BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2320 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2320 (Calderon and Low) As Amended May 4, 2016 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Privacy |6-3 |Chau, Calderon, |Wilk, Baker, Gatto | | | |Cooper, Dababneh, | | | | |Gordon, Low | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Local |8-0 |Eggman, Waldron, | | |Government | |Alejo, Chiu, Cooley, | | | | |Beth Gaines, Gordon, | | | | |Linder | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |19-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bonilla, Bonta, | | | | |Calderon, Chang, | | | | |McCarty, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Chau, Holden, | | | | |Jones, Obernolte, | | | | |Quirk, Santiago, | | | | |Wagner, Weber, Wood | | AB 2320 Page 2 | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Prohibits the operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in a manner that violates a protective order, constitutes stalking, interferes with emergency response personnel, or facilitates delivery of contraband into a jail or prison; and gives a judge the authority to prohibit registered sex offenders from using a UAS if it would be in the public interest. Specifically, this bill: 1)Makes it a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and a year in county jail, as provided, to use a UAS to intentionally and knowingly violate a protective order that prohibits a person from coming within a specified distance of another person. 2)Specifies that flying a UAS within the distance prohibited or capturing images of the person covered by a protective order is a violation of that order. 3)Provides that if the violation of a protective order by a UAS results in physical injury (or is a second violation within a year), the violation is punishable by a fine of up to $2,000 and not less than 30 days (but no more than one year) in county jail. 4)Authorizes a judge to order a person who is required to register as a sex offender from operating a UAS if such a restriction is in the public interest. 5)Makes it a misdemeanor to use a UAS to view the scene of an emergency in a way that impedes police officers, firefighters, emergency medical, or other emergency personnel, or military AB 2320 Page 3 personnel in the performance of their emergency duties. 6)Makes it a misdemeanor to use a UAS to stalk another person by willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly following or willfully and maliciously harassing another person and making a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family; and makes using a UAS to stalk someone when there is a temporary restraining order in place a felony. 7)Makes it a felony to use a UAS to bring contraband into a jail or state prison. 8)Makes various technical and clarifying changes to current law. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)Nonreimbursable costs to local governments for enforcement and punishment, offset to some extent by fine revenues. 2)Potential, but likely minor state incarceration costs for felony convictions. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose of this bill. This bill seeks to protect personal privacy and public safety by amending a variety of existing laws to clarify that a violation of those laws can be committed by use of a UAS, and also by prohibiting the regulation of UAS ownership and operation by local AB 2320 Page 4 governments. This bill is author-sponsored. 2)Using UAS to violate protective orders or stalk someone. Since UAS can be used to bother or capture images of a person, this bill specifies that using a UAS to enter the prohibited distance specified in a protective order is a violation of the order and subject to the same penalties as other violations of protective orders. Similarly, stalking laws prohibit a person from repeatedly following or harassing another person in a way that puts that person in fear. This bill specifies that using a UAS to stalk someone constitutes a violation of stalking laws that apply when physically following or harassing someone. 3)Sex offenders and UAS. This bill authorizes a judge to prohibit a person who must register as a sex offender from using a UAS if it would be in the public interest. Under current law, a person convicted of any felony is prohibited from possessing a firearm. 4)Emergencies and UAS interference. In 2015, California experienced a number of UAS interferences with emergency responses to wildfires throughout the state. This bill explicitly prohibits any use of a UAS that interferes with police, fire, medical, or other emergency or military personnel as they respond to natural or manmade emergencies. 5)Prisons and UAS. According to the New York Times, "some would-be smugglers are experimenting with [UAS] as an alternative to established methods like paying off officers, hiding contraband in incoming laundry and throwing packages disguised as rocks over fences." (Airmail Via Drones Is Vexing For Prisons, New York Times, April 22, 2015) This bill makes it a felony to use a UAS to deliver contraband to a prison or jail. AB 2320 Page 5 6)The federal preemption issue. Once the FAA has finished promulgating regulations governing the commercial deployment of UAS, which is expected to occur in the next year or two, a future court may find that those federal regulations preempt certain state laws, or parts thereof - such as this one, if passed - but much remains uncertain. Analysis Prepared by: Jennie Bretschneider / P. & C.P. / (916) 319-2200 FN: 0002964