BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2476 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 11, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 2476 (Daly) - As Introduced February 19, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Local Government |Vote:|5 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: Yes SUMMARY: This bill requires a local agency, within one week following a legislative body's vote to place a proposed parcel tax on the ballot, to provide specified notice to all property owners AB 2476 Page 2 affected by the tax. Specifically, this bill: 1)Defines "local agency" to mean a city, county, special district, or school district authorized to impose a parcel tax. 2)Requires the notice to include the amount or rate of the proposed parcel tax, the method and frequency for collecting the proposed parcel tax, the duration of time the parcel tax will be imposed, the date that the proposed parcel tax will be voted on, and the telephone number and address that interested persons may contact to receive additional information about the proposed parcel tax. 3)Requires the notice to be mailed, for all properties proposed to be subject to the new parcel tax, to those persons whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized county assessment roll or the State Board of Equalization assessment roll. 4)Authorizes the local agency to recover the reasonable costs of the notice from the proceeds of the parcel tax, but prohibits the recovered costs from exceeding the reasonable costs of preparing and mailing the notice. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)If the parcel tax is not approved by the voters, potentially reimbursable mandate costs, potentially in the hundreds of thousands to low millions of dollars (GF) annually, for preparing and mailing the notices. 2)If the measure is approved, the bill allows a local agency to AB 2476 Page 3 recover reasonable costs of the notice requirement from the proceeds of the parcel tax. Note: Local costs will vary by jurisdiction depending on the number of property owners affected. Assuming $1 per-property owner cost of printing, postage and staff time, a jurisdiction with 50,000 property owners would incur $50,000 in costs for the notification per ballot measure. Between 2002 and November 2013, 45% of the 396 measures placed on the ballot were approved (178 passed, 218 failed). COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, "Currently, property owners are required to pay parcel taxes approved by the voters of a local jurisdiction. If a property owner is a resident of the local jurisdiction that is seeking to enact a parcel tax, that property owner will receive a voter pamphlet prior to the election. Non-resident property owners - who own a parcel or parcels within a local jurisdiction but reside elsewhere - receive no notice of a pending parcel tax vote. AB 2476 seeks to provide a measure of fairness by establishing a process for notifying the non-resident property owners. This bill seeks to ensure that all property owners are notified of a pending parcel tax vote, whether or not they are entitled to vote on the measure. 2)Background. A parcel tax is a particular type of special tax that is based on either a flat per-parcel rate or a rate that varies depending upon use, size, and/or number of units on each parcel. The California Constitution allows cities, AB 2476 Page 4 counties, and special districts to impose special taxes by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors in that jurisdiction. To place a parcel tax measure on the ballot, a local agency must adopt a resolution stating the type of tax and rate to be levied, the method of collection, and the date of the election. In addition, local agencies must issue a statement indicating the specific purpose of the tax, create an account in which to deposit proceeds, and issue an annual report that includes the amount of funds collected and expended, and the project status of any project required or authorized by the tax measure. A parcel tax measure levied by a local agency requires approval by two-thirds of the "qualified electors." The Court has interpreted the phrase "qualified electors of such district" to mean the "registered voters" voting in the election concerning the proposed tax. Non-resident property owners who are not registered voters within the district's boundaries do not vote on the proposed parcel tax. Voters who do not own real property, but are registered within the district's boundaries, like renters or tenants, are able to vote on a parcel tax. However, they are not included in the notification requirement proposed by this bill. 3)Prior Legislation. a) AB 237 (Daly) of 2015, was nearly identical to this bill. This bill was held on this Committee's Suspense File. b) AB 2109 (Daly), Chapter 781, Statutes of 2014, required the State Controller to report annually on the imposition AB 2476 Page 5 of each locally assessed parcel tax, and required each county, city, and special district to provide any information required by the Controller in order to complete the report. c) AB 892 (Daly) of 2013, would have required the Board of Equalization to report annually to the Governor on the imposition of each locally assessed parcel tax. This bill was held on this Committee's Suspense File. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081