BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2555


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2555 (Committee on Water, et al.)


          As Introduced  February 19, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Water           |13-1 |Levine, Gallagher,    |Mathis              |
          |                |     |Bigelow, Dababneh,    |                    |
          |                |     |Dodd, Gordon,         |                    |
          |                |     |Cristina Garcia,      |                    |
          |                |     |Gomez, Lopez, Medina, |                    |
          |                |     |Olsen, Salas,         |                    |
          |                |     |Williams              |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |16-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Roger      |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Obernolte, |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Wood          |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 








                                                                    AB 2555


                                                                    Page  2







          SUMMARY:  Extends the operative date on several Fish and Game  
          Code sections that will otherwise sunset at the end of this year  
          unless extended, including provisions related to invasive quagga  
          and zebra mussel programs, coho salmon recovery, and procedural  
          provisions of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).   
          Specifically, this bill:


          1)Extends provisions of existing law authorizing the Department  
            of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) to develop and implement a recovery  
            strategy pilot program for coho salmon for three years to  
            January 1, 2020.  These provisions will otherwise remain in  
            effect only until January 1, 2017, and as of that date will be  
            repealed unless extended.


          2)Extends provisions of existing law authorizing the DFW to  
            conduct inspections and take other actions necessary to  
            prevent the spread of invasive dreissenid mussels in waters of  
            the state, and related provisions, for three years to January  
            1, 2020.  These provisions will otherwise remain in effect  
            only until January 1, 2017, and as of that date will be  
            repealed unless extended.


          3)Repeals the sunset date on certain procedural provisions of  
            CESA enacted in 2013, thereby allowing those provisions to  
            continue in effect.   


          EXISTING LAW:


          1)Prohibits the possession, importation, transportation,  
            transfer or release of dreissenid mussels in California, and  
            authorizes the DFW to conduct inspections and take other  
            related actions to prevent the spread of the invasive mussels.  








                                                                    AB 2555


                                                                    Page  3





             These provisions sunset on January 1, 2017, unless extended.


          2)Authorizes the DFW to develop and implement a coho salmon  
            recovery strategy pilot program, and specifies the contents of  
            the strategy.  These provisions sunset on January 1, 2017,  
            unless extended.


          3)Establishes procedural rules for administrative proceedings  
            under CESA.  Some of these provisions sunset on January 1,  
            2017, unless extended. 




          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, any costs are absorbable within existing resources.


          COMMENTS:  This bill is a committee bill that extends the sunset  
          date on several sections of the Fish and Game Code that will  
          otherwise sunset at the end of this year.  The provisions  
          address three different areas:  programs to prevent spread of  
          invasive quagga and zebra mussels, coho salmon recovery  
          strategies, and CESA administrative procedure provisions. 


          Existing law authorizes DFW to conduct inspections and take  
          other actions to prevent the spread of highly invasive  
          dreissenid mussels, including quagga and zebra mussels, and  
          prohibits the transport, possession and import of dreissenid  
          mussels into the state.  This program sunsets at the end of 2017  
          unless extended.  AB 1683 (Wolk), Chapter 419, Statutes of 2007,  
          enacted the quagga and zebra mussel program.  SB 215 (Huff),  
          Chapter 332, Statutes of 2011, extended the sunset date on the  
          program to 2017.  Unfortunately, the threat of quagga and zebra  
          mussel infestations has not been eliminated and thus the need  
          for the program and DFW authorities in this area to continue.








                                                                    AB 2555


                                                                    Page  4







          Existing law authorizes DFW to develop and implement a coho  
          salmon recovery strategy pilot program and sets out what the  
          strategy should contain.  Coho salmon are listed under CESA and  
          continue to be threatened with extinction therefore there is a  
          continuing need for recovery strategies for coho salmon.  These  
          sections will sunset at the end of this year unless extended.   
          Sunset of these provisions does not, however, eliminate DFW's  
          responsibilities for coho salmon recovery efforts.  The  
          authority for the coho salmon recovery strategy program was  
          initially enacted by SB 216 (Sher), Chapter 854, Statutes of  
          2003, and the sunset date on the program was extended to 2017 by  
          SB 749 (Wolk), Chapter 387, Statutes of 2013. 


          SB 749 (Wolk) of 2013, among other things, also made several  
          changes to clarify administrative procedural processes under  
          CESA.  The changes were noncontroversial but a sunset clause was  
          added at the time to ensure there were no unintended  
          consequences.  The changes included clarification of when a  
          public hearing is closed for purposes of finalizing the  
          administrative record in CESA proceedings, and the circumstances  
          under which the administrative record can be reopened.  Such  
          circumstances include material changes in the law and a  
          determination by the Fish and Game Commission (FGC) that  
          additional information is needed to reach a decision on the  
          petition.  The FGC is required, if it reopens the record, to  
          provide an opportunity for public comment on the submitted  
          information prior to the issuance of a decision.  This bill  
          would repeal the sunset clause on these and related provisions  
          thereby allowing them to continue in effect.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Diane Colborn / W., P., & W. / (916) 319-2096     
                                                                  FN:  








                                                                    AB 2555


                                                                    Page  5





          0002776