BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2389 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2389 (Ridley-Thomas) As Amended May 9, 2016 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Elections |5-2 |Weber, Gordon, Low, |Harper, Travis | | | |Mullin, Nazarian |Allen | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Local |8-0 |Eggman, Waldron, | | |Government | |Mullin, Bonilla, | | | | |Chiu, Cooley, Gordon, | | | | |Linder | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Permits a special district to change the method of electing its governing board members from at-large to a by-district method of election without receiving voter approval. Specifically, this bill: 1)Authorizes the governing body of a special district to adopt a AB 2389 Page 2 resolution, without being required to submit the resolution to the voters for approval that requires members of its governing body to be elected using district-based elections. 2)Requires the resolution to include a declaration that the change in the method of electing members of the governing body is in furtherance of the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) of 2001. 3)Defines a "special district," for the purposes for these provisions, to mean an agency of the state formed pursuant to general law or special act for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions within limited boundaries. Provides that a "special district" does not include a city, county, city and county, school or community college district, special assessment district, or a district with appointed members on its governing board. FISCAL EFFECT: None. This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel. COMMENTS: According to the author, "Current law provides for different forms of government for special districts in California. Depending on the type of district, a special district can be organized so that members of the governing board are elected at-large or are elected using districts. In jurisdictions that have districts, the districts can be organized such that the registered voters in the entire district vote for governing board members from each of the districts (known as "from district" elections), or the jurisdiction can be organized so that only the registered voters in a district vote in the election to choose the board member from that area (known as "by district" elections). In either case, a candidate for the governing body must reside in the district in which he or she is running. AB 2389 Page 3 "The CVRA is designed to protect against at-large election systems that dilute minority voting rights. As a result of the CVRA, local governments throughout the state have been transitioning from at-large to district-based elections. If a special district wishes to move from at-large elections to a district-based method of election to address concerns under the CVRA, existing law provides no uniform process for accomplishing that conversion. "[A] voter approval requirement, however, can make it difficult and costly for jurisdictions to proactively transition to district-based elections in order to address potential liability under the CVRA. AB 2389 allows a special district that is concerned about liability under the CVRA to voluntarily convert from at-large to district-based elections without the expense of a ballot initiative. This bill mirrors a similar process that is already in place for general law cities with populations of fewer than 100,000 people." SB 976 (Polanco), Chapter 129, Statutes of 2002, enacted the CVRA to address racial block voting in at-large elections for local office in California. In areas where racial block voting occurs, an at-large method of election can dilute the voting rights of minority communities if the majority typically votes to support candidates that differ from the candidates who are preferred by minority communities. In such situations, breaking a jurisdiction up into districts can result in districts in which a minority community can elect the candidate of its choice or otherwise have the ability to influence the outcome of an election. Accordingly, the CVRA prohibits an at-large method of election from being imposed or applied in a political subdivision in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class of voters to elect the candidate of its choice or to AB 2389 Page 4 influence the outcome of an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgement of the rights of voters who are members of the protected class. In many cases, local government bodies must receive voter approval to move from an at-large method of election to a district-based method of election for selecting governing board members. This voter approval requirement can make it difficult for jurisdictions to proactively transition to district-based elections in order to address potential liability under the CVRA. If a jurisdiction attempts to transition from at-large to district-based elections to address CVRA concerns, but the voters reject the proposal, the jurisdiction nonetheless remains subject to a lawsuit under the CVRA. Furthermore, to the extent that there is racially polarized voting on the question of whether to transition from at-large to district-based elections, the results of the vote on that question could provide further evidence for a lawsuit under the CVRA. As a result, many jurisdictions have sought ways to transition from at-large to district-based elections without having to receive voter approval for such a change. Please see the policy committee analyses for a full discussion of this bill. Analysis Prepared by: Nichole Becker / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094 FN: 0002919 AB 2389 Page 5