Amended in Assembly April 18, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 18, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Bill No. 2580

Introduced by Assembly Member Olsen

February 19, 2016

An act to begin delete amend Sections 366.21, 366.22, 366.25, and 366.26 of, and to add Section 398 to, end delete begin insert add Section 16010.7 to end insert the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to juveniles.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2580, as amended, Olsen. begin delete Dependency proceedings. end delete begin insert Foster care: placements. end insert

begin insert

Existing law finds and declares that foster parents are one of the most important sources of information about the children in their care and that courts should know, at the earliest possible date, the interest of a caretaker in providing legal permanency for a child.

end insert begin insert

This bill would authorize a caregiver, if a foster child is removed from his or her care in order to reunify with his or her parent or guardian, to indicate to the child’s social worker that he or she is interested in providing and willing to provide care for the child in the future if the child is in need of foster care placement.

end insert begin delete

Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of his or her parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child, including placement with a licensed foster family home. Existing law prescribes various hearings, including specified review hearings, and other procedures for these purposes. If the court orders the removal of a minor who is adjudged to be a dependent child of the court, existing law requires the court to order the care, custody, control, and conduct of the child to be under the supervision of a social worker who may place the child in specified settings, including a foster home in which the child has been placed before an interruption in foster care, if that placement is in the best interest of the child and space is available or with a foster family agency to be placed in a suitable licensed foster family home or certified family home.

end delete begin delete

The bill would require the social worker, at the time a child is being considered for placement in a foster home, to provide to a foster parent or foster parents of the dependent child specified information, including notification that the foster parent has the right to be present at the dispositional hearing and at any hearing thereafter at which the status of the child is at issue. By imposing additional duties on county welfare agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

end delete begin delete

If a court orders the removal of a child from the physical custody of his or her parent, existing law generally requires the court to order the return of the child to the physical custody of his or her parent at the review hearings held 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months, respectively, after the initial disposition hearing, unless the court finds that the return of the child would create a substantial risk of detriment, or substantial danger, to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. Existing law requires the court to specify the factual basis for its conclusion that the return of the child would create a substantial risk of detriment, or substantial danger, to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child.

end delete begin delete

This bill would require the court to specify in writing the factual basis for its conclusions.

end delete begin delete

If the court determines, based on the assessments provided to the court, by a clear and convincing standard, that it is likely the child will be adopted, existing law requires the court to terminate parental rights and order the child placed for adoption, unless certain circumstances exist, including that the court finds a compelling reason for determining that termination would be detrimental to the child due to one or more specified circumstances. If the court finds that termination of parental rights would be detrimental to the child, existing law requires the court to state its reasons in writing or on the record. Existing law authorizes a child who has not been adopted after the passage of at least 3 years from the date the court terminated parental rights and for whom the court has determined that adoption is no longer the permanent plan to petition the juvenile court to reinstate parental rights pursuant to specified procedures. Existing law requires the court to grant the petition if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child is no longer likely to be adopted and that reinstatement of parental rights is in the best interests of the child. If the court reinstates parental rights over a child who is under 12 years of age, existing law requires the court to specify the factual basis for its conclusion that it is in the best interest of the child to reinstate parental rights.

end delete begin delete

The bill would instead require the court to state its reasons in writing and on the record if the court finds that termination of parental rights would be detrimental to the child, and would require the court to specify in writing the factual basis for its conclusion that it is in the best interest of the child to reinstate parental rights if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child is no longer likely to be adopted.

end delete begin delete

The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes.

end delete begin delete

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

end delete begin delete

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

end delete

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee:  begin delete yes end delete begin insert no end insert . State-mandated local program:  begin delete yes end delete begin insert no end insert .

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

begin insert

begin insert SECTION 1. end insert   

end insert

begin insert Section 16010.7 is added to the end insert begin insert Welfare and
Institutions Code end insert begin insert , to read: end insert

begin insert

begin insert 16010.7. end insert   

end insert begin insert

If a foster child is removed from his or her caregiver
in order to reunify with his or her parent or guardian, the caregiver
may indicate to the child’s social worker at the time the child is
removed from his or her care that the caregiver is interested in
providing and willing to provide care for the child in the future if
the child is removed from his or her parent or guardian and in
need of foster care placement.

end insert

begin delete

SECTION 1.  

Section 366.21 of the Welfare and Institutions
Code is amended to read:

366.21.  

(a) Every hearing conducted by the juvenile court
reviewing the status of a dependent child shall be placed on the
appearance calendar. The court shall advise all persons present at
the hearing of the date of the future hearing and of their right to
be present and represented by counsel.

(b) Except as provided in Sections 294 and 295, notice of the
hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 293.

(c) At least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing, the social
worker shall file a supplemental report with the court regarding
the services provided or offered to the parent or legal guardian to
enable him or her to assume custody and the efforts made to
achieve legal permanence for the child if efforts to reunify fail,
including, but not limited to, efforts to maintain relationships
between a child who is 10 years of age or older and has been in
out-of-home placement for six months or longer and individuals
who are important to the child, consistent with the child’s best
interests; the progress made; and, where relevant, the prognosis
for return of the child to the physical custody of his or her parent
or legal guardian; and shall make his or her recommendation for
disposition. If the child is a member of a sibling group described
in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section
361.5, the report and recommendation may also take into account
those factors described in subdivision (e) relating to the child’s
sibling group. If the recommendation is not to return the child to
a parent or legal guardian, the report shall specify why the return
of the child would be detrimental to the child. The social worker
shall provide the parent or legal guardian, counsel for the child,
and any court-appointed child advocate with a copy of the report,
including his or her recommendation for disposition, at least 10
calendar days prior to the hearing. In the case of a child removed
from the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian,
the social worker shall, at least 10 calendar days prior to the
hearing, provide a summary of his or her recommendation for
disposition to any foster parents, relative caregivers, and certified
foster parents who have been approved for adoption by the State
Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency or by a county adoption agency, community care facility,
or foster family agency having the physical custody of the child.
The social worker shall include a copy of the Judicial Council
Caregiver Information Form (JV-290) with the summary of
recommendations to the child’s foster parents, relative caregivers,
or foster parents approved for adoption, in the caregiver’s primary
language when available, along with information on how to file
the form with the court.

