BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2207 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 19, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Jim Wood, Chair AB 2207 (Wood) - As Introduced February 18, 2016 SUBJECT: Medi-Cal: dental program. SUMMARY: Makes changes to the Medi-Cal dental program (Denti-Cal) provider enrollment and disenrollment process, increases access and utilization oversight responsibility of the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) over Denti-Cal contracts, and aligns Denti-Cal fee-for-service (FFS) and Dental managed care (DMC) annual and quarterly data reporting requirements. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires DHCS to expedite the enrollment of Denti-Cal providers by streamlining the Medi-Cal provider enrollment process through the following activities: a) Create a dental-specific enrollment form; b) Pursue an alternative automatic enrollment process for a provider already commercially credentialed by either a dental FFS contractor or an administrative services contractor for the purpose of providing services as a AB 2207 Page 2 commercial provider; c) Discontinue requiring providers to resubmit an enrollment application that has been deemed incomplete if the missing information is available elsewhere within the application packet; and, d) Require DHCS to publish the criteria to expedite the enrollment of Denti-Cal providers in applicable provider bulletins and manuals. 2)Requires DHCS to disenroll a provider who has not participated in the dental program, as determined by DHCS, for more than a continuous one-year period. Permits DHCS to exercise additional measures as appropriate in order to improve the quality of the dental provider network, including, but not limited to, temporary suspensions. 3)Requires DHCS to monitor access and utilization of Denti-Cal services in the FFS and DMC delivery systems to assess opportunities to improve access and utilization and assess opportunities to develop and implement innovative payment reform proposals within Denti-Cal. 4)Requires DHCS to explore additional opportunities in consultation with stakeholders, to improve the Denti-Cal, including, but not limited to, the following: AB 2207 Page 3 a) Aligning the provision of dental anesthesia services with that of medical anesthesia services, including the ability to bill for applicable facility fees and ancillary services; b) Adjusting other utilization controls for specialty services, as appropriate, to promote access to care while still protecting program integrity; and, c) Expanding the scope of beneficiary outreach activities required by an entity that is contracted with the department to more broadly address underutilization throughout the state. 5)Requires DHCS to work with DMC plans that contract with DHCS for the purposes of implementing the Denti-Cal to provide beneficiaries with access to plan liaisons to assist in the coordination of care for enrolled members. 6)Requires a Medi-Cal managed care health plan to do all of the following: a) Provide dental screenings for every eligible beneficiary as a part of the beneficiary's initial health assessment; b) Ensure that an eligible beneficiary is referred to an AB 2207 Page 4 appropriate Medi-Cal dental provider; and, c) Identify plan liaisons available to DMC contractors and dental FFS contractors to assist in coordination of care. 7)Requires DHCS to post any proposed action on its Internet Website at least 30 days prior to implementing an action as required in 6) above. 8)Exempts any amendments, modifications or changes to Denti-Cal contracts entered into by DHCS from certain contracting provisions in order to increase the efficiency and timeliness of changes. Specifies that these exemptions do not exempt DHCS from establishing a competitive bid process for awarding new Denti-Cal contracts. 9)Requires DHCS to consult with, and provide notification to, stakeholders, including representatives from counties, local dental societies, nonprofit entities, legal aid entities, and other interested parties prior to implementation of new requirements. 10)Permits DHCS to implement, interpret, or make specific policies and procedures pertaining to the dental FFS program and DMC plans, as well as applicable federal waivers and state plan amendments, by means of all-county letters, plan letters, plan or provider bulletins, or similar instructions until regulations are adopted. Requires thereafter DHCS to adopt regulations in accordance with the requirements of the AB 2207 Page 5 Administrative Procedures Act. 11)Requires DHCS to provide a status report to the Legislature six months after the effective date of the statute and on a semiannual basis thereafter until regulations have been adopted. 12)Makes the implementation of this bill conditional upon DHCS obtaining any federal approvals necessary, any federal matching funds to the extent permitted by federal law, and an appropriation in the annual Budget Act each fiscal year. 13)Requires the list of performance measures established by DHCS along with the data of the dental FFS program to be posted on the department's Internet Website commencing January 31, 2017, for the 2015-16 fiscal year, and annually on or before January 31 each year thereafter. 14)Requires DHCS to post dental FFS performance data on a quarterly basis commencing April 30, 2017 on their Internet Website. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires DHCS to establish a list of performance measures designed to evaluate utilization, access, availability, and effectiveness of preventive care and treatment to ensure the dental FFS program meets quality and access criteria created by DHCS after consultation with key stakeholders as specified. AB 2207 Page 6 2)Requires DHCS to prepare, on an annual basis, a summary report of the nature and types of complaints and grievances regarding access to, and quality of, dental services, including the outcome and requires the report to be posted on their Internet Website. 