AB 2410, as introduced, Bonta. Early learning: Local Control School Readiness Act of 2016.
Existing law, the Child Care and Development Services Act, among other things, requires the State Department of Education to develop prekindergarten learning development guidelines in accordance with specified criteria. The act also requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to ensure that all contracts for child care and development programs include a requirement that each public or private provider maintain a developmental profile to appropriately identify the emotional, social, physical, and cognitive growth of each child in order to promote the child’s success in the public schools.
This bill would enact the Local Control School Readiness Act of 2016. The bill would require the department to develop prekindergarten learning development guidelines, focused on preparing 4- and 5-year-old children for kindergarten, based on current science that reflects how publicly funded programs can close the school readiness gap. The bill would authorize a local educational agency, as defined, in partnership with community-based organizations, to apply to the State Board of Education for a waiver from the department’s Desired Results Quality Improvement System. The bill would specify material to be submitted with such a waiver request.
The bill would require the department to submit to the state board, by July 1, 2018, a kindergarten readiness definition that has clear benchmarks for skills that are predictive of later success in academics and social-emotional, health, and executive functioning skills as evidenced by current research.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a) This act shall be known, and may be cited,
2as the Local Control School Readiness Act of 2016.
3(b) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
4(1) High-quality, early learning experiences have been shown
5to produce substantial short-term gains in children’s early language,
6literacy, mathematics, and social skills as well as long-term effects
7on a wide range of school, health, and behavioral outcomes that
8persist into adulthood, as has been demonstrated in studies
9produced by numerous scholars.
10(2) California’s investments in early learning should focus on
11gains in school
and behavioral outcomes that support low-income
12California children, English language learners, and children of
13color advancing with their peers.
14(3) One feature of high-quality early learning programs is
15alignment with the K-3rd grade education that preschoolers will
16soon enter. Preschool to 3rd grade alignment is critical in the areas
17of standards, curriculum, instructional practice, professional
18development, family engagement, and assessments.
19(4) For public K-12 education, in determining what pupils should
20learn and how they should learn it, the role of the state is to set
21standards, curriculum frameworks, and standardized assessments
22for select grade levels. Local educational agencies (LEAs) select
23curriculum, instructional materials and methods, provide
24professional development, and monitor pupil progress through
25diagnostic assessments.
26(5) For California’s early learning programs, the role of the state
27extends far beyond its role in K-12 education, and it falls short in
28one key area. In addition to early learning standards and curriculum
29frameworks, the State Department of Education develops, adopts,
30and mandates specific diagnostic assessments to be used on pupils,
P3 1specific assessments for classroom environments, specific
2professional development for instructional staff, and specific parent
3satisfaction surveys. While these are important components of a
4high-quality early learning program, LEAs and other local
5preschool providers cannot tailor these to meet the unique needs
6of their pupils nor to align with kindergarten-3rd grade. Nor do
7these compliance-focused regulations support an outcome of school
8readiness for low-income children in California. The
9state-mandated assessments and professional development are
10often done for compliance purposes only, do not improve the
11
quality of early learning programs, and are an undue administrative
12burden on LEAs and preschool providers.
13(6) Where the state falls short: California does not have a clear
14definition for what pupils need to know to be ready for
15kindergarten. Without this definition, the impact of California’s
16early learning programs on school readiness is unknown. California
17invests over $1.6 billion in state preschool and transitional
18kindergarten, and there is no information on what percentage of
19pupils start school ready for success.
20(c) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to accomplish
21both of the following:
22(1) Empower LEAs and their nonprofit partners or
23subcontractors to decide how best to prepare their preschool pupils
24for success in school and align their preschool programs with K-3rd
25grade.
26(2) Begin to shift the role of the state from a compliance-based
27early learning system to one that focuses on child outcomes. The
28first step in this process is to mandate the State Department of
29Education to conduct a study for establishing a kindergarten
30readiness definition to be considered for adoption by the State
31Board of Education by July 1, 2018.
Section 8203.3 of the Education Code is amended to
33read:
(a) begin deleteOn or before June 30, 1999, the State Department begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertThe department end insertshall develop prekindergarten
35of Education end delete
36learning development guidelines.begin delete The development of these The guidelines shall focus on preparing
37guidelines shall be funded from funds appropriated for this purpose
38in the Budget Act of 1998.end delete
39four- and five-year-old children forbegin delete kindergarten. Theend deletebegin insert
kindergarten,
P4 1based on current science that reflects how publicly funded
2programs can close the school readiness gap.end insert
3begin insert (2)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTheend insert guidelinesbegin insert developed under this sectionend insert shall identify
4appropriate developmental milestones for each age, how to assess
5where children are in relation to the milestones, and suggested
6methods for achieving the milestones. In addition, the guidelines
7shall identify any basic beginning skills needed to prepare children
8for kindergarten or first grade, and methods for teaching these
9basic skills. The guidelines shall be articulated with the academic
10content and performance standards adopted by thebegin delete State Board of begin insert
state boardend insert for kindergarten and grades 1 to 12,
11Educationend delete
12inclusive. Thebegin delete State Department of Educationend deletebegin insert departmentend insert may
13contract with an appropriate public or private agency to develop
14the guidelines.
15(b) In future expenditure plans for quality improvement
16activities, thebegin delete State Department of Educationend deletebegin insert departmentend insert shall
17include funding for periodically updating the guidelines consistent
18with academic and performance standards and relevant research,
19broadly distributing the guidelines, and providing education,
20outreach, and training services to implement
the guidelines.
21(c) Programs funded by thebegin delete State Department of Educationend delete
22begin insert departmentend insert under Article 6 (commencing with Section 8230),
23Article 7 (commencing with Section 8235), and Article 8
24(commencing with Section 8240) shall use the prekindergarten
25learning development guidelines developed pursuant to this section.
Section 8203.6 is added to the Education Code, to
27read:
(a) A local educational agency, including a school
29district, charter school, and county office of education, in
30partnership with community-based organizations, may apply to
31the state board for a waiver from the department’s Desired Results
32Quality Improvement System, which includes the developmental
33profile. A Local Control Quality Improvement Plan shall be
34submitted with the waiver request, and shall include all of the
35following:
36(1) At least one diagnostic assessment tool that is used no less
37than three times a year to monitor children’s developmental
38progress. This assessment shall be valid, reliable, including
39inter-rater reliability, and linguistically, culturally and
P5 1developmentally appropriate, and include a benchmark for
2kindergarten
readiness.
3(2) A regular process for reviewing the assessment data with
4teachers and adult caregivers.
5(3) A plan for providing coaching and professional development
6to support teachers to meet pupil needs.
7(4) A plan for parent engagement and support that includes at
8least two parent conferences each year to review children’s
9developmental progress and school-home linkages to support
10learning, and an annual parent satisfaction survey.
11(b) Once a waiver is approved under subdivision (a), the local
12educational agency shall submit an annual continuous quality
13improvement plan to the department.
14(c) To enable waiver applicants to continue to participate in the
15Quality Rating and Improvement
System (QRIS), they may
16substitute the developmental profile with their own kindergarten
17readiness outcomes or diagnostic assessment tool.
Section 8203.7 is added to the Education Code, to
19read:
By July 1, 2018, the department shall submit to the
21state board a kindergarten readiness definition that has clear
22benchmarks for skills that are predictive of later success in
23academics and social-emotional, health, and executive functioning
24skills as evidenced by current research. The department may
25contract with an appropriate public or private agency.
O
99