(d) Prior to any hearing involving a child in the physical custody
of a community care facility or a foster family agency that may
result in the return of the child to the physical custody of his or
her parent or legal guardian, or in adoption or the creation of a
legal guardianship, or in the case of an Indian child, in consultation
with the child’s tribe, tribal customary adoption, the facility or
agency shall file with the court a report, or a Judicial Council
Caregiver Information Form (JV-290), containing its
recommendation for disposition. Prior to the hearing involving a
child in the physical custody of a foster parent, a relative caregiver,
or a certified foster parent who has been approved for adoption by
the State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an
adoption agency or by a county adoption agency, the foster parent,
relative caregiver, or the certified foster parent who has been
approved for adoption by the State Department of Social Services
when it is acting as an adoption agency or by a county adoption
agency, may file with the court a report containing his or her
recommendation for disposition. The court shall consider the report
and recommendation filed pursuant to this subdivision prior to
determining any disposition.

(e) (1) At the review hearing held six months after the initial
dispositional hearing, but no later than 12 months after the date
the child entered foster care as determined in Section 361.49,
whichever occurs earlier, after considering the admissible and
relevant evidence, the court shall order the return of the child to
the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless
the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return
of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. At the hearing, the court
shall consider the criminal history, obtained pursuant to paragraph
(1) of subdivision (f) of Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal
guardian subsequent to the child’s removal to the extent that the
criminal record is substantially related to the welfare of the child
or the parent’s or guardian’s ability to exercise custody and control
regarding his or her child, provided the parent or legal guardian
agreed to submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history
information as part of the case plan. The court shall also consider
whether the child can be returned to the custody of his or her parent
who is enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility
that allows a dependent child to reside with his or her parent. The
fact that the parent is enrolled in a certified substance abuse
treatment facility shall not be, for that reason alone, prima facie
evidence of detriment. The failure of the parent or legal guardian
to participate regularly and make substantive progress in
court-ordered treatment programs shall be prima facie evidence
that return would be detrimental. In making its determination, the
court shall review and consider the social worker’s report and
recommendations and the report and recommendations of any child
advocate appointed pursuant to Section 356.5; and shall consider
the efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated by the parent or legal
guardian and the extent to which he or she availed himself or
herself of services provided, taking into account the particular
barriers to a minor parent or a nonminor dependent parent, or an
incarcerated, institutionalized, detained, or deported parent’s or
legal guardian’s access to those court-mandated services and ability
to maintain contact with his or her child.

(2) Regardless of whether the child is returned to a parent or
legal guardian, the court shall specify in writing the factual basis
for its conclusion that the return would be detrimental or would
not be detrimental. The court also shall make appropriate findings
pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366; and, where relevant,
shall order any additional services reasonably believed to facilitate
the return of the child to the custody of his or her parent or legal
guardian. The court shall also inform the parent or legal guardian
that if the child cannot be returned home by the 12-month
permanency hearing, a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may
be instituted. This section does not apply in a case where, pursuant
to Section 361.5, the court has ordered that reunification services
shall not be provided.

(3) If the child was under three years of age on the date of the
initial removal, or is a member of a sibling group described in
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section
361.5, and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that
the parent failed to participate regularly and make substantive
progress in a court-ordered treatment plan, the court may schedule
a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. If, however,
the court finds there is a substantial probability that the child, who
was under three years of age on the date of initial removal or is a
member of a sibling group described in subparagraph (C) of
paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, may be returned
to his or her parent or legal guardian within six months or that
reasonable services have not been provided, the court shall continue
the case to the 12-month permanency hearing. The court shall
specify in writing the factual basis for its conclusion that there is
a substantial probability that the child may be returned to his or
her parent or legal guardian within six months or that reasonable
services have not been provided, justifying continuance to the
12-month permanency hearing.

(4) For the purpose of placing and maintaining a sibling group
together in a permanent home, the court, in making its
determination to schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26
for some or all members of a sibling group, as described in
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section
361.5, shall review and consider the social worker’s report and
recommendations. Factors the report shall address, and the court
shall consider, may include, but need not be limited to, whether
the sibling group was removed from parental care as a group, the
closeness and strength of the sibling bond, the ages of the siblings,
the appropriateness of maintaining the sibling group together, the
detriment to the child if sibling ties are not maintained, the
likelihood of finding a permanent home for the sibling group,
whether the sibling group is currently placed together in a
preadoptive home or has a concurrent plan goal of legal
permanency in the same home, the wishes of each child whose
age and physical and emotional condition permits a meaningful
response, and the best interests of each child in the sibling group.
The court shall specify in writing the factual basis for its finding
that it is in the best interests of each child to schedule a hearing
pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days for some or all of the
members of the sibling group.

(5) If the child was removed initially under subdivision (g) of
Section 300 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence
that the whereabouts of the parent are still unknown, or the parent
has failed to contact and visit the child, the court may schedule a
hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days. The court
shall take into account any particular barriers to a parent’s ability
to maintain contact with his or her child due to the parent’s
incarceration, institutionalization, detention by the United States
Department of Homeland Security, or deportation. If the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the parent has been
convicted of a felony indicating parental unfitness, the court may
schedule a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 within 120 days.

(6) If the child had been placed under court supervision with a
previously noncustodial parent pursuant to Section 361.2, the court
shall determine whether supervision is still necessary. The court
may terminate supervision and transfer permanent custody to that
parent, as provided for by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of
Section 361.2.

(7) In all other cases, the court shall direct that any reunification
services previously ordered shall continue to be offered to the
parent or legal guardian pursuant to the time periods set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5, provided that the court may
modify the terms and conditions of those services.

(8) If the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall determine whether reasonable services
that were designed to aid the parent or legal guardian in
overcoming the problems that led to the initial removal and the
continued custody of the child have been provided or offered to
the parent or legal guardian. The court shall order that those
services be initiated, continued, or terminated.

(f) (1) The permanency hearing shall be held no later than 12
months after the date the child entered foster care, as that date is
determined pursuant to Section 361.49. At the permanency hearing,
the court shall determine the permanent plan for the child, which
shall include a determination of whether the child will be returned
to the child’s home and, if so, when, within the time limits of
subdivision (a) of Section 361.5. After considering the relevant
and admissible evidence, the court shall order the return of the
child to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian
unless the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would
create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or
physical or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker
shall have the burden of establishing that detriment.