3)Requires DHCS to establish a list of performance measures to ensure dental health plans meet quality criteria required by DHCS including but not be limited to provider network adequacy, overall utilization of dental services, annual dental visits, use of preventive dental services, use of dental treatment services, use of examinations and oral health evaluations, and other measures as specified. 4)Requires the performance measures to specify the benchmarks used by DHCS to determine whether and the extent to which a dental health plan meets each performance measure. Requires the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and the DHCS stakeholder advisory committee to have access to all performance measures and benchmarks used by DHCS. 5)Requires that the survey of member satisfaction with plans and providers be the same dental version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey as used by the previously established Healthy Families Program. 6)Requires DHCS to notify dental health plans at least 30 days prior to the implementation date of performance measures and AB 2207 Page 7 requires DHCS to include the initial list of performance measures and benchmarks in any dental health contracts entered into between the department and a dental health plan. 7)Requires DHCS to update performance measures and benchmarks and establish additional performance measures and benchmarks, as specified. 8)Requires DHCS to, when evaluating performance measures and benchmarks for retention on, addition to, or deletion from the list, consider all of the following criteria: a) Monthly, quarterly, annual, and multiyear DMC trended data; b) County and statewide Medi-Cal dental FFS performance and quality ratings; c) Other state and national dental program performance and quality measures; and, d) Other state and national performance ratings. 9)When establishing and updating the performance measures and benchmarks, requires DHCS to consult the existing managed care stakeholder advisory committee well as dental health plan representatives and other stakeholders, including representatives from counties, local dental societies, nonprofit entities, legal aid entities, and other interested parties. AB 2207 Page 8 10)Requires, when evaluating a dental health plan's ability to meet the criteria established through the performance measures and benchmarks, DHCS to select specific performance measures as the basis for establishing financial or other incentives or disincentives, including, but not limited to, bonuses, payment withholds, and adjustments to beneficiary assignment to plan algorithms. 11)Requires DHCS to designate an external quality review organization (EQRO) to conduct external quality reviews for any dental health plan contracting with DHCS. 12)Requires dental health plans, at least annually, to arrange for an external quality of care review with the EQRO designated by DHCS that evaluates the dental health plan's performance in meeting the performance measures, as specified. Permits DMHC direct access to all external quality of care review information upon request to DHCS. 13)Requires all marketing methods and activities to be used by dental plans to be in compliance with state regulations and requires each dental plan to submit its marketing plan to DHCS for review and approval. 14)Requires each dental plan to submit its member services procedures, beneficiary informational materials, and any updates to those procedures or materials to DHCS for review and approval. Requires DHCS to ensure that member services procedures and beneficiary informational materials are clear and provide timely and fair processes for accepting and acting upon complaints, grievances, and disenrollment requests, including procedures for appealing decisions regarding coverage or benefits. AB 2207 Page 9 15)Requires each dental plan to submit its provider compensation agreements to DHCS for review and approval. 16)Requires DHCS to post to its Internet Website a copy of all final reports completed by DMHC dental managed care plans. FISCAL EFFECT: This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee. COMMENTS: 1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, dental care consistently ranks with the public as the most important type of health care after medical. The impact that good dental hygiene and health has on people's self-esteem and quality of life cannot be understated. Dentistry is about prevention in order to avoid costly intervention at a later date; however, our system for participation and enrollment does not currently reflect that. Participation and entry to the program as a participating provider should be easy with restrictions and limiting parameters put in place only when a dentist's pattern of behavior warrants such. The limited number of private practitioners able to participate in the program is concerning due to the geographic limitations this can create. There are counties in California with just a couple of dentists participating in the program and too often these are older dentists who will be retiring soon, with no dentists able to take their place. The author states that the Denti-Cal system is so broken that many dentists provide pro-bono care as opposed to taking Denti-Cal because they both give back to their community and society and manage it in a way that it is not financially AB 2207 Page 10 devastating to their practices. The real loss in this system rests with beneficiaries. A 2014 California State Auditor report indicated that the insufficient number of dental providers willing to participate in Denti-Cal, low reimbursement rates, and a failure to adequately monitor the program, led to limited access to