BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 2327 (Cooley) - Contacting or communicating with a minor
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: March 28, 2016         |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 7 - 0      |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: Yes                    |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 1, 2016    |Consultant: Jolie Onodera       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. 

          Bill  
          Summary:  AB 2327 would expand the crime of contacting or  
          communicating with a minor, with the intent to commit specified  
          sexual offenses involving the minor, to include attempting to  
          contact or communicate with a minor with the intent to commit  
          human trafficking.


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  Potentially significant increase in state costs,  
          potentially in excess of hundreds of thousands of dollars  
          (General Fund) annually, for new and/or lengthier commitments to  
          state prison. The potential state prison sentence for contacting  
          a minor with the intent to commit human trafficking could range  
          between 2.5 years, 4 years, or 6 years, or 7.5 years to life for  
          cases involving force, fraud, or fear. For repeat offenders, an  
          additional and consecutive state prison sentence of 5 years  
          could be imposed.  


          Background:  Existing law specifies that a person who contacts or  
          communicates with a minor, or attempts to contact or communicate  







          AB 2327 (Cooley)                                       Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
          with a minor, who knows or reasonably should know that the  
          person is a minor, with intent to commit any of the following  
          offenses involving the minor shall be punished by imprisonment  
          in the state prison for the term prescribed for an attempt to  
          commit the intended offense:  
           Kidnapping; 

           Kidnapping for ransom, reward, extortion, robbery, or rape; 

           Rape; 

           Sexual penetration other than rape or sodomy; 

           Willful harm or injury to a child; 

           Sodomy; 

           Lewd and lascivious acts with a minor; 

           Oral copulation; 

           Harmful matter sent to minor; 

           Forcible sexual penetration; and 

           Child pornography.  (Penal Code (PC) § 288.3 (a).)



          Existing law provides that the punishment for the offense of  
          contacting or communicating with a minor, or attempting to  
          contact or communicate with a minor with the intent to commit an  
          intended offense, is the same as an attempt to commit the  
          intended offense. (PC § 288.3 (a).) California criminal law  
          dictates that the punishment for attempt is generally one half  
          the sentence of the completed offense. (PC § 664.)


          Existing law specifies that "contacts or communicates with"  
          shall include direct and indirect contact or communication that  
          may be achieved personally or by use of an agent or agency, any  
          print medium, any postal service, a common carrier or  
          communication common carrier, any electronic communications  
          system, or any telecommunications, wire, computer, or radio  








          AB 2327 (Cooley)                                       Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          
          communications device or system. (PC § 288.3 (b).) 

          Existing law provides that a person convicted of a violation of  
          contacting or communicating with a minor with the intent to  
          commit a specified offense who has previously been convicted of  
          a violation of contacting or communicating with a minor with the  
          intent to commit a specified offense shall be punished by an  
          additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state  
          prison for five years. (PC § 288.3 (c).)




          Proposed Law:  
           This bill would add human trafficking to the list of target  
          crimes subject to the offense of contacting or communicating  
          with a minor (PC § 288.3) with the intent to commit an offense  
          involving the minor.


          Related  
          Legislation:  AB 2513 (Williams) 2016 would impose a sentence  
          enhancement of one year in state prison for a human trafficking  
          conviction in which the defendant recruited or enticed the  
          victim from a shelter or placement designed to serve runaway  
          youth, foster children, homeless persons, or victims of human  
          trafficking or domestic violence. This bill is scheduled to be  
          heard today by this Committee.
          Prior Legislation:  Proposition 83, November 2006 General  
          Election, also known as "Jessica's Law," increased the penalties  
          for specified sex offenses and mandated that registered sex  
          offenders who have been convicted of a felony sex offense to be  
          monitored by GPS devices while on parole and for the remainder  
          of their lives. Proposition 83 also established the crime being  
          expanded under the provisions of this bill. 




          Staff  
          Comments:  By expanding the felony offense of contacting or  
          communicating with a minor with the intent to commit a sex crime  
          to include the offense of human trafficking, this bill could  
          result in new commitments to state prison, as well as  








          AB 2327 (Cooley)                                       Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
          commitments to state prison with longer sentences.
          Arrest data from the Department of Justice (DOJ) indicates  
          nearly 250 arrests annually under the specified offense of  
          communicating with a minor with the intent to commit a specified  
          crime, with an average of 82 annual arrests (33 percent) leading  
          to convictions. It is unknown how many new arrests and  
          subsequent convictions would occur due to expanding the offense  
          to include communicating with a minor with the intent to commit  
          human trafficking, but to the extent additional prosecutions  
          could proceed, additional workload and costs would be imposed on  
          the courts.


          The prison term triad for the offense of human trafficking  
          pursuant to PC § 236.1(c) is five years, eight years, or 12  
          years, and additionally includes a fine of up to $500,000. For  
          cases in which the offense involves force, fear, fraud, deceit,  
          coercion, violence, duress, menace, or threat of unlawful injury  
          to the victim or to another person, the punishment is 15 years  
          to life and a fine of up to $500,000. As the sentence for the  
          attempt to commit a crime is generally one half the sentence of  
          the completed offense, the potential prison term triad under the  
          provisions of this measure is 2.5 years, four years, or six  
          years, and a fine of up to $250,000, or in cases involving  
          force, fraud, or fear, a potential prison term of 7.5 years to  
          life and a fine of up to $250,000.


          The magnitude of new costs for commitments to state prison would  
          be dependent on the number of convictions and the sentencing  
          terms attached to those offenses. While costs in any one year  
          may not be significant, the cumulative effect over time of  
          overlapping sentences could be substantial. 


          The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the CDCR to reduce the prison  
          population to 137.5 percent of the prison system's design  
          capacity by February 28, 2016. Although public safety  
          realignment has achieved significant reductions in the prison  
          population, and the 2016-17 Governor's Budget projects meeting  
          the population cap in the near-term, the analysis by the  
          Legislative Analyst's Office suggests that CDCR's long-term  
          prison caseload will likely exceed this cap. Because  
          California's institutions are projected to exceed the population  








          AB 2327 (Cooley)                                       Page 4 of  
          ?
          
          
          limit, any near-term and future increases to the state's prison  
          population would likely require the state to pursue one of  
          several options including contracting-out for additional bed  
          space or releasing current inmates early onto parole. Both  
          alternatives would result in additional state costs.




                                      -- END --