(A) At the permanency hearing, the court shall consider the
criminal history, obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision
(f) of Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal guardian subsequent
to the child’s removal to the extent that the criminal record is
substantially related to the welfare of the child or the parent’s or
legal guardian’s ability to exercise custody and control regarding
his or her child, provided that the parent or legal guardian agreed
to submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history information
as part of the case plan. The court shall also determine whether
reasonable services that were designed to aid the parent or legal
guardian to overcome the problems that led to the initial removal
and continued custody of the child have been provided or offered
to the parent or legal guardian.

(B) The court shall also consider whether the child can be
returned to the custody of his or her parent who is enrolled in a
certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent
child to reside with his or her parent. The fact that the parent is
enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility shall not
be, for that reason alone, prima facie evidence of detriment. The
failure of the parent or legal guardian to participate regularly and
make substantive progress in court-ordered treatment programs
shall be prima facie evidence that return would be detrimental.

(C) In making its determination, the court shall review and
consider the social worker’s report and recommendations and the
report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed
pursuant to Section 356.5, shall consider the efforts or progress,
or both, demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent
to which he or she availed himself or herself of services provided,
taking into account the particular barriers to a minor parent or a
nonminor dependent parent, or an incarcerated, institutionalized,
detained, or deported parent’s or legal guardian’s access to those
court-mandated services and ability to maintain contact with his
or her child, and shall make appropriate findings pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Section 366.

(D) For each youth 16 years of age and older, the court shall
also determine whether services have been made available to assist
him or her in making the transition from foster care to successful
adulthood.

(2) Regardless of whether the child is returned to his or her
parent or legal guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis
for its decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify in writing the factual basis for its
conclusion that the return would be detrimental. The court also
shall make a finding pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366. If
the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal guardian, the
court shall consider, and state for the record, in-state and
out-of-state placement options. If the child is placed out of the
state, the court shall make a determination whether the out-of-state
placement continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of
the child.

(g) If the time period in which the court-ordered services were
provided has met or exceeded the time period set forth in
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a)
of Section 361.5, as appropriate, and a child is not returned to the
custody of a parent or legal guardian at the permanency hearing
held pursuant to subdivision (f), the court shall do one of the
following:

(1) Continue the case for up to six months for a permanency
review hearing, provided that the hearing shall occur within 18
months of the date the child was originally taken from the physical
custody of his or her parent or legal guardian. The court shall
continue the case only if it finds that there is a substantial
probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody
of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the
home within the extended period of time or that reasonable services
have not been provided to the parent or legal guardian. For the
purposes of this section, in order to find a substantial probability
that the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the home within
the extended period of time, the court shall be required to find all
of the following:

(A) That the parent or legal guardian has consistently and
regularly contacted and visited with the child.

(B) That the parent or legal guardian has made significant
progress in resolving problems that led to the child’s removal from
the home.

(C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity
and ability both to complete the objectives of his or her treatment
plan and to provide for the child’s safety, protection, physical and
emotional well-being, and special needs.

(i) For purposes of this subdivision, the court’s decision to
continue the case based on a finding or substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian is a compelling reason for determining
that a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best
interests of the child.

(ii) The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if
the child cannot be returned home by the next permanency review
hearing, a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be instituted.
The court shall not order that a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26
be held unless there is clear and convincing evidence that
reasonable services have been provided or offered to the parent or
legal guardian.

(2) Continue the case for up to six months for a permanency
review hearing, provided that the hearing shall occur within 18
months of the date the child was originally taken from the physical
custody of his or her parent or legal guardian, if the parent has
been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the
United States Department of Homeland Security, or deported to
his or her country of origin, and the court determines either that
there is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to
the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and
safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time
or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent
or legal guardian.

(3) For purposes of paragraph (2), in order to find a substantial
probability that the child will be returned to the physical custody
of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely maintained in the
home within the extended period of time, the court shall find all
of the following:

(A) The parent or legal guardian has consistently and regularly
contacted and visited with the child, taking into account any
particular barriers to a parent’s ability to maintain contact with his
or her child due to the parent’s arrest and receipt of an immigration
hold, detention by the United States Department of Homeland
Security, or deportation.

(B) The parent or legal guardian has made significant progress
in resolving the problems that led to the child’s removal from the
home.

(C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity
or ability both to complete the objectives of his or her treatment
plan and to provide for the child’s safety, protection, physical and
emotional well-being, and special needs.

(4) Order that a hearing be held within 120 days, pursuant to
Section 366.26, but only if the court does not continue the case to
the permanency planning review hearing and there is clear and
convincing evidence that reasonable services have been provided
or offered to the parents or legal guardians. On and after January
1, 2012, a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 shall not be ordered
if the child is a nonminor dependent, unless the nonminor
dependent is an Indian child and tribal customary adoption is
recommended as the permanent plan.

(5) Order that the child remain in foster care, but only if the
court finds by clear and convincing evidence, based upon the
evidence already presented to it, including a recommendation by
the State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an
adoption agency or by a county adoption agency, that there is a
compelling reason for determining that a hearing held pursuant to
Section 366.26 is not in the best interests of the child because the
child is not a proper subject for adoption and has no one willing
to accept legal guardianship as of the hearing date. For purposes
of this section, a recommendation by the State Department of
Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency or by a
county adoption agency that adoption is not in the best interests
of the child shall constitute a compelling reason for the court’s
determination. That recommendation shall be based on the present
circumstances of the child and shall not preclude a different
recommendation at a later date if the child’s circumstances change.
On and after January 1, 2012, the nonminor dependent’s legal
status as an adult is in and of itself a compelling reason not to hold
a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26. The court may order that a
nonminor dependent who otherwise is eligible pursuant to Section
11403 remain in a planned, permanent living arrangement.

