AB 2410, as amended, Bonta. Early learning: Local Control School Readiness Act of 2016.
Existing law, the Child Care and Development Services Act, among other things, requires the State Department of Education to develop prekindergarten learning development guidelines in accordance with specified criteria. The act also requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to ensure that all contracts for child care and development programs include a requirement that each public or private provider maintain a developmental profile to appropriately identify the emotional, social, physical, and cognitive growth of each child in order to promote the child’s success in the public schools.
This bill would enact the Local Control School Readiness Act of 2016. The bill would require the department to develop prekindergarten learning development guidelines, focused on preparing 4- and 5-year-old children for kindergarten, based on current science that reflects how publicly funded programs can close the school readiness gap. The bill would authorize a local educational agency, as defined, in partnership with community-based organizations, to apply to the State Board of Education for a waiver from the department’s Desired Results Quality Improvement System. The bill would specify material to be submitted with such a waiver request.
The bill would require thebegin delete department toend deletebegin insert California Committee for Kindergarten Readiness, created by this bill, to convene on or before March 1, 2017, and toend insert submit to the state board,begin delete by July 1, 2018,end deletebegin insert
on or before January 1, 2018,end insert a kindergarten readiness definition that has clear benchmarks for skills that are predictive of later success in academics andbegin delete social-emotional, health,end deletebegin insert social-emotionalend insert and executive functioning skills as evidenced by current research.begin insert The bill would specify the membership of the committee and would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2019.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a) This act shall be known, and may be cited,
2as the Local Control School Readiness Act of 2016.
3(b) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
4(1) High-quality, early learning experiences have been shown
5to produce substantial short-term gains in children’s early language,
6literacy, mathematics, and social skills as well as long-term effects
7on a wide range of school, health, and behavioral outcomes that
8persist into adulthood, as has been demonstrated in studies
9produced by numerous scholars.
10(2) California’s investments in early learning should focus on
11gains in school
and behavioral outcomes that support low-income
12California children, Englishbegin delete languageend delete learners, and children of
13color advancing with their peers.
14(3) One feature of high-quality early learning programs is
15alignment with the K-3rd grade education that preschoolers will
16soon enter. Preschool to 3rd grade alignment is critical in the areas
17of standards, curriculum, instructional practice, professional
18development, family engagement, and assessments.
19(4) For public K-12 education, in determining what pupils
20should learn and how they should learn it, the role of the state is
21to set standards, curriculum frameworks, and standardized
22assessments for select grade levels. Local educational agencies
23(LEAs) select curriculum, instructional materials and methods,
P3 1provide professional development, and monitor
pupil progress
2throughbegin delete diagnosticend deletebegin insert formativeend insert assessments.
3(5) For California’s early learning programs, the role of the state
4extends far beyond its role in K-12 education, and it falls short in
5one key area. In addition to early learning standards and curriculum
6frameworks, the State Department of Education develops, adopts,
7and mandates specificbegin delete diagnosticend deletebegin insert
formativeend insert assessments to be used
8on pupils, specific assessments for classroom environments,
9specific professional development for instructional staff, and
10specific parent satisfaction surveys. While these are important
11components of a high-quality early learning program, LEAs and
12other local preschool providers cannot tailor these to meet the
13unique needs of their pupils nor to align withbegin delete kindergarten-3rd begin insert K-end insertbegin insert3rd grade education.end insert Nor do these compliance-focused
14grade.end delete
15regulations support an outcome of school readiness for low-income
16children in California. The state-mandated assessments and
17professional development are often done for compliance purposes
18only, do not improve the
quality of early learning programs, and
19are an undue administrative burden on LEAs and preschool
20providers.
21(6) Where the state falls short: California does not have a clear
22definition for what pupils need to know to be ready for
23kindergarten. Without this definition, the impact of California’s
24early learning programs on school readiness is unknown. California
25invests over $1.6 billion in state preschool and transitional
26kindergarten, and there is no information on what percentage of
27pupils start school ready for success.
28(c) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to accomplish
29both of the following:
30(1) Empower LEAs and their nonprofit partners or
31subcontractors to decide how best to prepare their preschool pupils
32for success in school and align their preschool programs with
33K-3rdbegin delete grade.end deletebegin insert
grade education.end insert
34(2) Begin to shift the role of the state from a compliance-based
35early learning system to one that focuses on child outcomes. The
36first step in this process is to mandate the State Department of
37Education to conduct a study for establishing a kindergarten
38readiness definition to be considered for adoption by the State
39Board of Education by July 1, 2018.
