BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2543


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 18, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          2543 (Gordon) - As Introduced February 19, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Natural Resources              |Vote:|9 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Accountability and             |     |8 - 0        |
          |             |Administrative Review          |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill assigns primary responsibility for developing a  
          multi-year energy efficiency plan for state facilities to the  
          California Energy Commission (CEC), instead of the Department of  
          General Services (DGS), and expands the scope of the plan to  
          include water conservation.  Specifically, this bill: 










                                                                    AB 2543


                                                                    Page  2





          1)Revises the existing requirement to develop a multi-year  
            energy efficiency plan to give the CEC lead responsibility,  
            instead of DGS, and requires the CEC to solicit input from  
            both public and private entities when developing the plan.

          2)Adds water conservation measures to the scope of the plan.

          3)Specifies that the plan may not prohibit, limit, or supersede  
            more stringent green building requirements for public  
            buildings.

          4)Excludes state-leased buildings from the plan, except those  
            financed through lease-revenue bonds.

          5)Requires DGS to consult with the CEC when making  
            recommendations to improve energy and water efficiency in  
            state facilities and submit a related report to the Governor  
            and Legislature by January 1, 2018.



          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)Increased ongoing costs of $500,000 in contracts and an  
            estimated $200,000 to $350,000 for three positions at the CEC  
            (unknown funding source).
            The CEC estimates three new technical staff  would be required  
            to:  1) prepare the multi-year plans; 2) solicit for and  
            manage contract resources; 3) participate in state building  
            audits;  4) identify and evaluate potential energy and water  
            conservation measures; 5) collaborate with all affected state  
            agencies; 6) organize and facilitate public workshops; and  
            7)track multi-year plan implementations.   Contract resources  
            will be needed to fund state building audits as well as  
            identification and evaluation of potential energy and water  
            conservation measures. 










                                                                    AB 2543


                                                                    Page  3








            These new responsibilities are not able to be absorbed by  
            current resources.  The CEC basic funding source is ERPA  
            (Energy Program Resource Account) but it is currently in  
            deficit, so some other fund would need to be identified to pay  
            for this bill (GF or other special fund).





          2)Minimal fiscal impact on DGS, and potential cost savings.   
            Although the bill shifts responsibility of the report to CEC,  
            DGS is still required to make recommendations and report  
            information on energy efficiency measures.
          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  Currently, DGS is the state's lead agency in the  
            greening of government.  Among other green responsibilities,  
            it develops the statutorily-required multi-year energy  
            efficiency plan for state buildings and provides a biennial  
            report to the Governor and Legislature that contains specific  
            information on energy efficiency projects in its jurisdiction.  
             This bill would instead shift primary responsibility for the  
            plan to the CEC and include water conservation measures in the  
            scope of the plan.


            According to the author, this bill seeks to create a stronger  
            investigative partnership between the CEC and DGS in order to  
            identify potential measures for greater energy and water  
            efficiency in state buildings. This bill gives the CEC a  
            greater role in ensuring that the state is doing as much as  
            possible to reduce energy and water consumption.










                                                                    AB 2543


                                                                    Page  4





          2)Background.  Since at least 1991, state law has required new  
            and renovated state buildings to meet prevailing energy  
            efficiency standards and to consider additional measures when  
            cost-effective and feasible.  Over the same period, DGS has  
            been required to continually update an energy efficiency plan  
            for state facilities.  However, because their capital budgets  
            are disconnected from their utility budgets, state agencies  
            often have lacked the incentive and the funds to fully exploit  
            cost-effective energy efficiency opportunities in building  
            design and materials.

          DGS' most recent report, Biennial Report for Energy Efficiency  
            in Public Buildings, was submitted to the Legislature July 25,  
            2013.  The report includes progress made on greenhouse gas  
            (GHG) emissions reductions, energy efficiency, reducing  
            grid-based energy purchases, demand response programs, on-site  
            renewable energy goals, building design and construction,  
            existing buildings, building commissioning, indoor  
            environmental quality, water efficiency and conservation,  
            electric vehicle charging, and environmentally preferable  
            purchasing.  
            
            According to the report, "the greatest obstacle to  
            implementing energy efficiency measures is lack of funding.   
            The prolonged economic downturn has greatly impacted the  
            availability of General Fund allocations to projects that are  
            critical to the function of state programs." 











          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  








                                                                    AB 2543


                                                                    Page  5





          319-2081