(A) The court shall make factual findings identifying any
barriers to achieving the permanent plan as of the hearing date.
When the child is under 16 years of age, the court shall order a
permanent plan of return home, adoption, tribal customary adoption
in the case of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement
with a fit and willing relative, as appropriate. When the child is
16 years of age or older, or is a nonminor dependent, and no other
permanent plan is appropriate at the time of the hearing, the court
may order another planned permanent living arrangement, as
described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 16501.

(B) If the court orders that a child who is 10 years of age or
older remain in foster care, the court shall determine whether the
agency has made reasonable efforts to maintain the child’s
relationships with individuals other than the child’s siblings who
are important to the child, consistent with the child’s best interests,
and may make any appropriate order to ensure that those
relationships are maintained.

(C) If the child is not returned to his or her parent or legal
guardian, the court shall consider, and state for the record, in-state
and out-of-state options for permanent placement. If the child is
placed out of the state, the court shall make a determination
whether the out-of-state placement continues to be appropriate and
in the best interests of the child.

(h) In any case in which the court orders that a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26 shall be held, it shall also order the termination
of reunification services to the parent or legal guardian. The court
shall continue to permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the
child pending the hearing unless it finds that visitation would be
detrimental to the child. The court shall make any other appropriate
orders to enable the child to maintain relationships with individuals,
other than the child’s siblings, who are important to the child,
consistent with the child’s best interests. When the court orders a
termination of reunification services to the parent or legal guardian,
it shall also order that the child’s caregiver receive the child’s birth
certificate in accordance with Sections 16010.4 and 16010.5.
Additionally, when the court orders a termination of reunification
services to the parent or legal guardian, it shall order, when
appropriate, that a child who is 16 years of age or older receive
his or her birth certificate.

(i) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to
Section 366.26, including, when, in consultation with the child’s
tribe, tribal customary adoption is recommended, shall be held, it
shall direct the agency supervising the child and the county
adoption agency, or the State Department of Social Services when
it is acting as an adoption agency, to prepare an assessment that
shall include:

(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents or
legal guardians.

(B) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents or legal guardians and other
members of his or her extended family since the time of placement.
Although the extended family of each child shall be reviewed on
a case-by-case basis, “extended family” for the purpose of this
subparagraph shall include, but not be limited to, the child’s
siblings, grandparents, aunts, and uncles.

(C) An evaluation of the child’s medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.

(D) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment
of any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
including the prospective tribal customary adoptive parent,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse
or neglect, the capability to meet the child’s needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed guardian is a relative
of the minor, the assessment shall also consider, but need not be
limited to, all of the factors specified in subdivision (a) of Section
361.3 and in Section 361.4.

(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, the duration and character of
the relationship, the degree of attachment of the child to the
prospective relative guardian or adoptive parent, the relative’s or
adoptive parent’s strong commitment to caring permanently for
the child, the motivation for seeking adoption or guardianship, a
statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption
or guardianship, and whether the child, if over 12 years of age,
has been consulted about the proposed relative guardianship
arrangements, unless the child’s age or physical, emotional, or
other condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and if
so, a description of the condition.

(F) A description of efforts to be made to identify a prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, including, but not limited to,
child-specific recruitment and listing on an adoption exchange
within the state or out of the state.

(G) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.

(H) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (G), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child’s tribe, a
tribal customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is
recommended. If tribal customary adoption is recommended, the
assessment shall include an analysis of both of the following:

(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.

(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned
to the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons
for reaching that conclusion.

(2) (A) A relative caregiver’s preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.

(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency
options of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term
benefits and consequences of each option, prior to establishing
legal guardianship or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent
plan is guardianship with an approved relative caregiver for a
minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided
for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of Chapter 2
of Part 3 of Division 9, the relative caregiver shall be informed
about the terms and conditions of the negotiated agreement
pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree to its execution prior to
the hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26. A copy of the executed
negotiated agreement shall be attached to the assessment.

(j) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with an approved relative
caregiver, and juvenile court dependency is subsequently
dismissed, the minor shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP
Program, as provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section
11360) or Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385), as
applicable, of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9.

(k) As used in this section, “relative” means an adult who is
related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words “great,”
“great-great,” or “grand,” or the spouse of any of those persons
even if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. If the
proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved relative
caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program,
as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385)
of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, “relative” as used in this
section has the same meaning as “relative” as defined in
subdivision (c) of Section 11391.

(l) For purposes of this section, evidence of any of the following
circumstances shall not, in and of itself, be deemed a failure to
provide or offer reasonable services:

(1) The child has been placed with a foster family that is eligible
to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.

(2) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.

(3) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for
the child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.

SEC. 2.  

Section 366.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code
is amended to read:

366.22.  

(a) (1) If a case has been continued pursuant to
paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 366.21, the
permanency review hearing shall occur within 18 months after the
date the child was originally removed from the physical custody
of his or her parent or legal guardian. After considering the
admissible and relevant evidence, the court shall order the return
of the child to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal
guardian unless the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence,
that the return of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian
would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection,
or physical or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker
shall have the burden of establishing that detriment. At the
permanency review hearing, the court shall consider the criminal
history, obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) of
Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal guardian subsequent to the
child’s removal, to the extent that the criminal record is
substantially related to the welfare of the child or the parent’s or
legal guardian’s ability to exercise custody and control regarding
his or her child, provided that the parent or legal guardian agreed
to submit fingerprint images to obtain criminal history information
as part of the case plan. The court shall also consider whether the
child can be returned to the custody of his or her parent who is
enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows
a dependent child to reside with his or her parent. The fact that the
parent is enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility
shall not be, for that reason alone, prima facie evidence of
detriment. The failure of the parent or legal guardian to participate
regularly and make substantive progress in court-ordered treatment
programs shall be prima facie evidence that return would be
detrimental. In making its determination, the court shall review
and consider the social worker’s report and recommendations and
the report and recommendations of any child advocate appointed
pursuant to Section 356.5; shall consider the efforts or progress,
or both, demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent
to which he or she availed himself or herself of services provided,
taking into account the particular barriers of a minor parent or a
nonminor dependent parent, or an incarcerated or institutionalized
parent’s or legal guardian’s access to those court-mandated services
and ability to maintain contact with his or her child; and shall make
appropriate findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 366.

