BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2480 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2480 (Bloom) As Amended May 31, 2016 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Water |9-6 |Levine, Dodd, Eggman, |Gallagher, Bigelow, | | | |Cristina Garcia, |Harper, Mathis, | | | | |Olsen, Salas | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Gomez, Lopez, Medina, | | | | |Williams | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |14-6 |Gonzalez, Bloom, |Bigelow, Chang, | | | |Bonilla, Bonta, |Gallagher, Jones, | | | |Calderon, Daly, |Obernolte, Wagner | | | |Eggman, Eduardo | | | | |Garcia, Roger | | | | |Hernández, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Santiago, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ AB 2480 Page 2 SUMMARY: Declares a state policy that source watersheds are recognized and defined as integral components of California's water system, and that, to the extent feasible, the maintenance and repair of source watersheds and associated projects shall receive financing consideration on the same basis as other water collection and treatment infrastructure. Specifically, this bill: 1)Declares it to be established policy of the state that source watersheds are recognized and defined as an integral component of California's water system, and that, to the extent feasible, the maintenance and repair of source watersheds and associated projects shall receive financing consideration on the same basis as other water collection and treatment infrastructure. 2)Limits eligible maintenance and repair activities to the following forest ecosystem management activities: a) Upland vegetation management to restore watershed productivity and resilience. b) Wet and dry meadow restoration. c) Road removal and repair. d) Stream channel restoration. e) Conservation of private forests to preserve watershed integrity through permanent prevention of conversion and degradation, achieved through conservation easements. f) Other projects with a demonstrated likelihood of AB 2480 Page 3 increasing conditions for water and snow attraction, retention, and release under changing climate conditions. EXISTING LAW: 1)Authorizes Department of Water Resources (DWR) to operate and maintain the State Water Project (SWP) that provides water supplies for urban and some agricultural uses in the state. Funds from the sale of general obligation and revenue bonds have provided about 78% of the financing for construction of the SWP, repayment of which is made by the SWP beneficiaries. The contractors repay water supply related costs of the SWP that include about 94% of the annual costs for operation and maintenance of the SWP facilities. Authorizes the issuance of bonds and loans to finance expenditures of the SWP, and authorizes the DWR to enter into contracts and establish prices, rates, and charges to produce the revenues needed to pay for the costs of operation and maintenance of the SWP. 2)Authorizes the Central Valley Project (CVP), a federal water project operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation that provides water primarily for agricultural purposes but also supplies water for some urban uses in the state. 3)Authorizes the DWR to use revenue bonds or other funds available for the purposes of the SWP to finance, in whole or in part, water conservation programs and facilities that reduce demands by the sponsoring contractor for project water from the system and increase the supply of project water available in the Delta for distribution. AB 2480 Page 4 4)Includes a state policy that the Legislature consider other works as may be necessary to develop water to satisfy the requirements of the watershed in which water originates whenever the Legislature authorizes the construction or acquisition of a project that will develop water for use outside that watershed. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis: 1)Potential cost pressures in the hundreds of millions of dollars or more to finance watershed maintenance and repair. Based on watershed restoration projects in Denver and New York, the DWR estimates a per acre restoration cost of between $430 to $1,500. The Klamath-Cascade Range spans more than 10 million acres. If restoration costs are similar to projects in Denver and New York, costs may be somewhere in the $4.3 to $10 billion range, which the State Water Project would likely be able to pass on to its ratepayers (General Fund or special fund). 2)Unknown increased ongoing State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) costs to provide guidance and oversight on watershed funding applications. COMMENTS: This bill establishes a state policy that source watersheds are recognized as essential components of the state's water systems and that their maintenance and repair may be AB 2480 Page 5 financed similarly to the ways in which other water collection and treatment infrastructure is financed. The author of this bill emphasizes that California's complex water system, which includes the built infrastructure of dams, reservoirs, canals, pumps and pipes that deliver water throughout the state, rely on a suite of financing options that provide the funding for necessary infrastructure costs. However, these projects rely on more than the built infrastructure to function. They also rely on the five watersheds above the dams to collect, treat and deliver that water to the dams. These watersheds include the Feather, Pit, McCloud, Upper Sacramento and Trinity River watersheds. While there is recognition that watersheds serve these functions, there is no policy or system of support for this natural infrastructure which is integral to, and supplies and complements, the built infrastructure. The author asserts these watersheds are essential to ensuring the future of a well-functioning water system. There is also scientific recognition that watershed condition affects the quality and quantity of water delivered by watersheds to dams. Enhancing the conditions of the watersheds would increase water quality by reducing sediment and lowering temperatures, and can also increase water quantity by as much as 5% to 20% depending on conditions. The goal of this bill is to recognize the fundamental role of source watersheds, and set the foundation for a comprehensive plan of restoration and conservation, with the potential of future financing such as revenue bonds and other financing mechanisms, similar to those available for the built infrastructure. Supporters assert that watersheds are an essential part of the state's water systems, constituting the natural infrastructure that collects, treats, and transports water to reservoirs. Supporters emphasize that watersheds in California are in AB 2480 Page 6 sub-optimal condition, threatening water security. They assert this is especially true with the increased stresses of on-going drought and climate change. Watershed restoration and conservation will help prevent degradation, maintain and enhance water reliability, improve water quality, and, in some cases, increase the quantity of water flowing into the state's reservoirs. Healthier watersheds can also help regulate the timing of flows into reservoirs, extending flows later into the year. Opponents to this bill, unless amended, expressed opposition to the insertion of the SWRCB into a role in the development of watershed financing investment plans. The amendments to this bill taken in the Assembly Appropriations Committee deleted that provision. Opponents also indicated that while they support some forms of watershed funding, such as the General Fund or general obligation bonds, they would oppose others, such as a public goods charge or statewide water tax, whether such methods were used to fund watersheds or other priorities. Analysis Prepared by: Diane Colborn / W., P., & W. / (916) 319-2096 FN: 0003312