BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Senator Jerry Hill, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 2192 Hearing Date: June 27, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Salas | |----------+------------------------------------------------------| |Version: |June 22, 2016 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Mark Mendoza | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Court Reporters Board of California: personnel SUMMARY: Extends the regulatory authority of the Court Reporters Board of California (CRB or Board) and its authority to appoint an executive officer (EO) until January 1, 2020; extends the sunset date for the Transcription Reimbursement Fund to January 1, 2019. Existing law: 1)Establishes the CRB within the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA); specifies that the CRB consists of three public members and two certified shorthand reporters (CSRs); extends the operation of the CRB until January 1, 2017; and, subjects the CRB to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 8000 et seq.) 2)Provides that the CRB may appoint, prescribe the duties, and fix the salary of an EO and extends the operation of the EO until January 1, 2017. (BPC § 8005) AB 2192 (Salas) Page 2 of ? 3)Authorizes the CRB to administer the Transcript Reimbursement Fund (TRF). (BPC Section 8008(g)) 4)Defines the practice of shorthand reporting as the making, by means of written symbols or abbreviations in shorthand or machine shorthand writing, of a verbatim record of any oral court proceeding, deposition, court ordered hearing or arbitration, or proceeding before any grand jury, referee, or court commissioner and the accurate transcription thereof. (BPC § 8017) 5)Defines a "CSR" as a person who holds a valid certificate as a shorthand reporter, provides that no other person, firm, or corporation may assume or use the title "CSR". (BPC § 8018) 6)Requires all fees and revenue collected by the CRB to be reported to the State Controller and be deposited with the State Treasurer to be placed in the Court Reporters' Fund, which fund is continued in existence in the State Treasury and is appropriated. (BPC § 8030) This bill: 1)Extends the sunset date for the CRB to January 1, 2020. 2)Extends the sunset date for its EO to January 1, 2020. 3)Reauthorizes the Board to use existing resources to undertake efforts to publicize the availability of the Transcript AB 2192 (Salas) Page 3 of ? Reimbursement Fund to prospective applicants through appropriate entities serving these applicants, including the State Bar of California, the California Commission on Access to Justice, and the Legal Aid Association of California. 4)Authorizes the CRB to transfer funds in increments of $100,000 of the $300,000 allocated for the TRF. 5)Establishes the Pro Se Program as a permanent program within the TRF. 6)Extends the TRF Sunset date to January 1, 2019. 7)Requires a vexatious litigant be ineligible to receive funds from the TRF, as specified. 8)Increases the amount of money disbursed to the Pro Se Program, within the annual $300,000 TRF amount, from $30,000 to $75,000. 9)Requires that each reimbursement for all applicants appearing pro se not exceed $1,500 per case. 10)Requires the CRB to prepare and submit to the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2019, a report on the condition of the Court Reporters' Fund, the condition of the TRF Fund, and alternative funding sources to cover the costs associated with transcripts provided indigent litigants, including, but not limited to, shorthand reporting services, such as transcript processing. Specifically, the report shall include: a) Expenditures and claims relating to this article, including the initial fund balance as of January 1, 2017. b) Funds received, including the amount of, and reason for, any refunds. c) Claims received, including the type of case, court involved, service for which reimbursement was sought, amount paid, and amount denied, if any, and the reason for denial. d) Efforts to publicize the availability of the funds in the TRF to prospective applicants. AB 2192 (Salas) Page 4 of ? e) Administrative fees. f) An analysis of the fund condition of the Transcript Reimbursement Fund including a five-year projection of its fiscal solvency based on the licensee fee level for those years. g) Whether the amount transferred annually to the TRF is sufficient to maintain the fund at a level that is sufficient to pay all qualified claims. i) If the amount transferred annually is not sufficient to maintain the fund at a level sufficient to pay all qualified claims, the board shall recommend a level that would be sufficient. ii) If the amount transferred annually is not sufficient to pay all qualified claims, the board shall recommend an alternative source of funding that does not exceed more than 25 percent of an individual licensee's renewal fee. 11)Makes other technical and conforming changes. FISCAL EFFECT: This bill has been keyed "fiscal" by Legislative Counsel. According to the April 27, 2016 Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, this bill has on-going Special Fund costs of approximately $1.0 