AB 2350,
as amended, O'Donnell. Englishbegin delete learners: English language proficiency assessment.end deletebegin insert learners.end insert
Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt curriculum frameworks and evaluation criteria that are aligned to specified content standards for English language arts on or before July 30, 2014.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would define the terms “designated English language development” and “integrated English language development” for purposes of the English Language Arts/English Development Framework adopted by the state board, as specified. The bill would state that a middle or high school pupil who is enrolled in an English language development course or is classified as an English learner shall not be prevented from enrolling in specified other courses required for graduation or in courses that meet specified college admission standards, and would require credit toward graduation to be conferred for courses designed for long-term English learners. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the State Department of Education to contract for the development of a video series demonstrating best practices for implementing designated and integrated English language development, and to make the video series available for use by local educational agencies.
end insertbegin insertThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
end insertExisting law requires each school district that has one or more pupils who are English learners and, to the extent required by federal law, each county office of education and each charter school, to assess the English language development of each of those pupils in order to determine their level of proficiency. Existing law requires the State Department of Education, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to establish procedures for conducting the assessment and for the reclassification of a pupil from English learner to English proficient. Existing law requires that the assessment primarily use the English language development test identified or developed, or developed or acquired, by the Superintendent pursuant to a specified statute.
end deleteThis bill would delete English language development tests that are identified or acquired, but not developed, from tests that may be used by the assessment referenced above. The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes to this provision.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3
(a) California is home to the largest population of English
4learners in the country, and one in three English learners in the
5United States resides in California.
6
(b) There are approximately 1.4 million English learners in
7California public schools. About 2.7 million pupils speak a
8language other than English in their homes, representing about
943 percent of the state’s public school enrollment.
P3 1
(c) California’s English learner pupils score substantially lower
2on state assessments than non-English learner pupils. While there
3has been incremental growth in achievement among pupils in the
4general population, scores for English learners have largely
5remained static, widening the achievement gap between English
6learners and their peers over time.
7
(d) On the 2015 administration of the California Assessment of
8Student Performance, 11 percent of English learners in all grades
9met or exceeded standard in English language arts/literacy and
1011 percent in math, compared with 69 percent and 55 percent for
11those subjects, respectively, for pupils proficient in English.
12
(e) The English Language Arts/English Language Development
13Framework adopted by the State Board of Education in 2014
14represents an important state
endorsement of the use of both
15designated English language development and the integration of
16English language development across the curriculum. This
17combined approach will require major changes in teaching and
18learning for all pupils, including English learners, and there is a
19need for training for, and technical assistance to, teachers and
20administrators on implementing these instructional reforms.
21
(f) Recent research has found that English learners are less
22likely than non-English learners to be enrolled in core academic
23subject courses and, as a result, earn fewer credits than
24non-English learner pupils. Research has further found that limited
25access to English language arts is largely due to English language
26development classes being used as substitutes for, rather than
27complements to, English language arts, and due to the enrollment
28of elementary and secondary English learners in intervention
29classes for English language arts and math
that are not designed
30for the learners’ language and academic needs.
31
(g) English language development classes aligned to the state
32English Language Development standards are designed to give
33access to core academic subjects while developing English
34proficiency, and are part of the academic core for English learners.
35
(h) There are many options for addressing the issues of access
36and course offerings for English Learners in middle and high
37school.
38
(i) Graduation rates for English learners are lower than for the
39general population and for other subgroups of students. According
40to the State Department of
Education, the overall 2013-14
P4 1four-year cohort graduation was 81 percent, while the rate for
2English learners was 65 percent, the lowest of any subgroup
3besides students in special education. The dropout rate for English
4learners, at 21 percent, was the highest of any subgroup.
Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 60080) is added
6to Chapter 1 of Part 33 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education
7Code, to read:
8
Except for pupils participating in articulated newcomer
12programs, a middle or high school pupil who is enrolled in an
13English language development course or who is classified as an
14English learner shall not be prevented from doing either of the
15following:
16
(a) Enrolling in core curriculum courses in English language
17arts or any other course required for graduation or to meet the
18a-g subject requirements for admission to the University of
19California or the California State University.
20
(b) Taking a full course load in core subjects required for
21graduation or to meet the a-g subject requirements for admission
22to the University of California or the California State
University.
If a local educational agency offers a course designed
24for long-term English learners, the course shall confer credits in
25English language arts necessary to meet graduation requirements.
26It is the intent of the Legislature that local educational agencies
27submit those courses to the University of California and California
28State University for approval to meet the a-g subject requirements
29for admission.
(a) The English Language Arts/English Language
31Development Framework adopted by the state board in 2014 states
32that English learners at all English proficiency levels and at all
33ages require both integrated English language development and
34specialized attention to their particular language learning needs,
35otherwise known as designated English language development, as
36part of their daily curriculum.
