BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2182 (Mullin)


          As Amended  May 31, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Education       |7-0  |O'Donnell, Olsen,     |                    |
          |                |     |Kim, McCarty,         |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Thurmond,   |                    |
          |                |     |Weber                 |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Arts            |7-0  |Chu, Obernolte,       |                    |
          |                |     |Hadley, Levine, Low,  |                    |
          |                |     |Medina, Nazarian      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Establishes the Neurocognitive Testing Pilot Grant  
          Program to provide grant funding to Title I schools for the  
          purposes of neurocognitive testing.  Specifically, this bill:


          1)Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to  
            develop an application process for school districts to apply  
            on behalf of Title I schools interested in participating in  
            the pilot program.  Requires the grants to be apportioned  
            under the pilot program to a total of three school districts,  
            which shall comprise one school district in each of the  
            following regions of the state:  southern, central, and  
            northern.  Requires each school district to commit to  
            participating in the pilot program for four school years in  
            order to track pupils tested in grade 9 through completion of  
            high school.  


          2)Requires the grant funds to be used for the following:


             a)   Baseline and postinjury neurocognitive testing of pupils  
               attending a Title I school serving any of grades nine to  
               12, inclusive, participating in interscholastic athletics  
               in any of the following sports: baseball, basketball,  
               cheerleading, field hockey, football, ice hockey, lacrosse,  
               rugby, soccer, softball, volleyball, and wrestling.  The  
               baseline neurocognitive testing shall take place at the  
               beginning of an athletic season before any competitions  
               have taken place and after any head injury, and shall be  
               repeated at intervals not exceeding 24 months for as long  
               as the athlete is enrolled at the school, provided that the  
               athlete is still participating in one or more of the 12  








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  3





               specified sports.  The baseline and postinjury  
               neurocognitive testing shall be administered by individuals  
               who have been trained to administer these tests.  These  
               individuals may include, but are not necessarily limited  
               to, employees of a participating school district.


             b)   Postinjury neurocognitive testing of an athlete who is  
               suspected of sustaining a concussion or head injury in an  
               interscholastic athletic activity.  Postinjury  
               neurocognitive tests shall be conducted within 72 hours of  
               the occurrence of the injury.


             c)   Training of personnel or to consult with experts on the  
               interpretation of postinjury test results.  The parent or  
               guardian of each athlete participating in any of the sports  
               shall also be notified, in writing, that the results of  
               baseline and postinjury neurocognitive testing conducted on  
               his or her child are available to the child's parent or  
               guardian upon request.  These neurocognitive testing  
               results may also be shared with the athlete's physician  
               upon the request of the athlete's parent or guardian.


             d)   Reporting to the county office of education (COE) data  
               that includes an overview of the baseline neurocognitive  
               testing conducted for each of the sports specified in the  
               bill and an overview of normal, abnormal, and follow-up  
               postinjury neurocognitive tests.  The data shall also  
               include the number of athletes who discontinue  
               participation in the sport following a concussion and  
               postinjury testing.


          3)Defines "neurocognitive testing" as a comprehensive evaluation  
            of a person's cognitive status by specific neurologic domains,  
            including, but not necessarily limited to, memory, attention,  
            problem solving, language, visuospatial, processing speed,  








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  4





            motor, and emotion.


          4)Requires the CDE to, based on the data collected by the COE   
            located in the area of participating school districts, prepare  
            a report including, but not necessarily limited to, all of the  
            following information:


             a)   The number of athletes who received the baseline tests.


             b)   The number of athletes who received the postinjury  
               tests.


             c)    The number of athletes who had taken the tests and  
               discontinued participation in any of the specified sports  
               due to concussion injuries.


          5)Specifies that the operation of this bill is contingent upon  
            the appropriation of funds in the annual Budget Act or another  
            statute.  


          6)Requires the report to be submitted to the appropriate policy  
            committees of the Legislature on or before December 31, 2021,  
            and to comply with Government Code Section 9795.


          7)Specifies that the pilot program sunsets and repeals on  
            January 1, 2022, unless a later enacted statute, that is  
            enacted before January 1, 2022, deletes or extends that date.