care and low utilization rates for Denti-Cal beneficiaries across the state. The Audit found that almost half of eligible beneficiaries did not receive dental care they were eligible for. Additionally, an April 2016 Little Hoover Commission (LHC) Report indicated that with dreadful reimbursement rates for dentists and slow, outdated paper-based administrative and billing processes that compare poorly with those of commercial insurers, Denti-Cal has thoroughly alienated its partners in the dental profession. Most California dentists want nothing to do with Denti-Cal and consequently, more than 13 million people eligible for coverage have limited or no access to dentists. This is unacceptable, and we must take action to change the system. While the provisions in this bill seem modest, they are significant steps towards improving the Denti-Cal system. The author concludes that this measure will streamline the enrollment process for providers, ensure that provider networks are up-to-date so that beneficiaries can more easily access providers, improve coordination of care for beneficiaries, and increase DHCS oversight of the Denti-Cal program. 2)BACKGROUND. AB 2207 Page 11 a) Denti-Cal. States are federally required to provide dental benefits to children covered by Medicaid (Medi-Cal in California) and the Children's Health Insurance Program. Denti-Cal is the Medicaid program that provides comprehensive dental care to pediatric and pregnant Medi-Cal beneficiaries and limited emergency services to adult beneficiaries. While Medicaid covers dental services for all child enrollees as part of a comprehensive set of benefits, referred to as the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment benefit, states may choose whether to provide dental benefits for adults. Minimum federal requirements for pediatric dental Medicaid programs include relief of pain and infections, restoration of teeth and maintenance of dental health. For children in Medi-Cal, dental care is provided on a FFS basis in all counties, with Sacramento and Los Angeles Counties also offering services through DMC plans. For more than 40 years Medicaid-enrolled Californians of any age were eligible for basic diagnostic, preventive, restorative and emergency dental procedures provided by participating dentists through Denti-Cal. In 2007, Denti-Cal provided comprehensive oral health care to more than eight million people. However, from July 2009 to May 2014, California eliminated funding for most adult non-emergency Denti-Cal benefits, effectively eliminating California's oral health safety-net. A partial restoration of benefits, primarily diagnostic and preventative services, was enacted in the 2013 Budget Act and became effective May 1, 2014. b) Denti-Cal FFS Performance. In 2012, dental health plans contracted with Barbara Aved Associates to conduct research AB 2207 Page 12 on Medi-Cal's FFS dental care. The study found, in part, that: i) 97% of non-participating dentists cited low reimbursement rates as the reason for not participating; ii) 90% of general dentists said it was somewhat or very difficult to find a pediatric dentists accepting Medi-Cal referrals; and, iii) 38% of general dentists and 69% of pediatric dentists who take Medi-Cal have 15% or less of their patient population in Medi-Cal. The researcher concluded that children in Medi-Cal are getting inadequate dental care, largely due to insufficient provider participation, reflecting low reimbursement rates. The researcher recommended: i) streamlining the provider enrollment process; ii) increasing rates; iii) adopting more quality measures; iv) increasing monitoring of utilization data; and, v) increasing public oral health education to families c) Denti-Cal Managed Care Performance. Under the FFS model, providers are reimbursed according to a rate schedule set by DHCS. The Medi-Cal Dental Managed Care Program contracts with three Geographic Managed Care (GMC) Plans and five Prepaid Health Plans that provide dental services to enrolled beneficiaries. Each dental plan receives a negotiated monthly per capita rate from the state for every recipient enrolled in their plan. Medi-Cal beneficiaries residing in Los Angeles County can access dental care either through the FFS delivery system or through prepaid health plans, while Medi-Cal beneficiaries residing in Sacramento County (with the exception of specific populations) are mandatorily enrolled in prepaid health plans for dental care. If Sacramento County beneficiaries are unable to secure services through their prepaid health plan in accordance with the applicable contractual time frames and the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, they can qualify for the beneficiary dental exemption, which allows them to move into the FFS delivery system. In 2012, about 143,000 child AB 2207 Page 13 beneficiaries received services under the DMC plans operating in the counties of Los Angeles and Sacramento. In 2010, First 5 of Sacramento commissioned the "Sacramento Deserves Better" report, produced by Barbara Aved Associates, which analyzed access, utilization, and quality of dental care under Sacramento's GMC Dental Services model. Key findings from this report include the following: i) Only 20% of children in GMC dental services used a dental service in 2008, as compared to over 40% of children in Medi-Cal statewide who are predominately in FFS; ii) Only 30% of children in GMC dental services received a dental service in 2010; iii) Sacramento GMC dental services is consistently one of the lowest-ranking counties for Medi-Cal dental access in the entire state; iv) Dental plans have not complied with a "first tooth/first birthday" recommendation for the initial dental visit; v) Inadequate prevention services were provided; and, vi) The state provided minimal oversight of GMC dental services contracts. AB 2207 