(2) Whether or not the child is returned to his or her parent or
legal guardian, the court shall specify in writing the factual basis
for its decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its conclusion
that return would be detrimental. If the child is not returned to his
or her parent or legal guardian, the court shall consider, and state
for the record, in-state and out-of-state options for the child’s
permanent placement. If the child is placed out of the state, the
court shall make a determination whether the out-of-state placement
continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of the child.

(3) Unless the conditions in subdivision (b) are met and the
child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian at the permanency
review hearing, the court shall order that a hearing be held pursuant
to Section 366.26 in order to determine whether adoption, or, in
the case of an Indian child, in consultation with the child’s tribe,
tribal customary adoption, guardianship, or continued placement
in foster care is the most appropriate plan for the child. On and
after January 1, 2012, a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 shall
not be ordered if the child is a nonminor dependent, unless the
nonminor dependent is an Indian child, and tribal customary
adoption is recommended as the permanent plan. However, if the
court finds by clear and convincing evidence, based on the evidence
already presented to it, including a recommendation by the State
Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption
agency or by a county adoption agency, that there is a compelling
reason, as described in paragraph (5) of subdivision (g) of Section
366.21, for determining that a hearing held under Section 366.26
is not in the best interests of the child because the child is not a
proper subject for adoption and has no one willing to accept legal
guardianship as of the hearing date, the court may, only under
these circumstances, order that the child remain in foster care with
a permanent plan of return home, adoption, tribal customary
adoption in the case of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or
placement with a fit and willing relative, as appropriate. If the
child is 16 years of age or older or is a nonminor dependent, and
no other permanent plan is appropriate at the time of the hearing,
the court may order another planned permanent living arrangement,
as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 16501.
The court shall make factual findings identifying any barriers to
achieving the permanent plan as of the hearing date. On and after
January 1, 2012, the nonminor dependent’s legal status as an adult
is in and of itself a compelling reason not to hold a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26. The court may order that a nonminor dependent
who otherwise is eligible pursuant to Section 11403 remain in a
planned, permanent living arrangement. If the court orders that a
child who is 10 years of age or older remain in foster care, the
court shall determine whether the agency has made reasonable
efforts to maintain the child’s relationships with individuals other
than the child’s siblings who are important to the child, consistent
with the child’s best interests, and may make any appropriate order
to ensure that those relationships are maintained. The hearing shall
be held no later than 120 days from the date of the permanency
review hearing. The court shall also order termination of
reunification services to the parent or legal guardian. The court
shall continue to permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the
child unless it finds that visitation would be detrimental to the
child. The court shall determine whether reasonable services have
been offered or provided to the parent or legal guardian. For
purposes of this subdivision, evidence of any of the following
circumstances shall not, in and of themselves, be deemed a failure
to provide or offer reasonable services:

(A) The child has been placed with a foster family that is eligible
to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.

(B) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.

(C) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for
the child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.

(b) (1) If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian
at the permanency review hearing and the court determines by
clear and convincing evidence that the best interests of the child
would be met by the provision of additional reunification services
to a parent or legal guardian who is making significant and
consistent progress in a court-ordered residential substance abuse
treatment program, a parent who was either a minor parent or a
nonminor dependent parent at the time of the initial hearing making
significant and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for
the child’s return, or a parent recently discharged from
incarceration, institutionalization, or the custody of the United
States Department of Homeland Security and making significant
and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for the child’s
return, the court may continue the case for up to six months for a
subsequent permanency review hearing, provided that the hearing
shall occur within 24 months of the date the child was originally
taken from the physical custody of his or her parent or legal
guardian. The court shall continue the case only if it finds that
there is a substantial probability that the child will be returned to
the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and
safely maintained in the home within the extended period of time
or that reasonable services have not been provided to the parent
or legal guardian. For the purposes of this section, in order to find
a substantial probability that the child will be returned to the
physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian and safely
maintained in the home within the extended period of time, the
court shall be required to find all of the following:

(A) That the parent or legal guardian has consistently and
regularly contacted and visited with the child.

(B) That the parent or legal guardian has made significant and
consistent progress in the prior 18 months in resolving problems
that led to the child’s removal from the home.

(C) The parent or legal guardian has demonstrated the capacity
and ability both to complete the objectives of his or her substance
abuse treatment plan as evidenced by reports from a substance
abuse provider as applicable, or complete a treatment plan
postdischarge from incarceration, institutionalization, or detention,
or following deportation to his or her country of origin and his or
her return to the United States, and to provide for the child’s safety,
protection, physical and emotional well-being, and special needs.

(2) For purposes of this subdivision, the court’s decision to
continue the case based on a finding or substantial probability that
the child will be returned to the physical custody of his or her
parent or legal guardian is a compelling reason for determining
that a hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26 is not in the best
interests of the child.

(3) The court shall inform the parent or legal guardian that if
the child cannot be returned home by the subsequent permanency
review hearing, a proceeding pursuant to Section 366.26 may be
instituted. The court shall not order that a hearing pursuant to
Section 366.26 be held unless there is clear and convincing
evidence that reasonable services have been provided or offered
to the parent or legal guardian.

(c) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to
Section 366.26, including when a tribal customary adoption is
recommended, shall be held, it shall direct the agency supervising
the child and the county adoption agency, or the State Department
of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency, to
prepare an assessment that shall include:

(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents.

(B) A review of the amount of and nature of any contact between
the child and his or her parents and other members of his or her
extended family since the time of placement. Although the
extended family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis, “extended family” for the purposes of this subparagraph
shall include, but not be limited to, the child’s siblings,
grandparents, aunts, and uncles.

(C) An evaluation of the child’s medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.

(D)  A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment
of any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse
or neglect, the capability to meet the child’s needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed legal guardian is a
relative of the minor, the assessment shall also consider, but need
not be limited to, all of the factors specified in subdivision (a) of
Section 361.3 and Section 361.4.

(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, the duration and character of
the relationship, the degree of attachment of the child to the
prospective relative guardian or adoptive parent, the relative’s or
adoptive parent’s strong commitment to caring permanently for
the child, the motivation for seeking adoption or legal guardianship,
a statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption
or legal guardianship, and whether the child, if over 12 years of
age, has been consulted about the proposed relative guardianship
arrangements, unless the child’s age or physical, emotional, or
other condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and if
so, a description of the condition.

