AB 2489, as amended, McCarty. Pupil rights: restorative justice practices.
Existing law requires suspension to be imposed on a pupil only when other means of correction fail to bring about proper conduct, and specifies that other means of correction may include, among other things, participation in a restorative justice program.
This bill would require the State Department of Education tobegin delete develop a standard model to implement restorative justice practices on a school campus and to make the standard model available on the department’s Internet Web site for use by any school district that chooses to implement restorative justice practices as part of its campus culture. The bill would require the department to take specified actions to implement the bill’s provisions, including
consultingend deletebegin insert consultend insert with school-based restorative justice practitioners and others to identify bestbegin delete practices, as specified.end deletebegin insert practices to evaluate the implementation of restorative justice practices in school districts, to develop standard models or recommendations for effective implementation, and to post the standard model or models or recommendations on the department’s Internet Web site.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Article 9 (commencing with Section 49055) is
2added to Chapter 6 of Part 27 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the 3Education Code, to read:
4
(a) The department shall develop a standard model to
8implement restorative justice practices on a school campus and
9shall make the standard model available on the department’s
10Internet Web site for use by any school district that chooses to
11implement
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertIt is the intent of the Legislature to evaluate existing end insert
13restorative justice practicesbegin delete as part of its campus culture.end delete
14
begin insert implemented by school districts to determine if there are common
15effective strategies that can be shared with school districts that
16have not implemented restorative justice practices.end insert
17(b) The department shall do
all of thebegin delete following to implement begin insert
following:end insert
18this section:end delete
19(1) Consult with school-based restorative justice practitioners,
20educators, pupils, community stakeholders, and nonprofit and
21public entities to identify best practices for effective,
22evidence-based restorative justice in elementary and secondary
23schools.
24(2) Select an advisory committee made up of stakeholders and
25professionals who have participated in the development and
26expansion of restorative justice programs to assist in the planning
27and implementation of the standard model.
28(3) Collect and disseminate evidence-based best practices.
end delete
29
(2) Evaluate the implementation of restorative justice practices
30in school districts and, upon consultation with the stakeholders
31pursuant to paragraph (1), either develop standard models or
32develop recommendations for effective implementation.
P3 1
(3) Post the standard model or models or recommendations
2developed pursuant to paragraph (2) on the department’s Internet
3Web site.
O
97