BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2192 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2192 (Salas) As Amended August 15, 2016 2/3 vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |80-0 |(May 31, 2016) |SENATE: |30-8 |(August 18, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: B. & P. SUMMARY: Extends to January 1, 2020, the provisions establishing the Court Reporters Board (CRB), its executive officer, the Transcript Reimbursement Fund (TRF), and raises the statutory fee limit for the license renewal fee, as recommended by the legislative sunset review committee. This bill also requires the CRB to report, by November 1, 2018, on the fund condition, among other things, of the TRF and the Court Reporter Fund. Specifically, this bill: 1) Extends the sunset date for the CRB to January 1, 2020; and, AB 2192 Page 2 2) Extends the sunset date for its Executive Officer (EO) to January 1, 2020. The Senate amendments: 1) Extend the sunset date for the TRF to January 1, 2020; 2) Recast the Pro Per Pilot Project as a permanent part of the TRF; 3) Raise the expenditure limit of the Pro Per Pilot Project from $30,000 to $75,000; 4) Require the CRB to report to the Legislature by November 1, 2018, specified details of the TRF and the Court Reporter Fund, as follows: a) Expenditures and claims relating to the TRF and the Court Reporter Fund, including the initial balance of the TRF as of January 1, 2017; b) Funds received, including the amount of, and reason for, any refunds; c) Claims received, including the type of case, court involved, service for which reimbursement was sought, amount paid, and amount denied, if any, and the reason for denial; d) Efforts to publicize the availability of the funds in the TRF to prospective applicants. AB 2192 Page 3 e) Administrative fees; f) An analysis of the condition of the TRF, including a five-year projection of its fiscal solvency based on the licensee fee level for those years; g) Whether the amount transferred annually to the TRF is sufficient to maintain the fund at a level that is sufficient to pay all qualified claims; h) If the amount transferred annually is not sufficient to pay all qualified claims, the CRB must investigate and recommend alternative sources of funding, if any; and, i) If the amount transferred annually is not sufficient to pay all qualified claims, the CRB must investigate and recommend alternate sources of funding, if any. 5) Raise the statutory limit for the license renewal fee from $125 to $250. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill will result in: 1)Ongoing costs of $1.2 million per year for the continued operation of the CRB (Court Reporters Fund). Operations of the CRB are fully funded with license fee revenues. 2)Ongoing costs of $100,000 to $300,000 per year for the continued operation of the TRF. This fund is supported by transfers from the Court Reporters Fund. Current law requires $300,000 to be transferred annually for the purposes of the fund. However, in the budget year, only $100,000 in AB 2192 Page 4 expenditures is projected. 3)Increased fee revenues of about $870,000 per year due to the increase in the renewal fee from $125 to $250 (Court Reporters Fund). COMMENTS: Background. Court reporters are highly trained professionals who stenographically preserve the words spoken in a wide variety of official legal settings such as court hearings, trials, and other pretrial litigation-related proceedings, namely depositions. Court reporters work in courtrooms as official reporters or in the private sector as freelance reporters who provide deposition services. These transcripts, which include testimony given under oath, are relied upon by the consumer as an accurate source of information. The CRB carries out its mission by testing, licensing and disciplining court reporters, who use the title CSR, and by recognizing the schools of court reporting that meet state curriculum standards. In California, a person must be licensed to work as a court reporter in state courts (official reporter) or to act as a deposition officer (freelance reporter). Freelance reporters provide services as individual contractors or through court reporting firms. There are approximately 6,800 licensed court reporters in California, of which approximately 5,800 work independently or for court reporting agencies, and approximately 750 to 1,000 work as employees of the state court system. Joint Oversight Hearings and Sunset Review of Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) Licensing Boards. In March of 2016, the Assembly Business and Professions Committee and the Senate AB 2192 Page 5 Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee (Committees) conducted multiple joint oversight hearings to review 11 regulatory boards within the DCA and one regulatory entity outside of the DCA. The sunset bills are intended to implement legislative changes recommended in the respective background reports drafted by the Committees for the agencies reviewed this year. During the sunset review hearings, the Committees take public testimony and evaluate the eligible agency prior to the date the agency is scheduled to be repealed. An eligible agency is allowed to sunset unless the Legislature enacts a law to extend, consolidate, or reorganize the eligible agency. In the Committee's background paper on the CRB, issues were raised regarding the CRB's ability to maintain long-term fiscal solvency, administer the TRF, and enforce court reporting statutes against foreign court reporting corporations. Statutory Fee Limit. The CRB's license fee reached the statutory limit of $125 in July 2010. This fee cap has not changed since the CRB was established in 1951 and is no longer viable today. As such, the CRB is facing a structural deficit, which will lead to a decreasing reserve of 4.7 months at the end of Fiscal Year 2016-17. While there is no statutory mandatory reserve level for the CRB, the TRF cannot be funded when the CRB reaches less than six months of operating expenses in reserve. In addition, the DCA Budget Office has historically recommended that smaller programs maintain a contingency fund slightly above the standard three to six months of reserve. TRF Sunset. In 1981, the legislature created the TRF to fund payment of court transcripts for indigent litigants in civil matters. By law, a minimum of $300,000 of the CRB's total revenue must go to the TRF annually on July 1. The TRF is scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2017, at which time all unencumbered funds remaining in the TRF, as of that date, will be transferred to the Court Reporters Fund. The TRF consists of the Pro Bono program and the Pro Per program that differ in who may apply and how much monetary assistance is available to AB 2192 Page 6 individual cases and all cases overall. The total amount of annual funding for the Pro Per program is $30,000, which is quickly exhausted each year as there are enough unpaid claims at the end of the year to appropriate the full $30,000 at the beginning of the next year, creating an ever-growing backlog of applications. The remaining $270,000 in the TRF is allocated to the Pro Bono program. This program runs on a fiscal year basis and typically does not expend the full amount. This bill extends the operation of the CRB, its executive officer, and the TRF by three years and raises the renewal fee cap from $125 to $250. Analysis Prepared by: Gabby Nepomuceno / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301 FN: 0004746