowment launched Agua4All, a pilot project, in  
          partnership with the nonprofit organizations Rural Community  
          Assistance Corporation (RCAC), Community Water Center, and  
          Pueblo Unido CDC.  One of the goals of Agua4All is to install  
          water taps in communities that lack access to safe drinking  
          water.  Agua4All has installed 75 water stations in the eastern  
          Coachella Valley, and 71 water stations and 86 point-of-use  
          filters in South Kern County.  According to RCAC, now more than  
          25,000 students have access to safe drinking water that didn't  
          before.  


          The goal of this bill is to build on this local program by  
          creating a funded grant program with statewide eligibility to  
          provide access to safe drinking water in schools.  Based on  








                                                                    AB 2124


                                                                    Page  6





          their experience in implementing Agua4All, RCAC explains that  
          each tap, such as a water bottle filling station or other place  
          where people can access safe drinking water, costs about $5000  
          per tap, including point-of-use filtration.  Each tap serves an  
          average of 200 students.  Taking into account those costs and  
          the number of students served per tap, supporters estimate that  
          the $10 million appropriation in this bill, adjusting for the  
          costs of the administration of the program, could provide safe  
          drinking water at schools for a little less than 400,000  
          students.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 319-3965   
                                                                      FN:  
          0003338