Amended in Senate June 28, 2016

Amended in Assembly May 27, 2016

Amended in Assembly April 19, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 28, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2350


Introduced by Assembly Member O'Donnell

February 18, 2016


An act to amend Section 44253.2 of, and to add Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 60080) to Chapter 1 of Part 33 of Division 4 of Title 2 of, the Education Code, relating to English learners.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2350, as amended, O'Donnell. English learners.

Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt curriculum frameworks and evaluation criteria that are aligned to specified content standards for English language arts on or before July 30, 2014.

This bill would define the terms “designated English language development” and “integrated English language development” for purposes of the English Language Arts/English Development Framework adopted by the state board, as specified. The bill would specifybegin delete thatend deletebegin insert that, except as provided,end insert a middle or high school pupil who is enrolled in an English language development course or is classified as an English learner shall not be prevented from enrolling in specified other courses required for graduation, grade promotion, or meeting specified college admissionbegin delete standards,end deletebegin insert standards. The bill would require English language development courses designed for long-term English learners to be sufficiently rigorous to confer credit in English language arts necessary for grade promotion or graduationend insert and would require creditbegin delete toward graduationend delete to be conferred forbegin delete courses designed for long-term English learners, except as specified.end deletebegin insert those courses.end insert By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.begin delete The bill would require the State Department of Education to contract for the development of a video series demonstrating best practices for implementing designated and integrated English language development, and to make the video series available for use by local educational agencies and charter schools. The bill would also require the department to revise its existing research-based guidance document on improving the education of English learners.end delete

Existing law authorizes the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to issue an authorization to teach specially designed content instruction delivered in English, as defined, to English learner pupils.

This bill would revise the definition of “specially designed content instruction delivered in English” for purposes of specified teacher credentialing provisions.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) California is home to the largest population of English
4learners in the country, and one in three English learners in the
5United States resides in California.

6(b) There are approximately 1.4 million English learners in
7California public schools. About 2.7 million pupils speak a
8language other than English in their homes, representing about 43
9percent of the state’s public school enrollment.

P3    1(c) California’s English learner pupils score substantially lower
2on state assessments than non-English learner pupils. While there
3has been incremental growth in achievement among pupils in the
4general population, scores for English learners have largely
5remained static, widening the achievement gap between English
6learners and their peers over time.

7(d) On the 2015 administration of the California Assessment of
8Student Performance, 11 percent of English learners in all grades
9met or exceeded standards in English language arts/literacy and
1011 percent in math, compared with 69 percent and 55 percent for
11those subjects, respectively, for pupils proficient in English.

12(e) The English Language Arts/English Language Development
13Framework adopted by the State Board of Education in 2014
14represents an important state endorsement of the use of both
15designated English language development and the integration of
16English language development across the curriculum. This
17combined approach will require major changes in teaching and
18learning for all pupils, including English learners, and there is a
19need for training for, and technical assistance to, teachers and
20administrators on implementing these instructional reforms.

21(f) Recent research has found that English learners are less likely
22than non-English learners to be enrolled in core academic subject
23courses and, as a result, earn fewer credits than non-English learner
24pupils. Research has further found that limited access to English
25language arts is largely due to English language development
26classes being used as substitutes for, rather than complements to,
27English language arts, and due to the enrollment of elementary
28and secondary English learners in intervention classes for English
29language arts and math that are not designed for English learners’
30language and academic needs.

31(g) Graduation rates for English learners are lower than for the
32general population and for other subgroups of pupils. According
33to the State Department of Education, the overall 2013-14
34four-year cohort graduation rate was 81 percent, while the rate for
35English learners was 65 percent, the lowest of any subgroup besides
36pupils in special education. The dropout rate for English learners,
37at 21 percent, was the highest of any subgroup.

38(h) English language development classes aligned to the state
39English Language Development standards are designed to give
P4    1access to core academic subjects while developing English
2proficiency, and are part of the academic core for English learners.

3(i) There are many options for addressing the issues of access
4and course offerings for English Learners in middle and high
5school.

6

SEC. 2.  

Section 44253.2 of the Education Code is amended to
7read:

8

44253.2.  

For purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall
9have the following meanings, unless the context otherwise requires:

10(a) “Instruction for English language development” means
11instruction designed specifically for English learner pupils to
12develop their listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills in
13English.

14(b) “Specially designed content instruction delivered in English”
15or “specially designed academic instruction in English” means
16instruction in a subject area, delivered in English, that is specially
17designed to meet the needs of English learner pupils, and the focus
18of which is on instruction of the state academic content standards
19and on increasing the comprehensibility of academic content in
20courses normally provided to fluent-English-proficient and
21English-only pupils.

22(c) “Content instruction delivered in the primary language”
23means instruction in a subject area delivered in the primary
24language of the pupil.

25(d) “Instruction for primary language development” means
26instruction designed to develop a pupil’s listening, speaking,
27reading, and writing skills in the primary language of the pupil.

