BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2436


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2436 (Roger Hernández)


          As Amended  April 27, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Health          |11-5 |Wood, Bonilla, Burke, |Maienschein,        |
          |                |     |Campos, Dababneh,     |Lackey, Olsen,      |
          |                |     |Gomez,                |Patterson,          |
          |                |     |                      |Steinorth           |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Roger Hernández,      |                    |
          |                |     |Nazarian,             |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Ridley-Thomas,        |                    |
          |                |     |Rodriguez, Santiago   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |14-6 |Gonzalez, Bloom,      |Bigelow, Patterson, |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Bonta,       |Gallagher, Jones,   |
          |                |     |Calderon, Daly,       |Obernolte, Wagner   |
          |                |     |Eggman, Eduardo       |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |








                                                                    AB 2436


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Requires a health care service plan (health plan)  
          contract or health insurance policy issued, amended, or renewed  
          on or after January 1, 2017, that provides coverage for  
          prescription drug benefits to notify the enrollee or insured of  
          the following at the time of delivery of a prescription drug or  
          within 30 days of purchase:


          1)The enrollee's share of the cost for the prescription drug,  
            including any copayment, coinsurance, or other cost sharing,  
            and the accumulation of that cost sharing to the enrollee's  
            deductible, if any, or out-of-pocket maximum; and,


          2)The publicly available, nonproprietary wholesale acquisition  
            cost of a prescription drug.


          This bill also requires the Department of Managed Health Care  
          (DMHC) to adopt regulations regarding the manner in which health  
          plans will implement these requirements by January 1, 2018.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  This bill will result in regulatory costs to  
          both DMHC and the California Department of Insurance (CDI), to  
          implement and establish a standardized process and notice  
          requirements. 


          1)Costs to CDI of $40,000-$50,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17  
            and $40,000-$50,000 in FY 2017-18.










                                                                    AB 2436


                                                                    Page  3





          2)Costs to the DMHC's Office of Legal Services (OLS) of around  
            $65,000 in FY 2016-17, $68,000 in FY 2017-18, and $65,000 in  
            FY 2018-19. 


          COMMENTS:  The author states that this bill takes an important  
          step, by requiring transparency on prescription drug pricing for  
          consumers.  The high price of some prescription drugs has raised  
          questions about their affordability, whether their cost is worth  
          the clinical benefits they provide, and the financial model of  
          the current healthcare system.  The rising costs of prescription  
          drugs are placing an increasing burden on payers, employers, and  
          patients.  Notably, new Hepatitis C virus treatment options that  
          cure the underlying disease with remarkable efficiency offer a  
          drastic improvement over previous therapies.  Payment systems  
          have been significantly impacted by the cost of these drugs  
          since their arrival on the market, but many argue that patients  
          and payers will benefit in the long run by the avoided  
          downstream costs to cancer treatment and liver transplants.   
          Other high priced drugs offer striking therapeutic advances for  
          a range of very serious conditions, including cancer, rheumatoid  
          arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and many others.  Policymakers  
          are faced with balancing the need to reward pharmaceutical  
          breakthroughs in order to ensure the innovation of future cures  
          with the fact that payers and patients have limited resources to  
          afford very high prices.


          Health Access California, the sponsor of this bill, states that  
          this bill would inform consumers about the costs of their  
          prescription medications, including consumer cost sharing and  
          cost of the drug to the health plan or health insurer.  Asian  
          Law Alliance (ALA) states that the soaring cost of prescription  
          drugs ranks at the top of the problems consumers have with the  
          health care system and United States prescription drug costs are  
          far higher than in Europe or nearby countries like Canada and  
          Mexico.  ALA also contends that prescription drugs are the  
          health service most commonly used by consumers.  Doctors for  
          America states that consumers deserve to know how much their  








                                                                    AB 2436


                                                                    Page  4





          medication will cost them, how much their insurance will pay,  
          and be able to compare this price to the price for the same drug  
          in other countries.  The California School Employees  
          Association, AFL-CIO, states that this bill will unveil some of  
          the secrecy in prescription drug costs and maybe through  
          disclosure of this data we can rein in, or at least understand,  
          the costs of prescription drugs.  


          Kaiser Permanente states that this bill will not encourage the  
          lowering of drug prices and instead will increase costs for  
          businesses and consumers.  The Association of California Life  
          and Health Insurance Companies states that this bill only  
          provides the final cost of purchase between seller and buyer  
          without addressing the underlying, and still mysterious, costs  
          used by the seller to determine the sales price.  


          Blue Shield of California (BSC) states that this bill imposes  
          duplicative requirements on health plans to disclose information  
          to members since the standardized benefit design and the retail  
          prescription drug price cap provide consumers with useful  
          information about their cost sharing responsibility, rendering  
          most of the requirement of this bill useless.  BSC also states  
          that the accumulation of cost sharing is an unworkable  
          requirement as health plans do not always know in real-time when  
          services have been rendered and what an enrollee has paid toward  
          their share of cost and that this requirement would be both  
          costly and impossible to implement at a time when plans are  
          being pressured to keep administrative costs low.  Finally, BSC  
          contends that the onus should be placed on drug manufacturers to  
          provide pricing information to consumers and more importantly,  
          to be part of the quest for sustainably affordable healthcare  
          for all consumers. 


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Kristene Mapile / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097  FN:  
          0003011








                                                                    AB 2436


                                                                    Page  5