BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  1





          GOVERNOR'S VETO


          AB  
          2218 (Burke)


          As Enrolled  September 9, 2016


          2/3 vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |75-0  |(April 14,     |SENATE: |37-0  |(August 25,      |
          |           |      |2016)          |        |      |2016)            |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 

           ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |COMMITTEE VOTE: |16-0 |(August 30,     |RECOMMENDATION:   |concur     |
          |                |     |2016            |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
           ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          (G.O)


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |71-7  |(August 31,    |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |2016)          |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  2







          Original Committee Reference:  G.O.
          SUMMARY:  Extends a licensing exemption for the owners of the  
          card room located at the old Hollywood Park Racetrack.   
          Additionally, extends the time after receipt of an order by the  
          Gambling Control Commission (CGCC) within which a person must  
          apply for a gambling license or a finding of suitability.   
          Specifically, this bill:


          1)Extends from three to six years a limited exemption in current  
            law that authorizes the CGCC to exempt specified limited  
            partners in limited partnerships from specified licensing  
            requirements solely for the purposes of the licensure of a car  
            club located on any portion of the grounds upon which a  
            racetrack is or had been previously located and horse racing  
            meetings were authorized to be conducted by the California  
            Horse Racing Board (CHRB) on or before January 1, 2012, that  
            is owned by a limited partnership that also owns or owned a  
            racetrack. 
          2)Requires the City of Inglewood, by July 1, 2018, to prepare  
            and submit a report to the Legislature and appropriate policy  
            committees on the progress of the construction of the City of  
            Champions Revitalization Project and the project's impact on  
            the divestment requirement contained in this bill.


          3)Makes legislative findings and declarations as to the  
            necessity of a special statute for the City of Inglewood. 


          4)Extends from 45 to 60 days the time after receipt of an order  
            by the Gambling Control Commission (CGCC) within which a  
            person must apply for a gambling license or a finding of  
            suitability.


          The Senate amendments: 








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  3







          1)Extend from three to six years a limited exemption in current  
            law that authorizes the CGCC to exempt specified limited  
            partners in limited partnerships from specified licensing  
            requirements solely for the purposes of the licensure of a car  
            club located on any portion of the grounds upon which a  
            racetrack is or had been previously located and horse racing  
            meetings were authorized to be conducted by the California  
            Horse Racing Board (CHRB) on or before January 1, 2012, that  
            is owned by a limited partnership that also owns or owned a  
            racetrack.
          2)Require the City of Inglewood, by July 1, 2018, to prepare and  
            submit a report to the Legislature and appropriate policy  
            committees on the progress of the construction of the City of  
            Champions Revitalization Project and the project's impact on  
            the divestment requirement contained in this bill.
          3)Makes legislative findings and declarations as to the  
            necessity of a special statute for the City of Inglewood.
          EXISTING LAW:


          1)The Gambling Control Act (Act) provides for the licensure of  
            certain individuals and establishments involved in various  
            gambling activities, and for the regulation of those  
            activities, by the CGCC.
          2)Requires every person who is required to hold a state license  
            to obtain the license prior to engaging in the activity or  
            occupying the position with respect to which the license is  
            required, except as specified.


          3)Requires every person who, by order of the CGCC, is required  
            to apply for a gambling license or a finding of suitability to  
            file an application within 45 calendar days after receipt of  
            the order.


          4)Provides that a person is deemed unsuitable to hold a state  








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  4





            gambling license to own a gambling establishment if the  
            person, or any partner, officer, director, or shareholder of  
            the persons, has any financial interest in any business or  
            organization that is engaged in a prohibited form of gambling,  
            whether within or without this state, except as specified.


          5)Authorizes the CGCC to exempt specified limited partners in  
            limited partnerships from specified licensing requirements  
            solely for the purposes of the licensure of a car club located  
            on any portion of the grounds upon which a racetrack is or had  
            been previously located and horse racing meetings were  
            authorized to be conducted by the California Horse Racing  
            Board (CHRB) on or before January 1, 2012, that is owned by a  
            limited partnership that also owns or owned a racetrack.


          6)Exempts from specified licensing requirements a person who (a)  
            is licensed or had an application to be licensed on file with  
            CGCC on or before February 1, 2013, (b) has a financial  
            interest in a business or organization engaged in gambling  
            prohibited by state law that was closed and was not engaged in  
            prohibited gambling at a time the person was either licensed  
            or had filed an application to be licensed or had filed an  
            application to be licensed with the CGCC, and (c) has a  
            financial interest in a gambling establishment that is located  
            on any portion the grounds on which a racetrack is or had been  
            previously located and horserace meetings were authorized to  
            be conducted by CHRB on or before January 1, 2012, that is  
            directly or indirectly owned by a racetrack limited  
            partnership owner, as defined.


          7)Requires an exempted person, within three years of the date  
            the closed business or organization reopens or becomes engaged  
            in any form of prohibited gambling, as specified, to either  
            divest that person's interest in the business or organization,  
            or divest that person's interest in the gambling enterprise or  
            gambling establishments for which the person is licensed or  








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  5





            has applied to be licensed by CGCC.


