BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2192


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2192 (Salas)


          As Amended  April 6, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Business &      |16-0 |Salas, Brough, Baker, |                    |
          |Professions     |     |Bloom, Campos,        |                    |
          |                |     |Chávez, Dahle, Dodd,  |                    |
          |                |     |Eggman, Gatto, Gomez, |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,        |                    |
          |                |     |Mullin, Ting, Wood    |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |








                                                                    AB 2192


                                                                    Page  2





           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  In March of 2016, the Assembly Committee on Business  
          and Professions and the Senate Committee on Business,  
          Professions and Economic Development (Committees) conducted  
          multiple joint oversight hearings to review 11 regulatory boards  
          within the Department of Consumer Affairs, including the Court  
          Reporters Board (CRB).  This bill extends to January 1, 2021,  
          the provisions establishing the Board, as recommended by the  
          legislative sunset review committee. Specifically, this bill:




             1)    Extends the sunset date for the CRB to January 1, 2021.




             2)    Extends the sunset date for its Executive Officer (EO)  
                to January 1, 2021.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According the Assembly Appropriations Committee,  
          this bill will result in on-going annual Special Fund costs of  
          approximately $1.0 million (Court Reporters Fund) to extend the  
          Board beyond the January 1, 2017, sunset date.  This fund is  
          self-supporting with fee revenue.


          COMMENTS:


          Purpose.  In March of 2016, the Assembly Business and  
          Professions Committee and the Senate Business, Professions and  
          Economic Development Committee conducted multiple joint  
          oversight hearings to review 11 regulatory boards within the  
          Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA).  The Board is due to  








                                                                    AB 2192


                                                                    Page  3





          sunset January 1, 2017, and was among the boards under review.   
          This bill extends to January 1, 2021, the provisions  
          establishing the Board, as recommended by the legislative sunset  
          review committee.




          Background.  Court reporters are highly trained professionals  
          who stenographically preserve the words spoken in a wide variety  
          of official legal settings such as court hearings, trials, and  
          other pretrial litigation-related proceedings, namely  
          depositions.  Court reporters work in courtrooms as official  
          reporters or in the private sector as freelance reporters who  
          provide deposition services.  These transcripts, which include  
          testimony given under oath, are relied upon by the consumer as  
          an accurate source of information.  The CRB carries out its  
          mission by testing, licensing and disciplining court reporters,  
          who use the title certified shorthand reporter (CSR), and by  
          recognizing the schools of court reporting that meet state  
          curriculum standards.




          In California, a person must be licensed to work as a court  
          reporter in state courts (official reporter) or to act as a  
          deposition officer (freelance reporter).  Freelance reporters  
          provide services as individual contractors or through court  
          reporting firms.  There are approximately 6,800 licensed court  
          reporters in California, of which approximately 5,800 work  
          independently or for court reporting agencies, and approximately  
          750 to 1,000 work as employees of the state court system.


          Joint Oversight Hearings and Sunset Review of DCA Licensing  
          Boards.  In March of 2016, the Committees conducted multiple  
          joint oversight hearings to review 11 regulatory boards within  
          the DCA and one regulatory entity outside of the DCA.  The  








                                                                    AB 2192


                                                                    Page  4





          sunset bills are intended to implement legislative changes  
          recommended in the respective background reports drafted by the  
          Committees for the agencies reviewed this year.  During the  
          sunset review hearings, the Committees take public testimony and  
          evaluate the eligible agency prior to the date the agency is  
          scheduled to be repealed.  An eligible agency is allowed to  
          sunset unless the Legislature enacts a law to extend,  
          consolidate, or reorganize the eligible agency.


          In the Committee's background paper on the CRB, issues were  
          raised regarding the CRB's ability to maintain long-term fiscal  
          solvency, administer the Transcript Reimbursement Fund (TRF),  
          and enforce court reporting statutes against foreign court  
          reporting corporations.  These issues are not addressed in this  
          bill.  The Board will need to continue to focus on its fee  
          structure and the impending sunset of the TRF.


          Statutory Fee Limit.  The Board's license fee reached the  
          statutory limit of $125 in July 2010.  This fee cap has not  
          changed since the Board was established in 1951 and is no longer  
          viable today.  As such, the Board is facing a structural  
          deficit, which will lead to a decreasing reserve of 4.7 months  
          at the end of Fiscal Year 2016-17.  While there is no statutory  
          mandatory reserve level for the Board, the TRF cannot be funded  
          when the Board reaches less than six months of operating  
          expenses in reserve.  In addition, the DCA Budget Office has  
          historically recommended that smaller programs maintain a  
          contingency fund slightly above the standard three to six months  
          of reserve.


          TRF Sunset.  In 1981, the legislature created the TRF to fund  
          payment of court transcripts for indigent litigants in civil  
          matters.  By law, a minimum of $300,000 of the Board's total  
          revenue must go to the TRF annually on July 1.  The TRF is  
          scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2017, at which time all  
          unencumbered funds remaining in the TRF, as of that date, will  








                                                                    AB 2192


                                                                    Page  5





          be transferred to the Court Reporters Fund.  The TRF consists of  
          the Pro Bono program and the Pro Per program that differ in who  
          may apply and how much monetary assistance is available to  
          individual cases and all cases overall.  The total amount of  
          annual funding for the Pro Per program is $30,000, which is  
          quickly exhausted each year as there are enough unpaid claims at  
          the end of the year to appropriate the full $30,000 at the  
          beginning of the next year, creating an ever-growing backlog of  
          applications.  The remaining $270,000 in the TRF is allocated to  
          the Pro Bono program.  This program runs on a fiscal year basis  
          and typically does not expend the full amount.


          Foreign Court Reporting Corporations.  According to the Board,  
          foreign corporations offering court reporting services are  
          operating in California without authorization.  AB 1461 (Ruskin)  
          of 2009 sought to clarify that in addition to corporations, a  
          firm, partnership, sole proprietorship or other business entity  
          providing or arranging for shorthand reporting services (any  
          entity offering or providing the services of a shorthand  
          reporter) was barred from doing or failing to do any act that  
          constitutes unprofessional conduct under any statute, rule or  
          regulation, as specified.  That bill died in the Assembly  
          Committee on Appropriations.  SB 270 (Mendoza) of the current  
          legislative session attempts to address this issue but has been  
          met with heavy opposition from foreign court reporting  
          corporations.  These corporations do not believe they are  
          subject to the provisions outlined in Moscone-Knox Professional  
          Corporations Act (Corporations Code Section 13400, et seq.)  
          because they are not professional corporations that offer  
          professional services.  Instead these corporations believe they  
          only contract for professional services, and are therefore  
          exempt from rules that would otherwise apply to professional  
          corporations and licensees.


          Current Related Legislation.  SB 270 (Mendoza) of the current  
          legislative session seeks to clarify the CRB's authority over  
          foreign professional corporations and increase penalties for  








                                                                    AB 2192


                                                                    Page  6





          violations of law, the author proposed amendments that would  
          instead require these corporations to register with the Board.   
          NOTE:  This bill is currently pending in the Assembly Business  
          and Professions Committee.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Gabby Nepomuceno / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301  FN:  
          0003191