BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2394 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2394 (Eduardo Garcia) As Amended March 28, 2016 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Health |19-0 |Wood, Maienschein, | | | | |Bonilla, Burke, | | | | |Campos, Chiu, | | | | |Dababneh, Gomez, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Roger Hernández, | | | | |Lackey, Nazarian, | | | | |Olsen, Patterson, | | | | |Ridley-Thomas, | | | | |Rodriguez, Santiago, | | | | |Steinorth, Thurmond, | | | | |Waldron | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bloom, Bonilla, | | | | |Bonta, Calderon, | | | | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, Eduardo | | AB 2394 Page 2 | | |Garcia, Roger | | | | |Hernández, Holden, | | | | |Jones, Obernolte, | | | | |Quirk, Santiago, | | | | |Wagner, Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Requires Medi-Cal to cover nonmedical transportation (NMT) for a beneficiary to obtain covered Medi-Cal services. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires Medi-Cal to cover NMT, subject to utilization controls and permissible time and distance standards, for a beneficiary to obtain covered Medi-Cal services. 2)States that NMT includes, at a minimum, round trip transportation for a beneficiary to obtain covered Medi-Cal services by passenger car, taxicab, or any other form of public or private conveyance, and mileage reimbursement when conveyance is in a private vehicle arranged by the beneficiary and not through a transportation broker, bus passes, taxi vouchers, or train tickets. 3)Excludes from NMT the transportation of the sick, injured, invalid, convalescent, infirm, or otherwise incapacitated beneficiaries by ambulances, litter vans, or wheelchair vans licensed, operated or equipped in accordance with state and local statutes, ordinances or regulations. 4)Requires NMT to be provided for a beneficiary who can attest in a manner to be specified by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), that other currently available resources have AB 2394 Page 3 been reasonably exhausted. Provides that for beneficiaries enrolled in a managed care plan (MCP), NMT must be provided by the MCP. Requires, for Medi-Cal fee-for-service beneficiaries, DHCS to provide NMT when those services are not available to the beneficiary. 5)Requires NMT to be provided in a form and manner that is accessible in terms of physical and geographic accessibility, for the beneficiary and consistent with applicable state and federal disability rights laws. 6)States it is the intent of the Legislature to affirm federal requirements, in which DHCS is required to provide necessary transportation, including NMT, for recipients to and from covered services. 7)Requires DHCS to seek any federal approvals that may be required to implement this bill, as specified. 8)Authorizes DHCS to implement this bill by means of an all-county letters or plan or provider FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)One-time costs, likely about $100,000 over one to two years, to develop utilization control guidelines for this new benefit (General Fund (GF)/federal funds). 2)Costs and cost pressure, potentially in the range of $1-2 million (federal funds/GF) annually combined for Medi-Cal fee-for-service (FFS) and managed care, associated with increased utilization of nonmedical transportation benefits. The majority of costs would be federal dollars, with the AB 2394 Page 4 remainder GF. Even where the benefit is already provided, standardization of time and distance standards or utilization controls, as well as a definitive statement in statute that NMT is a covered benefit, could impact utilization of the benefit. a) Costs to the managed care system associated with this bill would be experienced as cost pressure to increase rates. The majority of managed care plans already provide this benefit. b) Any costs to the FFS Medi-Cal system would be experienced as direct state costs. About half of all counties, accounting for a majority of the Medi-Cal population, already provide nonmedical transportation through the FFS system. 1)Provision of transportation when beneficiaries are otherwise unable to travel to obtain medical services could have unknown offsetting savings associated with reduced hospitalizations and better health outcomes. Some plans reportedly provide transportation on a cost-neutral basis for this reason. 2)Utilization is highly uncertain and depends on many variables, including the network robustness, whether beneficiaries and providers know it is a covered benefit, and how easy it is to access. COMMENTS: According to the author, this bill clarifies that NMT is a covered Medi-Cal benefit, aligning it with federal law and California's State Medicaid Plan and ensuring beneficiaries have needed access to health care services. Many Medi-Cal beneficiaries report difficulty accessing health care providers due to a lack of adequate transportation, especially within AB 2394 Page 5 rural communities. This transportation issue can mean delayed or skipped appointments, which inevitably exasperates many medical conditions and even results in higher costs to the state system. The author states that this bill ensures low-income beneficiaries, especially in rural areas, have access to medical care by clarifying that accessible NMT is a Medi-Cal benefit. Medi-Cal covers both emergency and nonemergency medical transportation. Emergency medical transportation is provided when necessary to obtain program covered benefits when the beneficiary's medical/physical condition is acute and severe, necessitating immediate medical diagnosis and treatment in order to prevent death or disability. Such transportation does not require prior authorization and is always by ambulance. Nonemergency medical transportation (NEMT) is provided when necessary to obtain program covered medical services and when the beneficiary's medical and physical condition is such that transport by ordinary means of private or public conveyance is medically contraindicated. This type of medical transportation is subject to prior authorization. Each authorization request for such transportation must be accompanied by either a prescription or order signed by a physician, dentist, or podiatrist, which describes the medical reasons necessitating the use of NEMT. Authorization is granted only for the lowest cost type of medical transport that is adequate for the patient's medical needs and is available to transport the patient at the time transportation is required. NMT is the transportation of members to medical services by passenger car, taxicabs, or other forms of public or private conveyances provided by persons not registered as Medi-Cal providers. NMT which represents a continuation of an original emergency transportation event is covered without prior authorization, such as transportation from an emergency room of one hospital on to a second hospital for admission or for AB 2394 Page 6 emergency services when the initial emergency room cannot provide the appropriate emergency medical treatment. According to DHCS, children and adolescents eligible for the Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment Program are eligible for NEMT and NMT. Additionally, under Cal MediConnect, also known as California's Coordinated Care Initiative, which is a three-year pilot project to promote coordinated healthcare delivery to seniors and people with disabilities who are dually eligible for both Medicare and Medi-Cal, NMT coverage is a supplemental benefit, allowing beneficiaries access to 30 one-way trips per year. In most cases, prior authorization or referrals are not required. For beneficiaries enrolled in a MCP, a managed care plan may voluntarily choose to provide NMT and MCPs must inform all members in writing the procedures for obtaining nonmedical transportation and conditions under which NMT is available. The Western Center on Law and Poverty, the sponsor of this bill, and other supporters such as Justice in Aging, Planned Parenthood Action Fund of the Pacific Southwest, and the Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations, Inc., state that access to transportation services is critical for rural residents where distances to health providers are significant, public transport is scarce, and low-income beneficiaries cannot afford the limited transportation options available. California's implementation of the transportation benefit varies widely across the state. As a result, Medi-Cal beneficiaries are either unaware that they may get assistance to go to their appointments or must fight through nearly impossible administrative hurdles to access the benefit. The County Health Executives Association of California further states that with the recent expansion of MCP into rural areas throughout California, access to NMT services has become a vital issue, particularly when it comes to specialty care services. AB 2394 Page 7 Local Health Plans of California states they are in support if amended and that this bill does not provide needed clarity that health plan rates reflect the inclusion of transportation when provided under this bill. Without this clarity, under the current managed care rate-setting process, health plans would be required to cover the service without receiving payment. The California Ambulance Association states in opposition that the Medi-Cal Program severely underpays ambulance providers and that Medi-Cal should not be expanded to include new services until the Medi-Cal program properly funds emergency ambulance services. Analysis Prepared by: Rosielyn Pulmano/ HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0003290