BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |AB 2389 |Hearing |6/29/16 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Ridley-Thomas |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |5/9/16 |Fiscal: |No | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Weinberger | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Special districts: district-based elections: reapportionment Allows a special district's governing board, without having to seek voter approval, to change from an at-large to a by-district method of electing the district's governing board members. Background Unlike counties and cities, which deliver a wide range of public services over large areas, special districts offer focused services, delivering just one or two services to specific geographic areas where the recipients are willing to pay. About 2,100 of the state's special districts are independent districts, which have their own separate governing boards that are comprised of members who are either elected by the districts' own voters or appointed to serve for fixed terms. Most independent special districts have elected boards of directors. For those that do, state law says that the statutes that provide for the creation of a particular special district or type of special district govern whether directors of a district are elected by divisions or by the district at large. An "at-large" method of election allows a voter residing anywhere within the local government's boundaries to vote for any candidate for the governing board. A "district-based" method of election - sometimes called a "by district" election - allows a voter to vote only for a candidate who runs and resides AB 2389 (Ridley-Thomas) 5/9/16 Page 2 of ? in the same geographical district in which the voter resides. The California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) prohibits an at-large method of election from being imposed or applied in a political subdivision (including a special district) in a manner that impairs the ability of a protected class of voters to elect the candidate of its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as a result of the dilution or the abridgement of the rights of voters who are members of a protected class (SB 976, Polanco, 2002). The CVRA was enacted to address racial block voting in at-large elections for local office in California. In areas where racial block voting occurs, an at-large method of election can dilute the voting rights of a protected class of voters if a majority usually votes for candidates who differ from candidates who are preferred by the protected class of voters. In such situations, breaking up a jurisdiction into districts can result in districts in which a protected class of voters can elect the candidate of its choice or otherwise have the power to influence the outcome of an election. If a judge finds that a city's at-large election method violates the CVRA, state law requires the court to implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections. The numerous statutes that govern the methods that special districts use to elect their governing boards vary widely. Some statutes require that special district boards must obtain voter approval to switch from at-large to district-based elections. State law doesn't allow some other types of special districts to use district-based election at all. Because a growing number of districts are seeking to transition to district-based elections in response to concerns about compliance with the CVRA, some public officials want the Legislature to allow those special districts to adopt district-based elections without having to seek voter approval. Proposed Law Assembly Bill 2389 allows the governing body of a special district to adopt a resolution, without being required to submit the resolution to the voters for approval, requiring members of its governing body to be elected using district-based elections. The resolution must include a declaration that the change in AB 2389 (Ridley-Thomas) 5/9/16 Page 3 of ? the method of electing members of the governing body is in furtherance of the purposes of the CVRA. AB 2389 defines a "special district," for the purposes for these provisions, to mean an agency of the state formed pursuant to general law or special act for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions within limited boundaries. The bill provides that a "special district" does not include a city, county, city and county, school or community college district, special assessment district, or a district with appointed members on its governing board. The bill makes other conforming changes to state law. State Revenue Impact No estimate. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill . If a special district wishes to move from at-large elections to a district-based method of election to address concerns under the CVRA, existing law provides no uniform process for accomplishing that conversion. A voter approval requirement can make it difficult and costly for jurisdictions to proactively transition to district-based elections in order to address potential liability under the CVRA. AB 2389 allows a special district that is concerned about liability under the CVRA to voluntarily convert from at-large to district-based elections without the expense of a ballot initiative. This bill mirrors a similar process that the Legislature enacted for general law cities with populations of fewer than 100,000 people (SB 493, Cannella, 2015). AB 2389 doesn't force any special district to alter its current method of electing board members and doesn't prevent a district from seeking voter approval for switching to a district-based election method if it chooses to do so. The bill simply provides a tool that can be used by special district officials who wish to avoid unnecessary costs and delays by expediting their districts' conversion to district-based elections to comply with the CVRA. AB 2389 (Ridley-Thomas) 5/9/16 Page 4 of ? 2. Finding a balance . The CVRA was enacted to protect democratic principles of fairness and equal access to representation in government. Democratic principles also suggest that local voters should be allowed to make fundamental decisions about the methods by which their communities' local officials are elected. Sometimes, these principles conflict, as is the case when at-large elections for a local governing board are supported by a majority of a community's voters but impair a protected class of voters' ability to influence elections. AB 2389 attempts to strike a balance between making it easier for local governments to modify their elections to comply with the CVRA while still leaving some local discretion over the method by which governing boards are elected. 3. Related legislation . AB 278 (Hernandez) and AB 2220 (Cooper), which both will be heard by the Senate Governance & Finance Committee at its June 29 hearing, would allow all cities, regardless of population size, to change the method of electing council members to a by-district method of election without receiving voter approval. SB 927 (Anderson), which is pending in the Assembly Local Government Committee, permits directors of any public utility district that is wholly or partially within the County of San Diego to be elected at large or by subdistrict. The Senate Governance & Finance Committee approved SB 927 at its March 30 hearing on a 7-0 vote. 4. Double-referred . The Senate Rules Committee has ordered a double-referral of AB 2389, first to the Senate Committee on Elections & Constitutional Amendments, which has jurisdiction over bills relating to local elections and the CVRA, and then to the Senate Governance & Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over bills relating to special districts' governing boards. The Senate Elections & Constitutional Amendments Committee passed AB 2398 at its June 8, 2016 hearing on a 5-0 vote. Assembly Actions Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee: 5-2 Assembly Local Government Committee: 8-0 Assembly Floor: 59-16 AB 2389 (Ridley-Thomas) 5/9/16 Page 5 of ? Support and Opposition (6/23/16) Support : American Civil Liberties Union; Association of California Healthcare Districts; Association of California Water Agencies; California Association of Clerks and Election Officials; California Association of Recreation and Park Districts; California Special Districts Association; Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights; League of Women Voters of California; Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund. Opposition : Unknown. -- END --