AB 2277, as introduced, Melendez. Local government finance: property tax revenue allocation: vehicle license fee adjustments.
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction’s portion of the annual tax increment, as defined.
Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992-93 and 1993-94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education.
Beginning with the 2004-05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities.
This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions for a city incorporating after January 1, 2004, and on or before January 1, 2012, for the 2016-17 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation.
By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
2 is amended to read:
Notwithstanding any other law, for the 2004-05 fiscal
4year and for each fiscal year thereafter, all of the following apply:
5(a) (1) (A) The auditor shall reduce the total amount of ad
6valorem property tax revenue that is otherwise required to be
7allocated to a county’s Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund
8by the countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount.
9(B) If, for the fiscal year, after complying with Section 97.68
10there is not enough ad valorem property tax revenue that is
11otherwise required to be allocated to a county Educational Revenue
12Augmentation Fund for the auditor to complete the allocation
13reduction required by
subparagraph (A), the auditor shall
14additionally reduce the total amount of ad valorem property tax
P3 1revenue that is otherwise required to be allocated to all school
2districts and community college districts in the county for that
3fiscal year by an amount equal to the difference between the
4countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount and the amount
5of ad valorem property tax revenue that is otherwise required to
6be allocated to the county Educational Revenue Augmentation
7Fund for that fiscal year. This reduction for each school district
8and community college district in the county shall be the percentage
9share of the total reduction that is equal to the proportion that the
10total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue that is otherwise
11required to be allocated to the school district or community college
12district bears to the total amount of ad valorem property tax revenue
13that is otherwise required to be allocated to all school districts and
14community college districts in a county. For purposes of this
15
subparagraph, “school districts” and “community college districts”
16do not include any districts that are excess tax school entities, as
17defined in Section 95.
18(2) The countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount shall
19be allocated to the Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation
20Fund that shall be established in the treasury of each county.
21(b) (1) The auditor shall allocate moneys in the Vehicle License
22Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund according to the following:
23(A) Each city in the county shall receive its vehicle license fee
24adjustment amount.
25(B) Each county and city and county shall receive its vehicle
26license fee adjustment amount.
27(2) The auditor
shall allocate one-half of the amount specified
28in paragraph (1) on or before January 31 of each fiscal year, and
29the other one-half on or before May 31 of each fiscal year.
30(c) For purposes of this section, all of the following apply:
31(1) “Vehicle license fee adjustment amount” for a particular
32city, county, or a city and county means, subject to an adjustment
33under paragraph (2) and Section 97.71, all of the following:
34(A) For the 2004-05 fiscal year, an amount equal to the
35difference between the following two amounts:
36(i) The estimated total amount of revenue that would have been
37deposited to the credit of the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account
38in the Transportation Tax Fund, including any amounts that would
39have been certified to the Controller by
the auditor of the County
40of Ventura under subdivision (j) of Section 98.02, as that section
P4 1read on January 1, 2004, for distribution under the law as it read
2on January 1, 2004, to the county, city and county, or city for the
32004-05 fiscal year if the fee otherwise due under the Vehicle
4License Fee Lawbegin delete (Pt.end deletebegin insert (Partend insert 5 (commencing with Section 10701)
5ofbegin delete Div.end deletebegin insert Divisionend insert 2) was 2 percent of the market value of a vehicle,
6as specified inbegin delete Sectionend deletebegin insert Sectionsend insert 10752 and 10752.1 as those
7sections read on January 1, 2004.
8(ii) The estimated total amount of revenue that is required to be
9distributed from the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account in the
10Transportation Tax Fund to the county, city and county, and each
11city in the county for the 2004-05 fiscal year under Section 11005,
12as that section read on the operative date of the act that amended
13this clause.
14(B) (i) Subject to an adjustment under clause (ii), for the
152005-06 fiscal year, the sum of the following two amounts:
16(I) The difference between the following two amounts:
17(Ia)
end delete
18begin insert(ia)end insert The actual total amount of revenue that would have been
19deposited to the credit of the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account
20in the Transportation Tax Fund, including any amounts that would
21have been certified to the Controller by the auditor of the County
22of Ventura under subdivision (j) of Section 98.02, as that section
23read on January 1, 2004, for distribution under the law as it read
24on January 1, 2004, to the county, city and county, or city for the
252004-05 fiscal year if the fee otherwise due under the Vehicle
26License Fee Law (Part 5 (commencing with Section 10701) of
27Division 2) was 2 percent of the market value of a vehicle, as
28specified in Sections 10752 and 10752.1 as those sections read on
29
January 1, 2004.
30(Ib)
end delete
31begin insert(ib)end insert The actual total amount of revenue that was distributed
32from the Motor Vehicle License Fee Account in the Transportation
33Tax Fund to the county, city and county, and each city in the county
34for the 2004-05 fiscal year under Section 11005, as that section
35read on the operative date of the act that amended this
36begin delete sub-subclause.end deletebegin insert subsubclause.end insert
37(II) The product of the following two amounts:
38(IIa)
end delete39begin insert(ia)end insert The amount described in subclause (I).
40(IIb)
end delete
P5 1begin insert(ib)end insert The percentage change from the prior fiscal year to the
2current fiscal year in gross taxable assessed valuation within the
3jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the equalized assessment
4roll for those fiscal years. For the first fiscal year for which a
5change in a city’s jurisdictional boundaries first applies, the
6percentage change in gross taxable assessed valuation from the
7prior fiscal year to the current fiscal year shall be calculated solely
8on the basis of the city’s previous jurisdictional boundaries, without
9regard to the change in that city’s jurisdictional boundaries. For
10each following fiscal year, the percentage change in gross taxable
11assessed valuation from the prior fiscal
year to the current fiscal
12year shall be calculated on the basis of the city’s current
13jurisdictional boundaries.
