BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |AB 2257 |Hearing |6/29/16 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Maienschein |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |6/22/16 |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Favorini-Csorba | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency meetings: agenda: online posting Requires local agencies to post a link to the current meeting agenda prominently on their homepage. Background The Brown Act. The Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act), first enacted by the Legislature in 1953, is the set of state laws which guarantees the public's right to attend and participate in local legislative bodies' meetings. The Brown Act establishes procedures to ensure public access to information maintained by local agencies and that the decisions made by public agencies are done in an open and transparent fashion to retain public control over those agencies. Local agencies subject to the Brown Act include cities, charter cities, counties, school districts, special districts, and other political subdivisions of the state. The Brown Act establishes the presumption that business of local agencies' legislative bodies must be conducted in open and public meetings. No action may be taken by secret ballot, and the legislative body must publicly report the action taken and the votes cast. Among other things, the Brown Act requires a local agency to post an agenda for a regular meeting of its legislative body at least 72 hours before the meeting in a location that is freely accessible to members of the public and AB 2257 (Maienschein) 6/22/16 Page 2 of ? on the local agency's website, if it has one (AB 1344, Feuer, 2011). Open Data. In recent years, computer technology has advanced to allow electronic documents to be searched and indexed electronically. This searchability is enhanced by posting documents and other data in "open format," meaning one that is platform independent, machine readable, and made available to the public without restrictions that would impede the reuse of that information. The Legislature began considering open data bills in 2015, enacting statutes that require local agencies to create an inventory of their enterprise systems and make it available to the public (SB 272, Hertzberg, 2015) and it establishing standards for local agency websites that bill themselves as hosting "open data" (AB 169, Maienschein, 2015). These standards required data to be posted in an open format that is: Retrievable, downloadable, indexable, and electronically searchable by commonly used Internet search applications. Platform independent and machine readable. Available to the public free of charge and without any restriction that would impede the reuse or redistribution of the public record. Able to retain the data definitions and structure present when the data was compiled, if applicable. Advocates for government transparency and open data want legislators to make it easier for search engines, other modern communications tools, and the public to find and access agendas. Proposed Law Assembly Bill 2257 requires, on and after January 1, 2019, a local agency that has an internet website to post a prominent, direct link to the agenda for the most current meeting of its governing body on the local agency's primary homepage. AB 2257 prohibits the link from being in a contextual menu, but allows an additional link to the agenda in a contextual menu. A local agency that uses an integrated agenda management platform does not have to meet these requirements if it meets all of the following conditions: A direct link to the platform is posted on the local AB 2257 (Maienschein) 6/22/16 Page 3 of ? agency's primary homepage and the link is not in a contextual menu; All of the local agency's agendas are contained in the platform; The current agenda of the legislative body of the local agency is the first agenda available at the top of the platform webpage; and All of the agendas comply with specified requirements for formatting. AB 2257 also specifies requirements for the format of agendas, similar to the requirements for open data established in AB 169. Specifically, agendas must be posted in an open format that is: Retrievable, downloadable, indexable, and searchable by commonly used internet search applications; Platform independent and machine readable; and Available to the public free of charge and without any restriction that would impede the reuse or redistribution of the agenda. State Revenue Impact No estimate. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill . The Legislature initially enacted the Brown Act in 1953 to ensure open government and transparency in local decision-making. Over the years, it has been amended to adapt to changing circumstances and new technologies. Today, technology has changed what the reasonable expectations are for access to public meeting documents such as agendas, and new tools are available to improve transparency. AB 2257 is the next logical step in ensuring the public's access to meetings. It addresses two key obstacles that hamper access to local agency agendas. First, it makes agendas much easier to find on AB 2257 (Maienschein) 6/22/16 Page 4 of ? local agency websites by requiring a direct link on the homepage. Just as importantly, AB 2257 requires local governments to post their agendas in an open format that search engines like Google and other tools can read and catalogue. Communication technologies have advanced rapidly; it's time our local governments caught up. 2. Homepage, home rule . Local agencies already face mandates from the state to ensure that their agendas are publicly posted and that their meetings are open and accessible. These requirements can be onerous for small local agencies that don't have the resources to continually update a website. Furthermore, many local governments that have that capacity have designed their website to meet the expressed needs of their constituents, who may prize having ready access to information about permitting or jobs over a link to the most recent agenda. While well intentioned, AB 2257 imposes a potentially costly one-size-fits-all requirement on local governments, to the detriment of the public. Other bills similarly micromanage local agency websites; AB 779, which the Committee will also consider on June 29th, requires a link on the homepage to local agency compensation. These bills set a concerning precedent for micromanaging local agency websites. 3. Mandate . The California Constitution generally requires the state to reimburse local agencies for their costs when the state imposes new programs or additional duties on them. In 2014, California voters approved Proposition 42, which amended the California Constitution to eliminate the state's responsibility to pay local governments for compliance with the Brown Act and its amendments. According to the Legislative Counsel's Office, AB 2257 creates a new state-mandated local program. But this bill disclaims the state's responsibility for reimbursing local agencies by including findings and declarations that the bill amends the Brown Act and furthers its purposes. Assembly Actions Assembly Local Government Committee: 8-0 Assembly Appropriations Committee: 20-0 Assembly Floor: 77-0 AB 2257 (Maienschein) 6/22/16 Page 5 of ? Support and Opposition (6/23/16) Support : Grassroots Lab (sponsor); AFSCME; California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce; California Association of Licensed Investigators; California Business Roundtable; California Independent Oil Marketers Association; California League of Food Processors; California Manufacturers and Technology Association; California Newspaper Publishers Association; California Professional Firefighters; California Retailers Association; Californians Aware; Data Coalition; El Dorado Local Agency Formation Commission; Industrial Environmental Association; Innovate Your State; National Federation of Independent Business; SEIU California; Sunlight Foundation. Opposition : California Special Districts Association. -- END --