37
(b) The following definitions shall apply to the English Language
38Arts/English Language Development Framework referenced in
39subdivision (a):
P5 1
(1) “Designated English language development” means
2instruction designed for English learners according to their level
3of English proficiency
to overcome language barriers in a
4reasonable amount of time, during a protected time in the regular
5schoolday, in which teachers use the California English Language
6Development Standards as the focal standards in ways that build
7into and from content instruction in order to develop the critical
8language that English learners need for content learning in
9English.
10
(2) “Integrated English language development” means
11instruction in which all teachers with English learners in their
12classrooms, regardless of the course content, use the California
13English Language Development Standards in tandem with the
14California state standards.
(a) The department shall contract for the development
16of a series of videos demonstrating best practices for implementing
17designated and integrated English language development in
18transitional kindergarten to grade 12, inclusive, and shall make
19the series available on the department’s Internet Web site.
20
(b) In developing the video series, the department shall compile
21program models that address the structuring of the school day to
22allow for instruction in the full curriculum and in English language
23development. The department shall include information on how
24to implement these models in the series.
25
(c) In developing the video series, the department shall convene
26a group of
experts and request public comment.
27
(d) The video series shall be designed to assist local educational
28agencies in providing instruction in designated English language
29development and integrated English language development across
30different content areas.
31
(e) By the beginning of the 2017-18 academic year, the video
32series shall be completed and made available for voluntary use
33by local educational agencies.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
35this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
36local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
37pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
384 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
Section 313 of the Education Code is amended
40to read:
(a) Each school district that has one or more pupils who
2are English learners and, to the extent required by federal law,
3each county office of education and each charter school shall assess
4the English language development of each pupil in order to
5determine the level of proficiency for purposes of this chapter.
6(b) The department, with the approval of the state board, shall
7establish procedures for conducting the assessment required
8pursuant to subdivision (a) and for the reclassification of a pupil
9from English learner to English proficient.
10(c) Commencing with the 2000-01 school year until subdivision
11(d) is implemented, the
assessment shall be conducted upon initial
12enrollment, and annually, thereafter, during a period of time
13determined by the Superintendent and the state board. The annual
14assessments shall continue until the pupil is redesignated as English
15proficient. The assessment shall primarily use the English language
16development test developed by the Superintendent pursuant to
17Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 60810) of Part 33 of Division
184 of Title 2.
19(d) (1) This subdivision shall not be implemented unless and
20until the department receives written documentation from the
21United States Department of Education that federal law permits
22the implementation of the changes set forth in this subdivision or
23until the 2013-14 school year, whichever occurs later.
24(2) The
assessment shall be conducted annually during a period
25that commences on the day upon which 55 percent of the
26instructional year is completed through July 1 of that calendar
27year. Annual assessments shall continue until the pupil is
28redesignated as English proficient. The annual assessment shall
29primarily use the English language development test developed
30by the Superintendent pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with
31Section 60810) of Part 33 of Division 4 of Title 2.
32(3) The assessment shall be conducted upon the initial
33enrollment of a pupil in order to provide information to be used
34to determine if the pupil is an English learner.
35(A) If the initial enrollment of a pupil occurs on a date outside
36of the testing period identified pursuant to paragraph (2), the prior
37
year’s annual assessment for the grade in which the pupil is
38enrolling shall be used for this purpose.
39(B) If the initial enrollment of a pupil occurs on a date within
40the testing period identified pursuant to paragraph (2), the initial
P7 1assessment of the pupil shall be conducted as part of the annual
2assessment conducted pursuant to paragraph (2).
3(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), a school district shall assess
4the English language development of a pupil pursuant to this
5section no more than one time per school year.
6(e) The assessment conducted pursuant to subdivision (d) shall
7be conducted in a manner consistent with federal statutes and
8regulations.
9(f) The
reclassification procedures developed by the department
10shall use multiple criteria in determining whether to reclassify a
11pupil as proficient in English, including, but not limited to, all of
12the following:
13(1) Assessment of language proficiency using an objective
14assessment instrument, including, but not necessarily limited to,
15the English language development test that is developed pursuant
16to Section 60810.
17(2) Teacher evaluation, including, but not necessarily limited
18to, a review of the pupil’s curriculum mastery.
19(3) Parental opinion and consultation.
20(4) Comparison of the performance of the pupil in basic skills
21against an empirically established
range of performance in basic
22skills based upon the performance of English proficient pupils of
23the same age, that demonstrates whether the pupil is sufficiently
24proficient in English to participate effectively in a curriculum
25designed for pupils of the same age whose native language is
26English.
27(g) This section does not preclude a school district or county
28office of education from testing English learners more than once
29in a school year if the school district or county office of education
30chooses to do so.
O
98