BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2125


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2125 (Chiu)


          As Amended  May 31, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Health          |18-0 |Wood, Maienschein,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Burke,       |                    |
          |                |     |Campos, Chiu,         |                    |
          |                |     |Dababneh, Gomez,      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Roger Hernández,      |                    |
          |                |     |Lackey, Olsen,        |                    |
          |                |     |Patterson,            |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Ridley-Thomas,        |                    |
          |                |     |Rodriguez, Santiago,  |                    |
          |                |     |Steinorth, Thurmond,  |                    |
          |                |     |Waldron               |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Environmental   |7-0  |Alejo, Dahle, Beth    |                    |
          |Safety          |     |Gaines, Gray, Lopez,  |                    |
          |                |     |McCarty, Ting         |                    |








                                                                    AB 2125


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |19-1 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |Gallagher           |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Roger Hernández,      |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,        |                    |
          |                |     |Obernolte, Quirk,     |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Wagner,     |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Requires the California Department of Public Health  
          (DPH) to develop and publish guidelines for local governments to  
          implement local healthy nail salon recognition (HNSR) programs  
          with specified criteria, including the use of less toxic nail  
          polishes and polish removers and improved ventilation.  Requires  
          DPH to develop awareness campaigns and post specified  
          information on its Internet Web site.  Permits DPH to prioritize  
          its outreach to counties with the greatest number of nail  
          salons.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, General Fund costs of $390,000 per year for two years  
          to DPH to implement this bill, including review of current  
          ordinances, development of a model ordinance, field evaluations  
          of nail salon exposures, outreach and education, and other  
          activities.









                                                                    AB 2125


                                                                    Page  3






          COMMENTS:  According to the author, voluntary local HNSR  
          programs across the state have begun to create safer and  
          healthier nail salon communities.  The author states that this  
          bill will expand these programs and help incentivize nail salons  
          to choose healthier alternatives to dangerous chemicals through  
          recognition, education and outreach.  In return, the author  
          states that nail salons will gain more customers and a happier,  
          healthier workforce.  The author asserts that currently, the  
          spread of these programs to immigrant women worker population  
          has rested on the shoulders of small non-profit organizations.   
          Education and outreach by the DPH will significantly improve  
          local governments' awareness of these important programs that  
          address immigrant community vitality, environmental justice, and  
          women and workers' health.  Additionally, a well-organized  
          consumer awareness campaign across California is needed to help  
          raise the health and safety standards through consumer knowledge  
          and pressure.


          According to the Department of Toxic Substance Control, nail  
          products containing the "toxic-trio" of the chemicals, which are  
          dibutyl phthalate, toluene, and formaldehyde, pose health and  
          safety risks to both consumers and roughly 121,000 nail salon  
          technicians in more than 48,000 salons throughout California.   
          These chemicals have been the subject of ongoing public scrutiny  
          from non-government organizations, environmental and worker  
          rights groups, and various regulatory agencies over concerns  
          about nail product safety.  Exposure to toxic-trio chemicals is  
          associated with cancer, birth defects, asthma, and other chronic  
          health conditions.  


          In 2010, San Francisco became the first city in the country to  
          create a formal voluntary recognition program for salons which  
          do not use products containing specific toxic chemicals.   
          Created by a City ordinance, the voluntary HNSR Program is  
          administered by the San Francisco Department of the Environment.  
           Since 2010, Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties and  








                                                                    AB 2125


                                                                    Page  4





          the city of Santa Monica have adopted and are implementing  
          voluntary recognition programs that encourage salons to use less  
          toxic nail polishes and other products.  Nail salons are also  
          required to improve ventilation and participate in trainings on  
          best safety and health practices.  Salons that meet the program  
          criteria are given recognition with a certificate, window  
          sticker, or poster, and/or by being listed as a healthier nail  
          salon on a local government's Web site.


          The California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative, cosponsor of  
          the bill, asserts that this bill will lead to nail salons  
          voluntarily choosing less toxic products and practices,  
          benefitting the overall health of the nail salon industry,  
          including its workforce and consumers.  Asian Health Services  
          (AHS), cosponsor of this bill, writes that a significant number  
          of the patients in their clinics are nail salon workers.  AHS  
          states that this bill is critical for protecting the health of  
          this workforce and the sustainability of an industry that serves  
          as the economic cornerstone to so many Asian immigrants.  The  
          California Labor Federation writes in support that each day,  
          nail salon workers handle products identified as carcinogens by  
          leading international research organizations, and that these  
          chemicals have been clinically proven to cause respiratory,  
          neurological, and reproductive harm.


          There is no known opposition to this bill.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          John Gilman / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097  FN:  
          0003287












                                                                    AB 2125


                                                                    Page  5