          8)Requires a school district, charter school, or private school  
            that elects to offer an interscholastic athletic program to  
            collect and maintain data on traumatic brain injuries and  








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  5





            concussions sustained by any of its pupils during an  
            interscholastic athletic activity.  Requires this data to be  
            reported periodically to the appropriate COE, but requires the  
            names of the injured pupils to be kept confidential.  Requires  
            the COE to compile and retain the data for summary and  
            analysis as it deems necessary.


          FISCAL:  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:


          1)Proposition 98/General Fund cost pressures, potentially in the  
            tens of thousands to fund the pilot program. The program is  
            contingent upon an appropriation in the budget act. 


          2)General Fund costs to the CDE of approximately $264,000 to  
            administer the grant program for four years.  The CDE would be  
            required to develop, implement, monitor, collect and analyze  
            data, and prepare reports to the Legislature on the findings  
            for each grant awarded. 


          3)Unknown, potentially reimbursable Proposition 98/General Fund  
            state mandated costs, likely in the thousands of dollars, for  
            county offices of education to compile and retain data for  
            summary and analysis. 




          COMMENTS:  The author states that the number of reported  
          sports-related concussions among student athletes has risen  
          dramatically, including a doubling between 2002 and 2012.  The  
          author adds, "Athletes who sustain concussions are at greater  
          risk of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, depression, early  
          onset dementia, and long-term brain damage," and that, "young  
          athletes experiencing head injuries are at greater risk of  
          long-term brain damage if injured during the critical stages of  








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  6





          brain development."  The author hopes that broader  
          neurocognitive testing will assist in the evaluation of  
          individual injuries and identify the incidence of sport-related  
          concussions among young athletes.


          Neurocognitive testing is used to evaluate brain processing in a  
          variety of neurological functions related to memory, attention,  
          language, emotion and other areas.  Testing can be conducted  
          with pencil and paper, or with computerized testing.  Testing  
          can be used as a baseline to gauge an athlete's condition  
          post-injury relative to performance before injury.  As such, it  
          can be a factor in making decisions as to whether and when an  
          athlete should return to activity and what kinds of activity may  
          be safe for that athlete. 


          The dangers of concussions and head injuries in sport have been  
          a growing concern, with frequent news reports of athletes,  
          primarily football players, sustaining traumatic and lasting  
          injuries.


          Among the dramatic news reports in March alone:


          1)A representative of the National Football League testified  
            that there is a connection between football and chronic  
            traumatic encephalopathy.
          2)Women's soccer standout Brandi Chastain announced she would  
            donate her brain to science for research into head injuries.


          3)Ivy League schools announced they would eliminate full-contact  
            practices for football.


          A Purdue University study in 2015 indicated lasting brain  
          changes among high school football players, even without  








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  7





          concussions, and that changes were not completely healed at the  
          end of an off-season.  The study used brain scans and changes in  
          brain chemistry to track players more extensively than  
          neurocognitive testing.


          The growing awareness of concussion dangers has led California  
          to enact a series of bills to protect students by limiting  
          full-contact practices; requiring education and information for  
          coaches, pupils and their parents; and protocols for removing  
          students from activity after injury and for returning them to  
          play.


          A few school districts in San Mateo County have sought stronger  
          protections for student athletes and have, in some cases, paid  
          for neurocognitive testing.  Following on this, the San Mateo  
          County Civil Grand Jury studied the issue and recommended, among  
          other things, that all districts in the county serving high  
          school students provide neurocognitive testing for all student  
          athletes, and recommended that the districts seek funding and  
          collect data.  The grand jury report noted that a leading  
          purveyor of the tests charges school districts $1,200 for 800  
          baseline tests.  These tests are computerized, with results  
          received automatically by the testing company.


          This bill establishes a pilot program for schools in three  
          districts (northern, central, and southern) to test athletes in  
          specified sports, track the pupils for four years, and collect  
          data to evaluate the effectiveness of neurocognitive testing.   
          Amendments adopted in the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          limit participation to schools that receive federal Title I  
          funds.  Title I provides supplemental funding to schools with  
          the highest percentage of low-income children.  According to the  
          CDE, in 2014-15, there were 3.9 million students in 6,457  
          schools that received Title 1 funds.  This bill also requires  
          school districts, charter schools and private schools that elect  
          to offer interscholastic sports to collect and report data on  








                                                                    AB 2182


                                                                    Page  8





          traumatic brain injuries and concussions.  


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Sophia Kwong Kim / ED. / (916) 319-2087  FN:  
          0003350