BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Senator Tony Mendoza, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 2503 Hearing Date: June 8, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Obernolte | |-----------+-----------------------------------------------------| |Version: |April 19, 2016 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |No | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Gideon Baum | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Workers' compensation: utilization review KEY ISSUE Should the Legislature require that all physician requests for medical treatment authorization (RFAs) be sent directly to the claims administrator for the employer or insurer? ANALYSIS Existing law: 1) Establishes a workers' compensation system that provides benefits to an employee who suffers from an injury or illness that arises out of and in the course of employment, irrespective of fault. This system requires all employers to secure payment of benefits by either securing the consent of the Department of Industrial Relations to self-insure or by securing insurance against liability from an insurance company duly authorized by the state. 2) Provides that medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, and hospital treatment, including nursing, medicines, medical and surgical supplies, crutches, and AB 2503 (Obernolte) Page 2 of ? apparatuses, including orthotic and prosthetic devices and services, that is reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury shall be provided by the employer. (Labor Code §4600) 3) Requires that all employers create a utilization review process, which is a process that prospectively, retrospectively, or concurrently review and approve, modify, delay, or deny, based in whole or in part on medical necessity to cure and relieve, treatment recommendations by physicians, prior to, retrospectively, or concurrent with the provision of medical treatment services. (Labor Code §4610) 4) Requires that each utilization review (UR) process shall be governed by written policies and that these policies and procedures, and a description of the utilization process, must be filed with the administrative director and shall be disclosed by the employer to employees, physicians, and the public upon request. (Labor Code §4610(c)) This bill would require that all physician RFAs be sent directly to the claims administrator for the employer or insurer. COMMENTS 1. Need for this bill? According to the author and sponsor, the silence in existing law on where a physician should send a RFA is creating difficulty for healthcare providers and is creating delays in the provision of medical treatment. Specifically, AB 2503 would require that a RFA is submitted directly to a claims administrator, rather than a UR vendor or some other third party. In doing so, AB 2503 will make precisely clear where a RFA should be submitted so that a request for medical treatment can be timely assessed, avoiding unnecessary delays. 2. Proponent Arguments : The sponsor of this bill, the California Orthopaedic Association (COA), argues that existing law's silence on where a physician should submit a request for authorization of medical treatment has the potential to create great mischief. AB 2503 (Obernolte) Page 3 of ? Specifically, COA notes that different employers/insurers have different policies for where a RFA should be submitted, which can lead to confusion for physicians. COA argues that, by specifically stating where a RFA must be submitted, AB 2503 will minimize confusion and delays, leading to better medical treatment for injured workers. 3. Opponent Arguments : None on file. 4. Prior Legislation : SB 228 (Alarcon), Chapter 639, Statutes of 2003, required employers to implement a utilization review process. SUPPORT California Orthopaedic Association (Sponsor) Police Officers Research Association of California OPPOSITION -- END --