14(ii) The amount described in clause (i) shall be adjusted as
15follows:
16(I) If the amount described in subclause (I) of clause (i) for a
17particular city, county, or city and county is greater than the amount
18described in subparagraph (A) for that city, county, or city and
19county, the amount described in clause (i) shall be increased by
20an amount equal to this difference.
21(II) If the amount described in subclause (I) of clause (i) for a
22particular city, county, or city and county is less than the amount
23described in subparagraph (A) for that city, county, or city and
24county, the amount described in clause (i) shall be decreased by
25an amount equal to this difference.
26(C) For the 2006-07 fiscal year and for each fiscal year
27thereafter, the sum of the following two amounts:
28(i) The vehicle license fee adjustment amount for the prior fiscal
29year, if Section 97.71 and clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) did not
30apply for that fiscal year, for that city, county, and city and county.
31(ii) The product of the following two amounts:
32(I) The amount described in clause (i).
33(II) The percentage change from the prior fiscal year to the
34current fiscal year in gross taxable assessed valuation within the
35jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the equalized assessment
36roll for those fiscal years. For the first fiscal year for which a
37change in a city’s jurisdictional
boundaries first applies, the
38percentage change in gross taxable assessed valuation from the
39prior fiscal year to the current fiscal year shall be calculated solely
40on the basis of the city’s previous jurisdictional boundaries, without
P6 1regard to the change in that city’s jurisdictional boundaries. For
2each following fiscal year, the percentage change in gross taxable
3assessed valuation from the prior fiscal year to the current fiscal
4year shall be calculated on the basis of the city’s current
5jurisdictional boundaries.
6(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), “vehicle license fee
7adjustment amount,” for a city incorporating after January 1,
82004, and on or before January 1, 2012, means the following:
9(A) For the 2016-17 fiscal year, the quotient derived from the
10following fraction:
11(i) The numerator is the product of the following two amounts:
end insertbegin insert
12(I) The sum of the most recent vehicle license fee adjustment
13amounts determined for all cities in the county.
14(II) The population of the incorporating city.
end insertbegin insert
15(ii) The
denominator is the sum of the populations of all cities
16in the county.
17(B) For the 2017-18 fiscal year, and for each fiscal year
18thereafter, the sum of the following two amounts:
19(i) The vehicle license fee adjustment amount for the prior fiscal
20year.
21(ii) The product of the following two amounts:
end insertbegin insert22(I) The amount described in clause (i).
end insertbegin insert
23(II) The percentage change from the prior fiscal year to the
24current fiscal year in gross taxable assessed valuation within the
25jurisdiction of the entity, as reflected in the equalized assessment
26roll for those fiscal years.
27(2)
end delete
28begin insert(3)end insert For the 2013-14 fiscal year, the vehicle license fee
29adjustment amount that is determined under subparagraph (C) of
30paragraph (1) for the County of Orange shall be increased by
31fifty-three million dollars ($53,000,000). For the 2014-15 fiscal
32year and each fiscal year thereafter, the calculation of the vehicle
33license fee adjustment amount for the County of Orange under
34subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) shall be based on a prior fiscal
35year amount that reflects the full amount of this one-time increase
36of fifty-three million dollars ($53,000,000).
37(3)
end delete
38begin insert(4)end insert “Countywide vehicle license fee adjustment amount” means,
39for any fiscal year, the total sum of the amounts described in
P7 1paragraphsbegin delete (1)end deletebegin insert (1), (2),end insert andbegin delete (2)end deletebegin insert(3)end insert for a county or city and county,
2and each city in the county.
3(4)
end delete
4begin insert(5)end insert On or before June 30 of each fiscal year, the auditor shall
5report to the Controller the vehicle license fee adjustment amount
6for the county and each city in the county for that fiscal year.
7(d) For the 2005-06 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter,
8the amounts determined under subdivision (a) of Section 96.1, or
9any successor to that provision, shall not reflect, for a preceding
10fiscal year, any portion of any allocation required by this section.
11(e) For purposes of Section 15 of Article XI of the California
12Constitution, the allocations from a Vehicle License Fee
Property
13Tax Compensation Fund constitute successor taxes that are
14otherwise required to be allocated to counties and cities, and as
15successor taxes, the obligation to make those transfers as required
16by this section shall not be extinguished nor disregarded in any
17manner that adversely affects the security of, or the ability of, a
18county or city to pay the principal and interest on any debts or
19obligations that were funded or secured by that city’s or county’s
20allocated share of motor vehicle license fee revenues.
21(f) This section shall not be construed to do any of the following:
22(1) Reduce any allocations of excess, additional, or remaining
23funds that would otherwise have been allocated to county
24superintendents of schools, cities, counties, and cities and counties
25pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of
26subdivision (d) of Sections 97.2 and 97.3 or
Article 4 (commencing
27with Section 98) had this section not been enacted. The allocations
28required by this section shall be adjusted to comply with this
29paragraph.
30(2) Require an increased ad valorem property tax revenue
31allocation or increased tax increment allocation to a community
32redevelopment agency.
33(3) Alter the manner in which ad valorem property tax revenue
34growth from fiscal year to fiscal year is otherwise determined or
35allocated in a county.
36(4) Reduce ad valorem property tax revenue allocations required
37under Article 4 (commencing with Section 98).
38(g) Tax exchange or revenue sharing agreements, entered into
39prior to the operative date of this section, between local agencies
40or between local agencies and nonlocal agencies are deemed to be
P8 1
modified to account for the reduced vehicle license fee revenues
2resulting from the act that added this section. These agreements
3are modified in that these reduced revenues are, in kind and in lieu
4thereof, replaced with ad valorem property tax revenue from a
5Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund or an
6Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
8this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
9local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
10pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
114 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
99