BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING Senator Jim Beall, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 2126 Hearing Date: 6/21/ 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Mullin | |----------+------------------------------------------------------| |Version: |2/17/2016 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Manny Leon | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Public contracts: Construction Manager/General Contractor contracts DIGEST: This bill increases the number of authorized Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) projects from six projects to twelve, as specified. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Sets forth provisions governing public works contracting. These provisions generally prohibit public agencies from contracting with the same firm for both the design and the construction phases of a project. 2)Generally requires public works construction contracts to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. 3)Describes the CM/GC procurement method and makes legislative findings and declarations regarding benefits related to risk transfer and project phasing using CM/GC. 4)Authorizes the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to use CM/GC on no more than six projects, at least five of which must have construction costs greater than $10 million. 5)Authorizes the Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority, the San Mateo County Transit District, and the San AB 2126 (Mullin) Page 2 of ? Diego Association of Governments to use CM/GC for transit projects. 6)Authorizes a regional transportation agency (RTA) to use the CM/GC project delivery method to design and construct projects on expressways that are not on the state highway system if the projects are developed in accordance with an expenditure plan approved by the voters. 7)Defines key terms relative to the authority granted to RTA's to use CM/GC, as specified. 8)Provides that the entity responsible for maintenance of local streets and roads within the same jurisdiction of the expressway shall be responsible for the maintenance of the expressway. 9)Sets forth provisions governing the process for procuring CM/GC services. This bill expands, from six to 12, the number of projects for which Caltrans is authorized to use the CM/GC procurement method. Further specifies that of the 12 projects, at least 10 projects must have construction costs greater than $10 million and at least eight projects are required to use Caltrans employees or Caltrans consultants, as specified. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. The author notes that "this bill will extend CM/GC authorization by increasing the number of projects that Caltrans can build using CM/GC delivery method from six to twelve, thus increasing the opportunities to reduce costs and expedite congestion relief projects in the state." 2)Traditional project delivery. Traditionally, state and local entities develop and construct transportation projects with a process known as the design-bid-build (DBB) delivery method. This method requires the public agency to fully design a project and then ask general contractors to bid on the construction contract based on the agency's design. DBB procurement results in project risks being largely borne by the agency that designs the project, because the agency bears the financial burden if the plans are inadequate or unanticipated construction issues arise. AB 2126 (Mullin) Page 3 of ? 3)What is CM/GC? The CM/GC project-delivery method allows an agency to engage a construction manager during the design process to provide assistance to the design team, which can ultimately lead to a more constructible project. When design is nearly complete, the agency and the construction manager negotiate a guaranteed maximum price for the construction of the project based on the defined scope and schedule. If this price is acceptable to both parties, they execute a contract for construction services, and the construction manager becomes the general contractor. Studies suggest CM/GC often leads to less costly or more expediently delivered projects because of the construction manager's involvement in the design process. 4)Why pursue alternative project delivery approaches? For decades, state and local agencies have relied on the DBB procurement method for transportation projects. DBB reduces the risk for the construction contractor because the state or local agency has a completed design, procured right-of-way, and achieved environmental clearance before letting the contract. Agencies using this traditional method generally receive the lowest initial-cost construction contracts for a given project, because contractors are competitively bidding on a relatively risk-free project. Drawbacks to DBB can include longer completion times, constructability challenges unforeseen by the designers, and increasing costs over time due to change orders and claims. The CM/GC process is meant to provide continuity and collaboration between the design and construction phases of the project. Construction managers have an incentive to provide input during the design phase that will enhance constructability of the project later, because they know that they will have the opportunity to become the general contractor for the project. Furthermore, CM/GC promises to save project delivery time, provide earlier cost certainty, transfer some risks from the public agency to the contractor, and ensure project constructability. Finally, it allows each agency to design the project to complement the general contractor's strengths and capabilities, thereby providing maximum competitiveness in a low-bid procurement. 5)Prior authorization. AB 2498 (Gordon, Chapter 752, Statutes of 2012) authorized Caltrans to use CM/GC on no more than six projects, at least five of which must have construction costs AB 2126 (Mullin) Page 4 of ? greater than $10 million. At that time, the author introduced AB 2498 to authorize Caltrans to use CM/GC to start evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging project-delivery method that combined the best of both design-bid-build and design-build. To date, all six authorized slots have been granted and the projects are moving forward to completion. This bill proposes to double the amount of authorized CM/GC projects from six to twelve; however, preserves all the design, engineering, inspection, and reporting requirements established in AB 2498. 6)Current status. Regarding current CMGC projects underway, while none of the projects have yet been completed, no significant problems have been reported. As these projects move toward completion, a more thorough examination of the advantages and disadvantages of CM/GC contracting will be required. However, as the pros and cons continue to be evaluated; utilizing CM/GC for various types of transportation projects may be beneficial for evaluation purposes. Related Legislation: AB 2374 (Chiu) - extends existing authority for regional transportation agencies to use the CM/GC procurement method to include ramp projects that are not on the state highway system, as specified. AB 2374 will be heard by the Committee at the same hearing as AB 2126. AB 1171 (Linder, Chapter 413, Statutes of 2015) - provided limited authority for regional transportation agencies to use CM/GC on expressway projects that are not on the state highway system but are in sales tax measure expenditure plans. AB 1724 (Frazier, 2014) - would have granted regional transportation agencies broad authority to use CM/GC. This bill was held in this committee. AB 2498 (Gordon, Chapter 752, Statutes of 2012) - authorized Caltrans to use CM/GC on no more than six projects, at least five of which must have construction costs greater than $10 AB 2126 (Mullin) Page 5 of ? million. SB 1549 (Vargas, Chapter 767, Statutes of 2012) - authorized SANDAG to use CM/GC contracting on transit projects. AB 797 (Gordon, Chapter 320, Statutes of 2013) - authorized the VTA and the San Mateo County Transit District to use CM/GC contracting on transit projects. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes Assembly votes: Floor: 77-0 Appr: 19-0 Trans: 16-0 POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, June 15, 2016.) SUPPORT: Associated General Contractors Bay Area Council City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County California Transportation Commission San Mateo County Economic Development Association San Mateo County Transportation Authority OPPOSITION: None received -- END -- AB 2126 (Mullin) Page 6 of ?