Amended in Senate June 9, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 15, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2170


Introduced by Assembly Member Frazier

(begin deleteCoauthor: Senator end deletebegin insertCoauthors: Senators end insertHuesobegin insert and Huffend insert)

February 18, 2016


An act to amend Sections 2192 and 2192.2 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to transportation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2170, as amended, Frazier. Trade Corridors Improvement Fund: federal funds.

The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B) created the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund and provided for allocation by the California Transportation Commission of $2 billion in bond funds for infrastructure improvements on highway and rail corridors that have a high volume of freight movement, and specified categories of projects eligible to receive these funds. Existing law continues the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund in existence in order to receive revenues from sources other than the bond act for these purposes.

This bill would require revenues apportioned to the state from the National Highway Freight Program established by the federal Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act to be allocated for trade corridor improvement projects approved pursuant to these provisions.

Existing law requires the commission, in determining projects eligible for funding, to consult various state freight and regional infrastructure and goods movement plans and the statewide port master plan.

This bill would delete consideration of the State Air Resources Board’s Sustainable Freight Strategy and the statewide port master plan and would instead include consideration of the applicable port master plan when determining eligible projects for funding. The bill would also expand eligible projects to include rail landside access improvements, landside freight access improvements to airports, and certain capital and operational improvements.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 2192 of the Streets and Highways Code
2 is amended to read:

3

2192.  

(a) (1) The Trade Corridors Improvement Fund, created
4pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 8879.23 of the Government
5Code, is hereby continued in existence to receive revenues from
6state sources other than the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction,
7Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006.

8(2) Revenues apportioned to the state under Section 167 of Title
923 of the United States Code from the National Highway Freight
10Program, pursuant to the federal Fixing America’s Surface
11Transportation Act (“FAST Act”; Public Law 114-94) shall be
12allocated for projects approved pursuant to this chapter.

13(b) This chapter shall govern expenditure of those state and
14federalbegin insert revenuesend insert described in subdivision begin delete (a) revenues.end delete begin insert (a).end insert

15(c) The funding described in subdivision (a) shall be available
16upon appropriation for allocation by the California Transportation
17Commission for infrastructure improvements in this state on
18federally designated Trade Corridors of National and Regional
19Significance, on the Primary Freight Network, and along other
20corridors that have a high volume of freight movement, as
21determined by the commission. In determining the projects eligible
22for funding, the commission shall consult the Transportation
23Agency’s state freight plan as described in Section 13978.8 of the
24Government Code, and the trade infrastructure and goods
25movement plan submitted to the commission by the Secretary of
P3    1Transportation and the Secretary for Environmental Protection.
2The commission shall also consult trade infrastructure and goods
3movement plans adopted by regional transportation planning
4agencies, adopted regional transportation plans required by state
5and federal law, and the applicable port master plan when
6determining eligible projects for funding. Eligible projects for
7these funds include, but are not limited to, all of the following:

8(1) Highway capacity improvements, rail landside access
9improvements, landside freight access improvements to airports,
10and operational improvements to more efficiently accommodate
11the movement of freight, particularly for ingress and egress to and
12from the state’s land ports of entry, rail terminals, and seaports,
13including navigable inland waterways used to transport freight
14between seaports, land ports of entry, and airports, and to relieve
15traffic congestion along major trade or goods movement corridors.

16(2) Freight rail system improvements to enhance the ability to
17move goods from seaports, land ports of entry, and airports to
18warehousing and distribution centers throughout California,
19including projects that separate rail lines from highway or local
20road traffic, improve freight rail mobility through mountainous
21regions, relocate rail switching yards, and other projects that
22improve the efficiency and capacity of the rail freight system.

23(3) Projects to enhance the capacity and efficiency of ports.

24(4) Truck corridor and capital and operational improvements,
25including dedicated truck facilities or truck toll facilities.

26(5) Border capital and operational improvements that enhance
27goods movement between California and Mexico and that
28maximize the state’s ability to access funds made available to the
29state by federal law.

30(6) Surface transportation and connector road improvements to
31effectively facilitate the movement of goods, particularly for
32ingress and egress to and from the state’s land ports of entry,
33airports, and seaports, to relieve traffic congestion along major
34trade or goods movement corridors.

35(d) (1) begin deleteThe end deletebegin insertExcept as provided in paragraph (2), the end insert
36commission shall allocate the funding described in subdivision (a)
37for trade infrastructure improvements consistent with Section
388879.52 of the Government Code and the Trade Corridors
39Improvement Fund (TCIF) Guidelines adopted by the commission
40on November 27, 2007, or as amended by the commission, and in
P4    1a manner that (A) addresses the state’s most urgent needs, (B)
2balances the demands of various land ports of entry, seaports, and
3airports, (C) provides reasonable geographic balance between the
4state’s regions, (D) places emphasis on projects that improve trade
5corridor mobility and safety while reducing emissions of diesel
6particulate and other pollutant emissions, and reducing other
7negative community impacts, and (E) makes a significant
8contribution to the state’s economy.

begin insert

9
(2) The commission shall allocate the federal freight funding,
10specifically, pursuant to the original TCIF Guidelines, as adopted
11by the commission on November 27, 2007, and in the manner
12described in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph
13(1).

end insert
begin delete

14(2)

end delete

15begin insert(3)end insert In addition, the commission shall also consider the following
16factors when allocating these funds:

17(A) “Velocity,” which means the speed by which large cargo
18would travel from the land port of entry or seaport through the
19distribution system.

20(B) “Throughput,” which means the volume of cargo that would
21move from the land port of entry or seaport through the distribution
22system.

23(C) “Reliability,” which means a reasonably consistent and
24predictable amount of time for cargo to travel from one point to
25another on any given day or at any given time in California.

26(D) “Congestion reduction,” which means the reduction in
27recurrent daily hours of delay to be achieved.

28

SEC. 2.  

Section 2192.2 of the Streets and Highways Code is
29amended to read:

30

2192.2.  

The commission shall allocate funds made available
31by this chapter to projects that have identified and committed
32supplemental funding from appropriate local, federal, or private
33sources. The commission shall determine the appropriate amount
34of supplemental funding each project should have to be eligible
35for moneys based on a project-by-project review and an assessment
36of the project’s benefit to the state and the program. begin delete Except for
37border capital and operational improvements described in paragraph
38(5) of subdivision (c) of Section 2192,end delete
begin insert Fundedend insert improvements
39begin delete fundedend delete shall have supplemental funding that is at least equal to
40the amount of the contribution under this chapter. The commission
P5    1may give priority for funding to projects with higher levels of
2committed supplemental funding.



O

    97