          8)Specifies that during the three-year divestment period it is  
            unlawful for any cross-promotion or marketing to occur between  
            the business or organization that is engaged in any form of  
            gambling, as specified.  Defines "cross-promotion or  
            marketing" as offering to any customers of the gambling  
            enterprise or gambling establishment anything of value related  
            to visiting or gambling at the business or organization  
            engaged in any form of gambling, as specified.


          9)Prohibits, during the three-year divestment period, any funds  
            used in connection with the capital improvement of the  
            gambling enterprise or gambling establishment from being  
            provided from the gaming revenues of either the business or  
            organization engaged in prohibited forms of gaming.


          10)Specifies that, if at the end of the three-year divestment  
            period, any person has not divested his/her interest in either  
            the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment or the  
            business or organization engaged in any form of prohibited  
            gaming, the current prohibition as it read on January 1, 2013,  
            will apply.


          11)Requires an exempted person to inform CGCC within 30 days of  
            the date on which a business or organization in which the  
            person has a financial interest begins to engage in any form  
            of prohibited gambling, as specified.
          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown


          COMMENTS:  


          Background:  The Hollywood Park Casino is owned by a group of  








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  6





          public pension plan investors known as the Stockbridge Capital  
          Partners, LLC, which also owns a share of the recently reopened  
          SLS Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. 


          The original purchase of the SLS Hotel and Casino, then known as  
          Sahara Hotel, by Stockbridge was made under the assumption that  
          leasing out the gaming casino at both the card club at Hollywood  
          Park and the Sahara Hotel would avoid the prohibition that  
          prevents an entity owning a card club in California from also  
          owning an interest in a gambling facility that operates gaming  
          which is prohibited in California.  This assumption was found to  
          be incorrect.


          In 2012, AB 1290 (Hill) was introduced to address which  
          individuals would need to be licensed at the card club and an  
          exemption for ownership of the Sahara Hotel.  The legislation  
          was not enacted.  As a result, the managers of Stockbridge  
          agreed to be licensed by the CGCC. 


          However, because of the prohibition against owning out of state  
          interest in a gambling establishment that operates gaming which  
          is prohibited in California, the Legislature passed and the  
          Governor signed SB 472 (Hill), Chapter 760, Statutes of 2013  
          which granted a three-year licensing exemption that gave  
          Stockbridge a three year period after the SLS Casino and Hotel  
          reopened to either divest their interest in the Hollywood Park  
          Casino or the SLS Casino and Hotel.  


          In addition, the bill prohibited co-promotion activities between  
          the Hollywood Park Casino and the SLS Hotel and Casino.  The SLS  
          Hotel and Casino reopened in late August of 2014 after going  
          through massive remodeling.  Thus, the current three year  
          exemption would expire in late August of 2017. 










                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  7





          Since the passage of SB 472, the St. Louis Rams reached a deal  
          to return back to Los Angeles.  The site that was selected to be  
          the home of the Los Angeles Rams was the former Hollywood Park  
          Racetrack where an 80,000 seat stadium, entertainment center,  
          and retail and office complex is being built.  As a result, the  
          Hollywood card club is in the process of being moved about 100  
          yards from its current location.  Hollywood Park has stated that  
          the move and the construction in the area have resulted in a  
          downturn in their business, which has prevented them from  
          selling the property in the 3 years the owners were given to  
          divest from either business.


          This bill would extend the licensing exemption that gives  
          Stockbridge a three year period to divest from Hollywood Park  
          Casino or the SLS Casino and Hotel another 3 years, until August  
          2020.   


          Purpose of the bill:  According to the author:  "This bill  
          simply extends the current three year divestment period in  
          current law by an additional three years.  This change would  
          allow the public pension plans to retain their interest in the  
          card club during the massive construction period required for  
          the new project and avoid the public pension plans from having  
          to divest of the card club during the major stadium/venue  
          construction period.  AB 2218 would retain all of the existing  
          conditions of the current law exemption, while simply extending  
          it for an additional three years while the massive construction  
          activities occur at the site"


          In addition the author argues that, "depending on an  
          individual's various financial holdings, as well as other  
          background, the documents required to be provided for a gaming  
          license can be very significant and require much time and effort  
          to provide.  The purpose of this bill is to expand the timeframe  
          that individuals have to file the application, to facilitate the  
          most comprehensive supply of documents to the CGCC."








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  8







          CalPERS Investment Report:  The CalPERS 2014-2015 Annual  
          Investment Report, which shows, among other things, performance  
          on all investments, operations, and initiatives for the one-year  
          period ending on June 30, 2015.  The report lists the book value  
          (value upon purchase) and market value (current value) of  
          Stockbridge's real estate assets this bill seeks an exemption  
          for - Hollywood Park Casino and the SLS Hotel and Casino.  The  
          Hollywood Park asset shows an increase in the investment of just  
          over $29 million (Book Value: $52,773,489; Market Value:  
          $81,775,383).  The SLS Casino asset shows an increase of just  
          under $1 million (Book Value: $33,915,001; Market Value:  
          $34,759,908).  It is important to note that the CalPERS report  
          is a snapshot of the fiscal year and does not take into account  
          the entire life of the investments in question.    