Page 14 Early in 2012, through a series of articles and editorials, the Sacramento Bee (Bee) brought attention to the dire conditions of Sacramento County's pediatric DMC program. The Bee coverage focused on the findings of the report commissioned by First 5 of Sacramento, which revealed shockingly low utilization rates and highlighted a series of examples of specific children who had been in desperate need of dental care, yet unable to access the care they needed without significant delays, worsening conditions, prolonged pain, and a significant amount of fear, frustration, and relentless advocacy on the part of their parents. d) Legislative Hearings. A series of legislative hearings in 2012 found a lack of oversight of the DMC programs in Sacramento and Los Angeles counties by DHCS, resulting in significant underutilization by pediatric beneficiaries. On March 8, 2012, the Assembly Select Committee on Workforce and Access to Care convened a meeting to examine the state of the dental safety net, followed by a Senate Budget Hearing on March 22, 2012, that directly examined the Sacramento GMC dental program. As a result, 2012 budget trailer bill provided for the beneficiary dental exemption process, which allows beneficiaries who are not receiving adequate or timely access to care to opt out of the GMC dental program, requires DHCS to establish performance measures and benchmarks for dental health plans, requires DHCS to utilize dental health plan performance data for contracting purposes, and requires the establishment of contract incentives and disincentives, along with enacting other oversight mechanisms. e) Office of Inspector General Report. In January 2016, the AB 2207 Page 15 federal Department of Health and Human Services Officer of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report titled "Most Children with Medicaid in Four States are Not Receiving Required Dental Services." The study focused on four states: California, Indiana, Louisiana, and Maryland and analyzed Medicaid dental claims with service dates in 2011 and 2012, beneficiary enrollment files, and conducted structured interviews with state officials. The OIG report found that three out of four children did not receive all required dental services, with one in four children failing to see a dentist at all. All four states reported that they do not routinely track whether children are receiving all the required services. In addition, two of the four states had policies that do not allow payment for particular services in accordance with their periodicity schedules. All states reviewed reported facing shortages of participating dental providers and challenges in educating families about the importance of regular dental care. f) State Auditor's Report. On December 11, 2014, the California State Auditor issued a report titled "California Department of Health Care Services: Weaknesses in Its Denti-Cal Limit Children's Access to Dental Care." The report stated that insufficient number of dental providers willing to participate in Medi-Cal, low reimbursement rates and a failure to adequately monitor the program, led to limited access to care and low utilization rates for Medi-Cal beneficiaries across the state. The Audit found that 16 counties either have no active providers or do not have providers willing to accept new Medi-Cal patients, and 16 other counties have an insufficient number of providers. Recent changes in federal and state laws that have expanded Medi-Cal coverage could increase the number of children and adults who can receive additional covered dental services from 2.7 million to as many as 6.4 million, bringing into question the state's ability to provide AB 2207 Page 16 timely and adequate care to beneficiaries. g) LHC Report. On April 1, 2016, the LHC published a report titled "Fixing Denti-Cal." The LHC initiated an examination of the state's Denti-Cal program after receiving formal requests for a review from Legislators in April of 2015 and following the findings of the 2014 State Auditor's Report. Lawmakers requested that the LHC "undertake a review of the Denti-Cal program and identify the necessary steps to assure this vital program meets its purpose to provide access to dental care for many of the most vulnerable Californians including children." The LHC Report highlighted the lack of providers in the Denti-Cal program, inadequate and low provider reimbursement rates, enrollment, billing, and administrative challenges. The LHC provided 11 recommendations on how to improve the Denti-Cal program, as follows: i) The Legislature should set a target of 66% of children with Denti-Cal coverage making annual dental visits; ii) DHCS should simplify the Denti-cal provider enrollment forms and put them online in 2017; iii) DHCS should overhaul the process of treatment authorization requests; iv) DHCS should implement a customer focused program to improve relationships with its providers; v) DHCS should purge outdated regulations; AB 2207 Page 17 vi) The Legislature and Governor should enact and sign legislation in 2016 to create an evidence-based advisory group for the Denti-Cal program; vii) The Legislature and Governor should fund a statewide expansion of teledentistry and the virtual dental home; viii) State government, funders, and non-profits should lead a sustained statewide "game changer" to reorient the oral health care system for Denti-Cal beneficiaries toward preventative care; ix) The Legislature and DHCS should expand the concepts of Washington State's Access to Baby and Child Dentistry program and Alameda County's Healthy Kids, Healthy Teeth program to more regions of California; x) DHCS and California counties should steer more Denti-Cal eligible patients into Federally Qualified Health Centers with capacity to see them; and, xi) Medical societies and non-profit organizations should