28(e) “Culture and cultural diversity” means an understanding of
29human relations, including the following:

30(1) The nature and content of culture.

31(2) begin deleteCross cultural end deletebegin insertCross-cultural end insertcontact and interactions.

32(3) Cultural diversity in the United States and California.

33(4) Approaches to providing instruction responsive to the
34diversity of the pupil population.

35(5) Recognizing and responding to behavior related to bias based
36on the characteristics listed in Section 220.

37(6) Techniques for the peaceful resolution of conflict.

38

SEC. 3.  

Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 60080) is added
39to Chapter 1 of Part 33 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education
40Code
, to read:

 

P5    1Article 5.5.  English Learners
2

 

3

60080.  

(a) The English Language Arts/English Language
4Development Framework adopted by the state board pursuant to
5Section 60207 states that English learners at all English proficiency
6levels and at all ages require a comprehensive program of English
7language development that includes both integrated English
8language development and specialized attention to their particular
9language learning needs, otherwise known as designated English
10language development, as part of their daily curriculum.

11(b) The following definitions shall apply to the English
12Language Arts/English Language Development Framework
13referenced in subdivision (a):

14(1) “Designated English language development” means
15 instruction designed for English learners according to their level
16of English proficiency to overcome language barriers in a
17reasonable amount of time, during a protected time in the regular
18schoolday, in which teachers use the California English Language
19Development Standards as the focal standards in ways that build
20into and from content instruction in order to develop the critical
21language that English learners need for content learning in English.

22(2) “Integrated English language development” means
23instruction in which all teachers with English learners in their
24classrooms, regardless of the course content, use the California
25English Language Development Standards in tandem with the
26California state standards.

27

60081.  

(a) A middle or high school pupil who is enrolled in
28an English language development course or who is classified as
29an English learner shall not be prevented from doing either of the
30following:

31(1) Enrolling in core curriculum courses in English language
32arts or any other course required for graduation, grade promotion,
33or meeting the a-g subject requirements for admission to the
34University of California or the California State University.

35(2) Taking a full course load in core subjects required for
36graduation, grade promotion, or meeting the a-g subject
37requirements for admission to the University of California or the
38California State University.

39(b) begin insert(1)end insertbegin insertend insertSubdivision (a) shall not apply to a pupil participating
40inbegin delete an articulated newcomer programend deletebegin insert a program designed to meet
P6    1the academic and transitional needs of newly arrived immigrantsend insert

2 unless the pupil meets the local educational agency’s exit criteria
3for transition into a general education program.begin delete For purposes of
4this section, “articulated newcomer program” means a separate,
5sometimes self-contained program that meets all of the following
6criteria:end delete

begin delete

7(1) The program is designed to meet the academic and
8transitional needs of newly arrived immigrants.

9(2) Instruction is aligned with state academic content standards
10in content areas for which standards are adopted.

11(3) Instruction for learning English is aligned with English
12language development standards.

13(4) When possible, instruction in the core subjects of
14mathematics, science, and history-social science are offered in the
15pupil’s primary language.

end delete
begin insert

16
(2) The department may provide guidance on the implementation
17of this subdivision.

end insert
18

60082.  

If a local educational agency offers an English language
19development course designed for long-term English learners, the
20course shallbegin delete confer creditsend deletebegin insert be sufficiently rigorous to confer credit
21and shall confer creditend insert
in English language arts necessary to meet
22grade promotion or graduation requirements. It is the intent of the
23Legislature that local educational agencies submit those courses
24to the University of Californiabegin delete and California State Universityend delete for
25approval to meet thebegin delete a-g subject requirements for admission.end delete
26
begin insert subject matter requirements for purposes of recognition for college
27admission pursuant to Section 66205.5.end insert

begin delete
28

60083.  

(a) The department shall contract for the development
29of a series of videos demonstrating best practices for implementing
30designated and integrated English language development in
31transitional kindergarten to grade 12, inclusive, and shall make
32the series available on the department’s Internet Web site. In order
33to provide a companion resource to the video series, the department
34shall revise its existing research-based guidance document on
35improving the education of English learners. This document may
36include guidance on the implementation of Sections 60081 and
3760082.

38(b) In developing the video series and research document, the
39department shall compile program models that address the
40implementation of designated and integrated instruction during
P7    1the schoolday that allows pupils to access English language
2development and academic content. The department shall include
3information on how to implement these models.

4(c) In developing the video series and research document, the
5department shall convene a group of experts and request public
6input.

7(d) By the beginning of the 2019-20 school year, the video
8series and research document shall be completed and made
9available for voluntary use by local educational agencies and
10charter schools.

11(e) Implementation of this section is contingent upon funding
12being provided for this purpose in the annual Budget Act or another
13 statute.

end delete
14

SEC. 4.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
15this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
16local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
17pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
184 of Title 2 of the Government Code.



O

    95