(F) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.

(G) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (F), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child’s tribe, a
tribal customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is
recommended. If tribal customary adoption is recommended, the
assessment shall include an analysis of both of the following:

(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.

(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned
to the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons
for reaching that conclusion.

(2) (A) A relative caregiver’s preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.

(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency
options of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term
benefits and consequences of each option, prior to establishing
legal guardianship or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent
plan is guardianship with an approved relative caregiver for a
minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided
for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of Chapter 2
of Part 3 of Division 9, the relative caregiver shall be informed
about the terms and conditions of the negotiated agreement
pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree to its execution prior to
the hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26. A copy of the executed
negotiated agreement shall be attached to the assessment.

(d) If at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a legal
guardianship is established for the minor with an approved relative
caregiver, and juvenile court dependency is subsequently
dismissed, the minor shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP
Program, as provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section
11360) or Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385), as
applicable, of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9.

(e) As used in this section, “relative” means an adult who is
related to the child by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words “great,”
“great-great,” or “grand,” or the spouse of any of those persons
even if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. If the
proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved relative
caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program,
as provided for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385)
of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, “relative” as used in this
section has the same meaning as “relative” as defined in
subdivision (c) of Section 11391.

SEC. 3.  

Section 366.25 of the Welfare and Institutions Code
is amended to read:

366.25.  

(a) (1) If a case has been continued pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 366.22, the subsequent permanency
review hearing shall occur within 24 months after the date the
child was originally removed from the physical custody of his or
her parent or legal guardian. After considering the relevant and
admissible evidence, the court shall order the return of the child
to the physical custody of his or her parent or legal guardian unless
the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the return
of the child to his or her parent or legal guardian would create a
substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical
or emotional well-being of the child. The social worker shall have
the burden of establishing that detriment. At the subsequent
permanency review hearing, the court shall consider the criminal
history, obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) of
Section 16504.5, of the parent or legal guardian subsequent to the
child’s removal to the extent that the criminal record is substantially
related to the welfare of the child or parent’s or legal guardian’s
ability to exercise custody and control regarding his or her child
provided that the parent or legal guardian agreed to submit
fingerprint images to obtain criminal history information as part
of the case plan. The court shall also consider whether the child
can be returned to the custody of a parent who is enrolled in a
certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent
child to reside with his or her parent. The fact that the parent is
enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility shall not
be, for that reason alone, prima facie evidence of detriment. The
failure of the parent or legal guardian to participate regularly and
make substantive progress in court-ordered treatment programs
shall be prima facie evidence that return would be detrimental. In
making its determination, the court shall review and consider the
social worker’s report and recommendations and the report and
recommendations of any child advocate appointed pursuant to
Section 356.5; shall consider the efforts or progress, or both,
demonstrated by the parent or legal guardian and the extent to
which he or she availed himself or herself of services provided;
and shall make appropriate findings pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 366.

(2) Whether or not the child is returned to his or her parent or
legal guardian, the court shall specify in writing the factual basis
for its decision. If the child is not returned to a parent or legal
guardian, the court shall specify the factual basis for its conclusion
that return would be detrimental. If the child is not returned to his
or her parent or legal guardian, the court shall consider and state
for the record, in-state and out-of-state options for the child’s
permanent placement. If the child is placed out of the state, the
court shall make a determination whether the out-of-state placement
continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of the child.

(3) If the child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian at
the subsequent permanency review hearing, the court shall order
that a hearing be held pursuant to Section 366.26 in order to
determine whether adoption, or, in the case of an Indian child,
tribal customary adoption, guardianship, or, in the case of a child
16 years of age or older when no other permanent plan is
appropriate, another planned permanent living arrangement is the
most appropriate plan for the child. On and after January 1, 2012,
a hearing pursuant to Section 366.26 shall not be ordered if the
child is a nonminor dependent, unless the nonminor dependent is
an Indian child and tribal customary adoption is recommended as
the permanent plan. However, if the court finds by clear and
convincing evidence, based on the evidence already presented to
it, including a recommendation by the State Department of Social
Services when it is acting as an adoption agency or by a county
adoption agency, that there is a compelling reason, as described
in paragraph (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 366.21, for
determining that a hearing held under Section 366.26 is not in the
best interest of the child because the child is not a proper subject
for adoption or, in the case of an Indian child, tribal customary
adoption, and has no one willing to accept legal guardianship as
of the hearing date, then the court may, only under these
circumstances, order that the child remain in foster care with a
permanent plan of return home, adoption, tribal customary adoption
in the case of an Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement
with a fit and willing relative, as appropriate. If the child is 16
years of age or older or is a nonminor dependent, and no other
permanent plan is appropriate at the time of the hearing, the court
may order another planned permanent living arrangement, as
described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (i) of Section 16501.
The court shall make factual findings identifying any barriers to
achieving the permanent plan as of the hearing date. On and after
January 1, 2012, the nonminor dependent’s legal status as an adult
is in and of itself a compelling reason not to hold a hearing pursuant
to Section 366.26. The court may order that a nonminor dependent
who otherwise is eligible pursuant to Section 11403 remain in a
planned, permanent living arrangement. If the court orders that a
child who is 10 years of age or older remain in foster care, the
court shall determine whether the agency has made reasonable
efforts to maintain the child’s relationships with individuals other
than the child’s siblings who are important to the child, consistent
with the child’s best interests, and may make any appropriate order
to ensure that those relationships are maintained. The hearing shall
be held no later than 120 days from the date of the subsequent
permanency review hearing. The court shall also order termination
of reunification services to the parent or legal guardian. The court
shall continue to permit the parent or legal guardian to visit the
child unless it finds that visitation would be detrimental to the
child. The court shall determine whether reasonable services have
been offered or provided to the parent or legal guardian. For
purposes of this paragraph, evidence of any of the following
circumstances shall not, in and of themselves, be deemed a failure
to provide or offer reasonable services:

(A) The child has been placed with a foster family that is eligible
to adopt a child, or has been placed in a preadoptive home.