recruit more pediatricians to provide preventative dental checkups during well-child visits. h) Transformation Waiver. The new "Medi-Cal 20-20 Waiver" includes provisions to implement the "Dental Transformation AB 2207 Page 18 Initiative" (DTI), which aims to improve dental health for Medi-Cal children by focusing on high-value care, improved access, and utilization of performance measures to drive delivery system reform. The DTI provides incentive payments to Medi-Cal dental providers who meet certain requirements and benchmarks. The DTI provides $148 million annually in funding for five years for a maximum of $750 million. More specifically, DTI will include three domains: preventive service, caries risk assessment and management, and continuity of care. Specific incentive payments within each domain will be available to qualified providers, along with messaging and education to providers and beneficiaries about programs and efforts in their local communities. 3)SUPPORT. The LHC states that in its 2016 report, Fixing Denti-Cal, the LHC found the program to be lacking in multiple areas. The LHC made several recommendations aimed at expanding access to Denti-Cal services, with an ultimate goal of 66% of Denti-Cal-eligible children making annual dental visits. Several of those recommendations would require DHCS to take action to improve Denti-Cal from within. This bill would call on DHCS to expedite provider enrollment by creating a dental-specific enrollment form and pursuing alternative automatic enrollment for dentists already established commercially. This bill would also require DHCS to monitor access and utilization and explore additional opportunities to improve Denti-Cal. The LHC concludes that because this bill requires DHCS to improve and expand Denti-Cal provider enrollment, and shares the LHC's overall goal of expanding access to care, it supports this measure. The County Health Executives Association of California state that this bill proposes modest changes to the program, including expediting dental provider enrollment into the AB 2207 Page 19 Medi-Cal program, ensuring screenings are provided for every eligible Medi-Cal beneficiary as part of their initial health assessment, and ensuring beneficiaries are referred to appropriate Medi-Cal dental providers, which could improve the delivery of dental services to those most in need in California. 4)SUPPORT IF AMENDED. The Maternal and Child Health Access strongly supports the provisions of this bill, but urge amendments to clarify the intent that all pregnant women in Medi-Cal benefit from this bill's reforms, add performance measures unique to pregnant and postpartum beneficiaries, include maternal and infant health advocates in the stakeholder group and require DHCS to report access, and quality data for pregnant beneficiaries. Western Center on Law and Poverty also supports this bill, and urge amendments that add quality performance measures for adults, require the Denti-Cal provider referral list to be updated, and review ways to stream the Treatment Authorization Requests process. 5)RELATED LEGISLATION. a) AB 648 (Low) establishes the Virtual Dental Home program to expand the virtual dental home model of community-based delivery of dental care and directs the California Health Facilities Financing Authority to administer the grant program. AB 648 is on the Senate Inactive File. b) AB 2108 (Waldron) requires DHCS, on or before January 1, 2018, to submit a report to the Legislature on the cost and feasibility of restoring full adult dental services as a AB 2207 Page 20 covered benefit under the Medi-Cal Program and sunsets those provisions on January 1, 2019. AB 2108 is pending in the Assembly Health Committee. 6)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION. AB 1467 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 23, Statutes of 2012, allows Sacramento County to establish a stakeholder advisory committee (SC-SAC) to provide input on the delivery of oral health and dental care and required DHCS and the Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services advisory committee to meet with the SC-SAC. Authorizes the Director of DHCS to establish a beneficiary dental exception process in which Medi-Cal beneficiaries who are mandatorily enrolled in dental health plans in Sacramento County can move to FFS Denti-Cal. Requires DHCS to establish a list of performance measures to ensure that dental health plans meet quality criteria and required DHCS to post on its Website on a quarterly basis, beginning January 1, 2013, the list of performance measures and each plan's performance and made other changes to DMC as specified. 7)COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS. a) Disenrollment process clarification. The Committee recommends an amendment clarifying that if 12 months have passed since an enrolled Denti-Cal provider has made a claim for services rendered to a Denti-Cal beneficiary, a notice should be provided to that provider informing them that within 6 months they will be disenrolled from the Denti-Cal program. b) Distribution of providers and services. The author wishes to amend the bill to add to the list of performance measures established by DHCS data regarding the number of patients seen by a Dent-Cal provider in one calendar year, and the number of services rendered by that provider. AB 2207 Page 21 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support California Dental Association Children Now California Primary Care Association Children's Partnership County Health Executives Association of California First 5 Association of California National Association of Social Workers - California Chapter The Little Hoover Commission Opposition AB 2207 Page 22 None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Paula Villescaz / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097