million (Court Reporters Fund) to extend the Board beyond the January 1, 2017, sunset date. This fund is self-supporting with fee revenue. COMMENTS: 1. Purpose. The Author is the sponsor of the bill. According to the Author, "AB 2192 extends the sunset date of the Court Reporters Board of California from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2020. Without a sunset extension, the Board will lose its statutory authority to license and regulate court reporters. Additionally, AB 2192 extends and reforms the Transcript Reimbursement Fund, which makes transcript services available to indigent AB 2192 (Salas) Page 5 of ? litigants who would otherwise not have access to them." 2. Oversight Hearings and Sunset Review of Licensing Boards and Programs. Beginning in 2016, the Senate Business and Professions Committee and the Assembly Business and Professions Committee (Committees) conducted joint oversight hearings to review 12 regulatory entities: DCA, Acupuncture Board, Board of Behavioral Sciences, California Massage Therapy Association, Court Reporters Board, Board of Pharmacy, Physician Assistant Board, Board of Podiatric Medicine, Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education, Board of Psychology, Bureau of Real Estate, Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers, and Veterinary Medical Board. The Committees conducted two hearings in March and joined with the Senate Committee on Education and Assembly Committee on Higher Education to review Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education. This bill and the accompanying sunset bills are intended to implement legislative changes as recommended by staff of the Committees and which are reflected in the background papers prepared by Committee staff for each agency and program reviewed this year. 3. Financial Solvency. The CRB's license fee reached the statutory limit of $125 in July 2010. This fee cap has not changed since the CRB was established in 1951 and is no longer viable today. As such, the CRB is facing a structural deficit, which will lead to a decreasing reserve of 4.7 months at the end of Fiscal Year 2016-17. Last year, the CRB attempted to secure an author for a bill to raise the fee cap to $250, but was unsuccessful. While there is no statutory mandatory reserve level for the Board, the TRF cannot be funded when the Board reaches less than six months of operating expenses in reserve. In addition, the DCA Budget Office has historically recommended that smaller programs maintain a contingency fund slightly above the standard three to six months of reserve. Maintaining an adequate reserve provides for a reasonable contingency fund so that the Board has the fiscal resources to absorb any unforeseen costs, such as costly enforcement actions or other unexpected client service costs. 4. Transcript Reimbursement Fund. In 1981, the profession AB 2192 (Salas) Page 6 of ? initiated legislation that created the TRF to fund payment of court transcripts for indigent litigants in civil matters. By law, a minimum of $300,000 of the Board's total revenue must go to the TRF annually on July 1. The TRF consists of the Pro Bono program and the Pro Per program that differ in who may apply and how much monetary assistance is available to individual cases and all cases overall. The total amount of annual funding for the Pro Per program is $30,000, which is quickly exhausted each year as there are enough unpaid claims at the end of the year to appropriate the full $30,000 at the beginning of the next year, creating an ever-growing backlog of applications. The remaining $270,000 in the TRF is allocated to the Pro Bono program. This program runs on a fiscal year basis and typically does not expend the full amount. Since its inception in 1981, the TRF has had a sunset date, which the Legislature has continued to extend. The TRF is currently scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2017, and unless legislation is passed extending that date, all unencumbered funds remaining in the TRF, as of that date, will be transferred to the Court Reporters Fund. The Pro Per program began as a pilot project to expand the TRF for more indigent litigants. This project is also scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2017, unless legislation extends that date. Given the high demand for transcript reimbursements, the Author believes a report will provide insight into how to better serve indigent litigants and maintain a financially solvent TRF account. 5. Arguments in Support. The Court Reporters Board of California writes in support that "Court reporters play an essential role in our judicial system as a neutral third party who creates verbatim transcripts of proceedings in a timely fashion, thus ensuring the appeal rights of all litigants. Under the watchful eye of the Board, court reporters do their best, and, should any fall short, the Board is available to step in and correct the issue and work to ensure it does not happen again." AB 2192 (Salas) Page 7 of ? SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION: Support: The Court Reporters Board of California Opposition: None on file as of June 21, 2016. -- END --