(B) The case plan includes services to make and finalize a
permanent placement for the child if efforts to reunify fail.

(C) Services to make and finalize a permanent placement for
the child, if efforts to reunify fail, are provided concurrently with
services to reunify the family.

(b) (1) Whenever a court orders that a hearing pursuant to
Section 366.26 shall be held, it shall direct the agency supervising
the child and the county adoption agency, or the State Department
of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency, to
prepare an assessment that shall include:

(A) Current search efforts for an absent parent or parents.

(B) A review of the amount of, and nature of, any contact
between the child and his or her parents and other members of his
or her extended family since the time of placement. Although the
extended family of each child shall be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis, “extended family” for the purposes of this paragraph shall
include, but not be limited to, the child’s siblings, grandparents,
aunts, and uncles.

(C) An evaluation of the child’s medical, developmental,
scholastic, mental, and emotional status.

(D) A preliminary assessment of the eligibility and commitment
of any identified prospective adoptive parent or legal guardian,
including a prospective tribal customary adoptive parent,
particularly the caretaker, to include a social history including
screening for criminal records and prior referrals for child abuse
or neglect, the capability to meet the child’s needs, and the
understanding of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities
of adoption and guardianship. If a proposed legal guardian is a
relative of the minor, the assessment shall also consider, but need
not be limited to, all of the factors specified in subdivision (a) of
Section 361.3 and in Section 361.4.

(E) The relationship of the child to any identified prospective
adoptive parent or legal guardian, including a prospective tribal
customary adoptive parent, the duration and character of the
relationship, the degree of attachment of the child to the prospective
relative guardian or adoptive parent, the relative’s or adoptive
parent’s strong commitment to caring permanently for the child,
the motivation for seeking adoption or legal guardianship, a
statement from the child concerning placement and the adoption
or legal guardianship, and whether the child, if over 12 years of
age, has been consulted about the proposed relative guardianship
arrangements, unless the child’s age or physical, emotional, or
other condition precludes his or her meaningful response, and if
so, a description of the condition.

(F) An analysis of the likelihood that the child will be adopted
if parental rights are terminated.

(G) In the case of an Indian child, in addition to subparagraphs
(A) to (F), inclusive, an assessment of the likelihood that the child
will be adopted, when, in consultation with the child’s tribe, a
tribal customary adoption, as defined in Section 366.24, is
recommended. If tribal customary adoption is recommended, the
assessment shall include an analysis of both of the following:

(i) Whether tribal customary adoption would or would not be
detrimental to the Indian child and the reasons for reaching that
conclusion.

(ii) Whether the Indian child cannot or should not be returned
to the home of the Indian parent or Indian custodian and the reasons
for reaching that conclusion.

(2) (A) A relative caregiver’s preference for legal guardianship
over adoption, if it is due to circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, shall not constitute the sole basis for recommending removal
of the child from the relative caregiver for purposes of adoptive
placement.

(B) Regardless of his or her immigration status, a relative
caregiver shall be given information regarding the permanency
options of guardianship and adoption, including the long-term
benefits and consequences of each option, prior to establishing
legal guardianship or pursuing adoption. If the proposed permanent
plan is guardianship with an approved relative caregiver for a
minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program, as provided
for in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of Chapter 2
of Part 3 of Division 9, the relative caregiver shall be informed
about the terms and conditions of the negotiated agreement
pursuant to Section 11387 and shall agree to its execution prior to
the hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26. A copy of the executed
negotiated agreement shall be attached to the assessment.

(c) If, at any hearing held pursuant to Section 366.26, a
guardianship is established for the minor with an approved relative
caregiver, and juvenile court dependency is subsequently
dismissed, the minor shall be eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP
Program, as provided for in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section
11360) or Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385), as
applicable, of Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9.

(d) As used in this section, “relative” means an adult who is
related to the minor by blood, adoption, or affinity within the fifth
degree of kinship, including stepparents, stepsiblings, and all
relatives whose status is preceded by the words “great,”
“great-great,” or “grand,” or the spouse of any of those persons
even if the marriage was terminated by death or dissolution. If the
proposed permanent plan is guardianship with an approved relative
caregiver for a minor eligible for aid under the Kin-GAP Program,
as provided in Article 4.7 (commencing with Section 11385) of
Chapter 2 of Part 3 of Division 9, “relative” as used in this section
has the same meaning as “relative” as defined in subdivision (c)
of Section 11391.

SEC. 4.  

Section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code
is amended to read:

366.26.  

(a) This section applies to children who are adjudged
dependent children of the juvenile court pursuant to subdivision
(d) of Section 360. The procedures specified herein are the
exclusive procedures for conducting these hearings; Part 2
(commencing with Section 3020) of Division 8 of the Family Code
is not applicable to these proceedings. Section 8616.5 of the Family
Code is applicable and available to all dependent children meeting
the requirements of that section, if the postadoption contact
agreement has been entered into voluntarily. For children who are
adjudged dependent children of the juvenile court pursuant to
subdivision (d) of Section 360, this section and Sections 8604,
8605, 8606, and 8700 of the Family Code and Chapter 5
(commencing with Section 7660) of Part 3 of Division 12 of the
Family Code specify the exclusive procedures for permanently
terminating parental rights with regard to, or establishing legal
guardianship of, the child while the child is a dependent child of
the juvenile court.

(b) At the hearing, which shall be held in juvenile court for all
children who are dependents of the juvenile court, the court, in
order to provide stable, permanent homes for these children, shall
review the report as specified in Section 361.5, 366.21, 366.22, or
366.25, shall indicate that the court has read and considered it,
shall receive other evidence that the parties may present, and then
shall make findings and orders in the following order of preference:

(1) Terminate the rights of the parent or parents and order that
the child be placed for adoption and, upon the filing of a petition
for adoption in the juvenile court, order that a hearing be set. The
court shall proceed with the adoption after the appellate rights of
the natural parents have been exhausted.

(2) Order, without termination of parental rights, the plan of
tribal customary adoption, as described in Section 366.24, through
tribal custom, traditions, or law of the Indian child’s tribe, and
upon the court affording the tribal customary adoption order full
faith and credit at the continued selection and implementation
hearing, order that a hearing be set pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (e).