Section 8203.3 of the Education Code is amended to
2read:
(a) (1) The department shall develop prekindergarten
4learning development guidelines. The guidelines shall focus on
5preparing four- and five-year-old children for kindergarten, based
6on current science that reflects how publicly funded programs can
7close the school readiness gap.
8 (2) The guidelines developed under this section shall identify
9appropriate developmental milestones for each age, how to assess
10where children are in relation to the milestones, and suggested
11methods for achieving the milestones. In addition, the guidelines
12shall identify any basic beginning skills needed to prepare children
13for kindergarten or first grade, and methods for teaching these
14basic skills. The guidelines shall be
articulated with the academic
15content and performance standards adopted by the state board for
16kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive. The department may
17contract with an appropriate public or private agency to develop
18the guidelines.
19(b) In future expenditure plans for quality improvement
20activities, the department shall include funding for periodically
21updating the guidelines consistent with academic and performance
22standards and relevant research, broadly distributing the guidelines,
23and providing education, outreach, and training services to
24implement the guidelines.
25(c) Programs funded by the department under Article 6
26(commencing with Section 8230), Article 7 (commencing with
27Section 8235), and Article 8 (commencing with Section 8240)
28shall use the prekindergarten learning development guidelines
29developed pursuant to this section.
Section 8203.6 is added to the Education Code, to
31read:
(a) A local educational agency, including a school
33district, charter school, and county office of education, in
34partnership with community-based organizations, may apply to
35the state board for a waiver from the department’s Desired Results
36Quality Improvement System, which includes the developmental
37profile. A Local Control Quality Improvement Plan shall be
38submitted with the waiver request, and shall include all of the
39following:
P5 1(1) At least onebegin delete diagnosticend deletebegin insert formativeend insert assessment tool that is
2used no less than three times a year to monitor children’s
3
developmental progress. This assessment shall be valid, reliable,
4including inter-rater reliability, and linguistically,begin delete culturallyend delete
5begin insert culturally,end insert and developmentally appropriate, and include a
6benchmark for kindergarten readiness.
7(2) A regular process for reviewing the assessment data with
8teachers and adult caregivers.
9(3) A plan for providing coaching and professional development
10to support teachers to meet pupil needs.
11(4) A plan for parent engagement and support that includes at
12least two parent conferences each year to review children’s
13developmental progress and school-home linkages to support
14learning, and an annual parent
satisfaction survey.
15(b) Once a waiver is approved under subdivision (a), the local
16educational agency shall submit an annual continuous quality
17improvement plan to thebegin delete department.end deletebegin insert department, and shall
18participate in a stakeholder group to share data and findings with
19the state.end insert
20(c) To enable waiver applicants to continue to participate in the
21Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS), they may
22substitute the developmental profile with their own kindergarten
23readiness outcomes orbegin delete diagnosticend deletebegin insert
formativeend insert assessment tool.
Section 8203.7 is added to the Education Code, to
25read:
begin deleteBy July 1, 2018, the department end deletebegin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertOn or before
27March 1, 2017, the California Committee for Kindergarten
28Readiness, hereby created, shall convene. On or before January
291, 2018, the committee end insertshall submit to the state board a
30kindergarten readiness definition that has clear benchmarks for
31skills that are predictive of later success in academics and
32begin delete social-emotional, health,end deletebegin insert social-emotionalend insert and executive
33functioning skills as
evidenced by current research. Thebegin delete departmentend delete
34begin insert committeeend insert may contract with an appropriate public or private
35
begin delete agency.end deletebegin insert agency for purposes of developing a kindergarten
36readiness definition.end insert
37
(b) The California Committee for Kindergarten Readiness shall
38be composed of the following 10 members:
39
(1) The president of the
state board, or his or her designee.
P6 1
(2) The chair of the California Children and Families
2Commission, or his or her designee.
3
(3) The Superintendent, or his or her designee.
4
(4) The chair of the State Advisory Council on Early Learning
5and Care, or his or her designee.
6
(5) An expert on early childhood brain development,
appointed
7by the Speaker of the Assembly.
8
(6) An expert on kindergarten readiness standards, appointed
9by the Speaker of the Assembly.
10
(7) A preschool or kindergarten teacher, appointed by the
11Speaker of the Assembly.
12
(8) An expert on dual language learners, appointed by the
13President pro Tempore of the Senate.
14
(9) An expert on
family engagement and support, appointed by
15the President pro Tempore of the Senate.
16
(10) A preschool or kindergarten teacher, appointed by the
17President pro Tempore of the Senate.
18
(c) The members specified in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive,
19of subdivision (b) shall be cochairs of the committee.
20
(d) This section is repealed on January 1, 2019.
O
98