BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2318 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2318 (Low) As Amended August 15, 2016 2/3 vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |80-0 |(May 31, 2016) |SENATE: | 39-0 |(August 29, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: E. & R. SUMMARY: Gives the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) jurisdiction over a state law that requires specified nonprofit organizations to disclose the sources of funds used for campaign activity. Specifically, this bill: 1)Allows the FPPC to enforce a state law that requires a nonprofit organization that receives more than 20% of its revenues from one or more local agencies to use a separate bank account for campaign activity and to publicly report campaign activity, including disclosing the sources of funds used for that activity, if certain thresholds are met. AB 2318 Page 2 2)Transfers the responsibility for administering this law from the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to the FPPC. Conforms this law to another law within the Political Reform Act (PRA) that regulates political spending by specified nonprofit organizations. Recodifies this law so that it is part of the PRA. 3)Requires disclosures made under this law to be made in the same manner as reports filed by multipurpose organizations (MPOs) that are subject to another provision of the PRA that establishes the conditions under which MPOs are required to disclose their donors. 4)Transfers the following responsibilities under this law from the FTB to the FPPC: a) Deciding whether to require an audit of reports filed by nonprofit organizations; and, b) Determining, as part of an audit or at the conclusion of an audit, whether a nonprofit organization has complied with specified provisions of state law. The Senate amendments: 1)Remove provisions of this bill that would have allowed the FPPC to enforce an existing state law that prohibits a nonprofit organization, as defined, or an officer, employee, or agent of such an organization, from using public resources that are received from a local agency, as specified, for campaign activity not authorized by law. Remove provisions of this bill that would hare recodified that law so that it was part of the PRA. AB 2318 Page 3 2)Make minor, technical, and corresponding changes. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, the FPPC indicates that it would incur first-year costs of $126,000, and ongoing annual costs of $119,000 to implement the provisions of the bill (General Fund). COMMENTS: According to the author, "AB 2318 modifies the definition of a reporting nonprofit organization and shifts the current enforcement authority from the [FTB] to the [FPPC]. This bill improves upon the existing accountability and transparency provisions by providing enforcement authority to the FPPC. The FPPC is the appropriate oversight body to promote and foster the public's trust in our state's political system. As such, AB 2318 is necessary to streamline the disclosure and reporting rules, while also synchronizing their reporting threshold requirements in an effort to reduce redundancy and maximize transparency." SB 594 (Hill), Chapter 773, Statutes of 2013, was enacted in response to concerns that public resources were being used indirectly for campaign purposes. In particular, the author of SB 594 expressed concern that revenues from a Joint Powers Authority that provides bond financing were potentially being used for campaign purposes. Subsequent to the passage of SB 594, SB 27 (Correa), Chapter 16, Statutes of 2014, established conditions under which an MPO that makes campaign contributions or expenditures is required to disclose names of its donors. Although SB 594 and SB 27 were intended to address different perceived problems, both bills regulate political activity by certain nonprofit organizations. This bill changes the reporting requirements of SB 594 to be more consistent with reports filed pursuant to SB 27, moves certain provisions of SB 594 into the PRA, and makes the FPPC responsible for AB 2318 Page 4 administering and enforcing parts of SB 594. California voters passed an initiative, Proposition 9, in 1974 that created the FPPC and codified significant restrictions and prohibitions on candidates, officeholders and lobbyists. That initiative is commonly known as the PRA. Amendments to the PRA that are not submitted to the voters, such as those contained in this bill, must further the purposes of the initiative and require a two-thirds vote of both houses of the Legislature. As approved by the Assembly, this bill proposed to give the FPPC jurisdiction over two related state laws that govern the use of certain resources by nonprofit organizations for campaign activity. The Senate amendments narrow the bill so that the FPPC is given jurisdiction over just one of those two laws, thereby leaving the administration and enforcement of the other law unchanged, except for various minor, technical, clarifying, and corresponding changes. This bill, as amended in the Senate, is generally consistent with Assembly actions. Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion of this bill. Analysis Prepared by: Ethan Jones / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094 FN: 0004069 AB 2318 Page 5