           Gambling Control Commission (CGCC):  The Act provides the CGCC  
          with jurisdiction over the operation of gambling establishments  
          in California.  The Act assigns the CGCC the responsibility of  
          assuring that gambling licenses are not issued to, or held by,  
          unqualified or disqualified persons, or by persons whose  
          operations are conducted in a manner that is harmful to the  
          public health, safety, or welfare.  The Act directs the CGCC to  
          issue licenses only to those persons of good character, honesty  
          and integrity, whose prior activities, criminal record, if any;  
          reputation, habits and associations do not pose a threat to the  
          public interest of this state.  The Department of Justice Bureau  
          of Gambling Control (DOJ or Bureau) conducts background and  
          field investigations and enforces the provisions of the Act in  
          this regard.


          Arguments in Support:  According to the State Building and  
          Construction Trades Council of California, "the Hollywood Park  
          site in Inglewood has been chosen for construction of a new,  
          state of the art, NFL stadium.  This addition, along with a  
          7,000 seat music venue will make this project a world class  








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  9





          location in Southern California.  Just as important, it will  
          provide an estimated 30,000 new jobs, many of which will be good  
          paying jobs in the construction industry, which our members are  
          very excited about.  We also understand that a construction  
          project of this magnitude, while a tremendous economic driver  
          for the region, will have a temporary impact on the business of  
          the card club located directly adjacent to the overall project.   
          This bill simply extends the current divestment period for an  
          additional three years while the massive construction efforts  
          are underway."


          Arguments in Opposition:  According to the United Auburn Indian  
          Community, "we did not oppose the first exemption in the spirit  
          of allowing the pension fund investors time to sort out the  
          conflicting ownerships.  But they have had ample time to divest  
          themselves from one or the other operation.  To allow an  
          additional exemption would undermine the purpose and intent of  
          the underlying California law."


          Opponents of the bill also argue that, "the special interest  
          exception represented by AB 2218 is unnecessary as there is  
          still adequate time under the existing exception for Stockbridge  
          and Hollywood Park Casino Company (HPCC)  to determine whether  
          to divest themselves of either Hollywood Park Casino or the SLS  
          Las Vegas.  Hollywood Park Casino has announced that it will  
          momentarily be opening its new casino facility.  The fact that  
          there is construction occurring elsewhere on the larger site has  
          no impact on the divestiture decision.  This requested special  
          exemption serves no purpose other than granting Stockbridge and  
          HPCC much more time to determine which property is more  
          valuable.  We submit that maximizing Stockbridge's and HPCC's  
          profits is not the job of the Legislature and most certainly  
          does not provide a sound basis upon which to continue to alter a  
          fundamental public policy."


          Prior/Related Legislation:  SB 472 (Hill), Chapter 760, Statutes  








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  10





          of 2013.  Created a three-year licensing exemption for the  
          owners of the card room located at Hollywood Park Racetrack by  
          authorizing the CGCC to exempt specified limited partners in  
          limited partnerships from specified licensing requirements.  


          SB 356 (Yee) of 2013-2014.  The bill would allow a person or  
          entity with a financial interest in a foreign gambling operation  
          to retain a California Gambling license. (Held in Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee)


          AB 1290 (Hill) of 2011-2012.  The bill would have repealed an  
          existing body of law in the Act relative to an exemption from  
          licensing requirements for a card club on the grounds of a  
          racetrack and recast that body of law.  The bill was intended to  
          ensure the continued operations of the card club located at the  
          Hollywood Park Racetrack. (Held on the Inactive File on the  
          Senate Floor)


          AB 2526 (Hall) of 2012 would have revised several definitions  
          within the Act.  Specifically the bill revised the definition of  
          a "key employee," added surveillance managers and supervisors to  
          the definition of "key employee" for licensing purposes and  
          deleted the term "pit boss" and replaced the term "shift boss"  
          to "shift manager."  (Held on the inactive file on the Senate  
          Floor)


          AB 777 (Hall) of 2011 would have required every person who is  
          required to hold a state license to obtain the license before  
          engaging in the activity or occupying the position with respect  
          to which the license is requires, except as specified.  (Never  
          Heard in Assembly Governmental Organization Committee)


          AB 3068 (Horton), Chapter 868, Statutes of 2006.  The bill  
          extended the provisions which apply to a publicly traded  








                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  11





          corporation owning a card club located on the grounds of the  
          entity's racetrack to a limited liability company or a limited  
          partnership.


          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:


          I am returning Assembly Bill 2218 without my signature.


          This bill provides the owners of the Hollywood Park Casino three  
          additional years to divest of its interest in the card club or  
          the SLS Casino in Nevada.


          The City of Champions Revitalization Project will continue to  
          bring enormous economic benefits to Inglewood regardless of  
          whether the cardroom is sold next year or in 2020.  If our  
          gambling laws are based on outdated policies or assumptions, we  
          should thoughtfully examine those laws and amend them so that  
          all participants in the industry receive the same benefits and  
          opportunities.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Kenton Stanhope / G.O. / (916) 319-2531  FN:   
          0005134

















                                                                    AB 2218


                                                                    Page  12