BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 2255


                                                                     Page  1





         Date of Hearing:  May 11, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


         AB  
         2255 (Melendez) - As Amended April 26, 2016


          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |Policy       |Health                         |Vote:|17 - 0       |
         |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
         |             |                               |     |             |
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


         Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


         SUMMARY:


         This bill establishes state oversight of "drug and alcohol free  
         residences" or sober living homes.  Specifically, this bill:


         1)Defines "drug and alcohol free residence" to mean a residential  







                                                                     AB 2255


                                                                     Page  2





           property that is operated as a cooperative living arrangement to  
           provide an alcohol and drug free environment for persons  
           recovering from alcoholism or drug abuse, or both, who seek a  
           living environment in which to remain clean and sober.


         2)Specifies a drug and alcohol free residence may be certified by  
           an approved certifying organization, and specifies requirements  
           for a certified drug and alcohol free residence.


         3)Provides a residence that houses persons who purport to be  
           recovering from drug and alcohol abuse must be presumed to be a  
           drug and alcohol free residence if the residence has been  
           certified by an approved certifying organization.


         4)Requires an approved certifying organization to meet a number of  
           requirements, including, among others, affiliation with an  
           approved national organization, inspections of drug and alcohol  
           free residences to ensure compliance with certification  
           requirements, and ensuring operators meet specified standards  
           and submit specified documents.  


         5)Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to adopt  
           application procedures and standards of approval for an  
           organization that seeks to be approved by the department as an  
           approved certifying organization.


         6)Allows the department to revoke approval of an approved  
           certifying organization, and to revoke the certification of a  
           residence as a drug and alcohol free residence.


         7)Allows the department to investigate complaints, impose  
           sanctions, and commence disciplinary actions (unspecified). 









                                                                     AB 2255


                                                                     Page  3





         8)Requires the department to maintain and post on its website a  
           registry containing specified contact information for each  
           certified facility.


         This bill does not mandate certification, but does deem any  
         certified facility as a "drug and alcohol free residence" to be  
         overseen by the state.


         FISCAL EFFECT:


         Estimated GF costs to DHCS of $885,000 in 2017-18, $820,000 in  
         2018-19, and ongoing for seven staff to establish and oversee the  
         program.  Staff would review compliance, including periodically  
         inspecting facilities, conducting complaint investigations,  
         perform data entry, and performing any additional oversight  
         requirements. Actual costs would depend on the number of homes  
         that maintained certification. 


         DHCS indicates existing information technology systems could  
         likely be used to meet the bill's requirements but that data entry  
         would be a significant cost.  This cost is included in the  
         estimate above.


         COMMENTS:


         1)Purpose. According to the author, thousands of facilities treat  
           former alcoholics and drug abusers, who are very susceptible to  
           relapse, without possessing any formal credentials.  The author  
           states this will help people stay sober and improve community  
           safety.


         2)Background. DHCS, formerly the Department of Drug and Alcohol  
           Programs, is the state oversight body for drug and alcohol  







                                                                     AB 2255


                                                                     Page  4





           treatment facilities and personnel. DHCS licenses substance use  
           treatment facilities, which provide 24-hour residential  
           nonmedical services to eligible adults who are recovering from  
           problems related to alcohol or other drug (AOD) misuse or abuse.  
           DHCS also offers a voluntary facility certification to both  
           residential and nonresidential programs.  Sober living homes are  
           alcohol and drug free living environments for individuals  
           attempting to maintain abstinence from alcohol and drugs.  In  
           contrast to alcoholism and drug abuse recovery or treatment  
           programs, because sober living homes are private residences and  
           do not offer treatment services, they are not regulated by the  
           state.  


         3)Related Legislation. 


            a)   AB 2403 (Bloom), also pending in this committee, requires  
              DHCS to issue a single license to a residential or integral  
              alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility when  
              specified criteria are met, and establishes a definition for  
              integral facilities.  


            b)   SB 1101 (Wieckowski) establishes new licensing  
              requirements for alcohol and drug counselors, and transfers  
              responsibilities pertaining to alcohol and drug counselor  
              certification and the approval and regulation of certifying  
              organizations from DHCS to the Department of Public Health.   
              SB 1101 is pending in the Senate.


         4)Prior Legislation. A litany of bills has addressed the issue of  
           sober living homes and related issues over the last decade. Most  
           recently, AB 2491 (Nestande) of 2014 would have exempted sober  
           living homes from licensure as an adult alcoholism or drug abuse  
           recovery or treatment facility and required sober living homes  
           to meet specified requirements.  AB 2491 was held on the  
           Suspense file of the Senate Appropriations Committee.  








                                                                     AB 2255


                                                                     Page  5






         5)Staff Comments. As this bill does not require facilities to be  
           certified, it is unclear what benefit is gained from state  
           oversight and registration of facilities by the state in a  
           database.  On the other hand, a requirement for certification  
           raises significant legal and policy concerns.  Finally, the role  
           of state staff vis-à-vis the certifying entity is unclear.  For  
           example, the bill specifies the state should respond to  
           complaints of an unspecified nature about a privately certified  
           entity, and it also gives the state authority to revoke a  
           certification it did not issue.   


         Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916)  
         319-2081