BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 2226|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2226
          Author:   Bigelow (R)
          Introduced:2/18/16  
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE:  13-0, 6/28/16
           AYES: Hall, Berryhill, Bates, Block, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Lara, McGuire, Vidak

          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-0, 5/19/16 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote

           SUBJECT:   Horse racing:  satellite wagering facilities:  fairs


          SOURCE:    California Authority of Racing Fairs
          
          DIGEST:    This bill authorizes a fair to contract with two or  
          more fairs that are licensed to conduct thoroughbred meetings  
          within the northern zone for the operation and management of a  
          satellite wagering facility.

          ANALYSIS:
          
          Existing law:
          
          1)Provides, pursuant to Article IV, Section 19(b) of the  
            Constitution of the State of California, that the Legislature  
            may provide for the regulation of horse races and horse race  
            meetings and wagering on the results.

          2)Grants the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) the authority  
            to regulate the various forms of horse racing authorized in  








                                                                    AB 2226  
                                                                    Page  2



            this state.

          3)Authorizes the CHRB to permit licensed racing associations,  
            fairs and mini-satellite licensees to operate satellite  
            wagering facilities.

          4)Authorizes the CHRB to approve the establishment of 15  
            mini-satellite wagering sites in each zone (for a total of 45)  
            and defines "mini-satellite wagering site" to mean a location  
            where satellite wagering may be conducted, with the approval  
            of the CHRB, provided that the wagering occurs in an area that  
            is restricted to those who are 21 years of age or older.

          5)Specifies that no mini-satellite site may be located within 20  
            miles of a race track, a satellite wagering facility, or a  
            tribal casino that has a satellite wagering facility without  
            the consent of each facility within a 20-mile radius.

          This bill makes a minor change to the state's Horse Racing Law  
          regarding the licensing and location of satellite wagering  
          facilities by clarifying two fairs may enter into an agreement  
          or partnership to establish a satellite facility within the  
          northern zone.

          Background

          Brief history and background.  California has allowed off-track  
          betting in satellite wagering facilities located at fairs and  
          racing associations throughout the state for over 30 years.   
          Satellite wagering was authorized at a time when California  
          racetracks were beginning to experience declining attendance and  
          handle figures.  The industry believed that making the product  
          easier to access would expose and market horse racing to  
          potential customers and also make it far more convenient for  
          existing patrons to wager more often.

          Currently, there are 28 satellite wagering facilities in  
          California - five of the facilities are at privately operated  
          racetracks, five at fairs that conduct live racing, fourteen at  
          county fairs and district agricultural associations, and four on  
          Indian lands.  Simulcast-only facilities do not have live  
          racing.  Those facilities accept wagers on races broadcast via  








                                                                    AB 2226  
                                                                    Page  3



          simulcast from in-state and out-of-state racetracks.

          In 2007, AB 241 (Price, Chapter 594, Statutes of 2007) was  
          enacted to authorize the creation of 15 "mini-satellites" in  
          each racing zone for a total of 45.  The stated intent of this  
          legislation was to make the sport of horse racing even more  
          accessible to potential California bettors and to increase the  
          handle - the amount wagered on horse races.  To date, ten  
          mini-satellite facilities have been licensed statewide.

          California's Horse Racing Law requires the CHRB to issue a  
          license to a mini-satellite facility for two years, and then  
          review the operation and the size of the handle, and determine  
          if it is in the best interest of horse racing to relicense the  
          facility or, in the alternative, license another mini-satellite  
          facility that might generate a greater handle.  If there are  
          more than 15 applications for mini-satellite wagering facilities  
          in any zone, the CHRB must determine which facilities will  
          generate the largest handle, and give priority to the approval  
          of those facilities.  

          California's Horse Racing Law makes it explicit that no  
          mini-satellite site may be located within 20 miles of a race  
          track, a satellite wagering facility, or a tribal casino that  
          has a satellite wagering facility without the consent of each  
          facility within a 20-mile radius.

          Purpose of AB 2226.  According to the author's office, there are  
          a few locations in California where the 20-mile radius  
          exclusion-zone of multiple fairs overlap.  One such example is  
          San Francisco and it falls within the exclusion zones of both  
          the Alameda County Fair and the San Mateo County Fair.  Under  
          current law, fairs can partner with one or more racing  
          associations that are licensed to conduct thoroughbred meetings  
          within the northern zone for the operation of a satellite  
          wagering facility.  However, current law does not authorize two  
          or more fairs to establish a partnership for the management of a  
          satellite facility.  This bill is intended to make it possible  
          for Alameda and San Mateo to enter into such a joint-venture  
          agreement for the purpose of establishing a CHRB licensed  
          mini-satellite facility in San Francisco.  Such a mini-satellite  
          facility could be established in a restaurant, bar, club, etc.








                                                                    AB 2226  
                                                                    Page  4




          Related/Prior Legislation
          
          SB 1439 (Price, 2010) would have decreased the exclusion zone in  
          which a mini-satellite horse racing wagering facility can be  
          situated in proximity to an existing horse racing satellite  
          wagering facility or live horse racing race track from a 20 to  
          15 mile radius. (Failed passage on Senate floor)

          SB 16X2(Ashburn, Chapter 12, Statutes of 2009-10 Second  
          Extraordinary Session) among other things, provided that  
          beginning on July 1, 2009, and annually thereafter, $32 million  
          shall be appropriated from the state's General Fund and paid  
          into the Fair and Exposition Fund for the financial support of  
          the network of California fairs.  
          
                    
          AB 241 (Price, Chapter 594, Statutes of 2007) authorized all  
          fairs to operate a satellite wagering facility off of the fair  
          grounds.  Also, authorized the establishment of up to 45  
          mini-satellite wagering sites to be operated by private industry  
          throughout California.  

          AB 1286 (Richardson, Chapter 202, Statutes of 2007) allowed the  
          Alameda County Fair and the Los Angeles County Fair (Fairplex)  
          to obtain authorization to operate new satellite wagering  
          facilities off of their fair grounds under certain conditions. 

          SB 1096 (Dutton, Chapter 1096, Statutes of 2005) authorized the  
          National Orange Show (San Bernardino County) to operate a second  
          satellite wagering operation within its fair district  
          boundaries. 

          AB 401 (J. Horton, Chapter 556, Statutes of 2003) permitted  
          Cal-Expo, with the approval of the Department of Food and  
          Agriculture and CHRB, to operate a satellite wagering facility  
          within the boundaries of Cal-Expo in addition to any facility  
          otherwise authorized under law. 
           
           SB 14 (Maddy, Chapter 1273, Statues of 1987) expanded satellite  
          wagering statewide.  









                                                                    AB 2226  
                                                                    Page  5



          FISCAL EFFECT:                 Appropriation:  No    Fiscal  
          Com.:             Yes          Local:          No


          SUPPORT:  (Verified 8/1/16)

          California Authority of Racing Fairs (source)

          OPPOSITION:  (Verified 8/1/16)

          None received



           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-0, 5/19/16
           AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,  
            Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke,  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines,  
            Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson,  
            Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger  
            Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey,  
            Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mayes, Medina,  
            Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,  
            Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,  
            Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,  
            Wilk, Wood, Rendon
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Chang, Mathis, McCarty, Williams



          Prepared by:  Arthur Terzakis / G.O. / (916) 651-1530
          8/4/16 11:44:12


                                   ****  END  ****


          











                                                                    AB 2226  
                                                                    Page  6