(3) Appoint a relative or relatives with whom the child is
currently residing as legal guardian or guardians for the child, and
order that letters of guardianship issue.

(4) On making a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (c),
identify adoption or tribal customary adoption as the permanent
placement goal and order that efforts be made to locate an
appropriate adoptive family for the child within a period not to
exceed 180 days.

(5) Appoint a nonrelative legal guardian for the child and order
that letters of guardianship issue.

(6) Order that the child be permanently placed with a fit and
willing relative, subject to the periodic review of the juvenile court
under Section 366.3.

(7) Order that the child remain in foster care, subject to the
conditions described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (c) and the
periodic review of the juvenile court under Section 366.3.

In choosing among the above alternatives the court shall proceed
pursuant to subdivision (c).

(c) (1) If the court determines, based on the assessment provided
as ordered under subdivision (i) of Section 366.21, subdivision (b)
of Section 366.22, or subdivision (b) of Section 366.25, and any
other relevant evidence, by a clear and convincing standard, that
it is likely the child will be adopted, the court shall terminate
parental rights and order the child placed for adoption. The fact
that the child is not yet placed in a preadoptive home nor with a
relative or foster family who is prepared to adopt the child, shall
not constitute a basis for the court to conclude that it is not likely
the child will be adopted. A finding under subdivision (b) or
paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 361.5 that reunification
services shall not be offered, under subdivision (e) of Section
366.21 that the whereabouts of a parent have been unknown for
six months or that the parent has failed to visit or contact the child
for six months, or that the parent has been convicted of a felony
indicating parental unfitness, or, under Section 366.21 or 366.22,
that the court has continued to remove the child from the custody
of the parent or guardian and has terminated reunification services,
shall constitute a sufficient basis for termination of parental rights.
Under these circumstances, the court shall terminate parental rights
unless either of the following applies:

(A) The child is living with a relative who is unable or unwilling
to adopt the child because of circumstances that do not include an
unwillingness to accept legal or financial responsibility for the
child, but who is willing and capable of providing the child with
a stable and permanent environment through legal guardianship,
and the removal of the child from the custody of his or her relative
would be detrimental to the emotional well-being of the child. For
purposes of an Indian child, “relative” shall include an “extended
family member,” as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare
Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1903(2)).

(B) The court finds a compelling reason for determining that
termination would be detrimental to the child due to one or more
of the following circumstances:

(i) The parents have maintained regular visitation and contact
with the child and the child would benefit from continuing the
relationship.

(ii) A child 12 years of age or older objects to termination of
parental rights.

(iii) The child is placed in a residential treatment facility,
adoption is unlikely or undesirable, and continuation of parental
rights will not prevent finding the child a permanent family
placement if the parents cannot resume custody when residential
care is no longer needed.

(iv) The child is living with a foster parent or Indian custodian
who is unable or unwilling to adopt the child because of
exceptional circumstances, that do not include an unwillingness
to accept legal or financial responsibility for the child, but who is
willing and capable of providing the child with a stable and
permanent environment and the removal of the child from the
physical custody of his or her foster parent or Indian custodian
would be detrimental to the emotional well-being of the child. This
clause does not apply to any child who is either (I) under six years
of age or (II) a member of a sibling group where at least one child
is under six years of age and the siblings are, or should be,
permanently placed together.

(v) There would be substantial interference with a child’s sibling
relationship, taking into consideration the nature and extent of the
relationship, including, but not limited to, whether the child was
raised with a sibling in the same home, whether the child shared
significant common experiences or has existing close and strong
bonds with a sibling, and whether ongoing contact is in the child’s
best interest, including the child’s long-term emotional interest,
as compared to the benefit of legal permanence through adoption.

(vi) The child is an Indian child and there is a compelling reason
for determining that termination of parental rights would not be
in the best interest of the child, including, but not limited to:

(I) Termination of parental rights would substantially interfere
with the child’s connection to his or her tribal community or the
child’s tribal membership rights.

(II) The child’s tribe has identified guardianship, foster care
with a fit and willing relative, tribal customary adoption, or another
planned permanent living arrangement for the child.

(III) The child is a nonminor dependent, and the nonminor and
the nonminor’s tribe have identified tribal customary adoption for
the nonminor.

(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case of tribal
customary adoptions, Section 366.24 shall apply.

(D) If the court finds that termination of parental rights would
be detrimental to the child pursuant to clause (i), (ii), (iii), (iv),
(v), or (vi), it shall state its reasons in writing and on the record.

(2) The court shall not terminate parental rights if:

(A) At each hearing at which the court was required to consider
reasonable efforts or services, the court has found that reasonable
efforts were not made or that reasonable services were not offered
or provided.

(B) In the case of an Indian child:

(i) At the hearing terminating parental rights, the court has found
that active efforts were not made as required in Section 361.7.

(ii) The court does not make a determination at the hearing
terminating parental rights, supported by evidence beyond a
reasonable doubt, including testimony of one or more “qualified
expert witnesses” as defined in Section 224.6, that the continued
custody of the child by the parent is likely to result in serious
emotional or physical damage to the child.

(iii) The court has ordered tribal customary adoption pursuant
to Section 366.24.

(3) If the court finds that termination of parental rights would
not be detrimental to the child pursuant to paragraph (1) and that
the child has a probability for adoption but is difficult to place for
adoption and there is no identified or available prospective adoptive
parent, the court may identify adoption as the permanent placement
goal and without terminating parental rights, order that efforts be
made to locate an appropriate adoptive family for the child, within
the state or out of the state, within a period not to exceed 180 days.
During this 180-day period, the public agency responsible for
seeking adoptive parents for each child shall, to the extent possible,
ask each child who is 10 years of age or older, to identify any
individuals, other than the child’s siblings, who are important to
the child, in order to identify potential adoptive parents. The public
agency may ask any other child to provide that information, as
appropriate. During the 180-day period, the public agency shall,
to the extent possible, contact other private and public adoption
agencies regarding the availability of the child for adoption. During
the 180-day period, the public agency shall conduct the search for
adoptive parents in the same manner as prescribed for children in
Sections 8708 and 8709 of the Family Code. At the expiration of
this period, another hearing shall be held and the court shall
proceed pursuant to paragraph (1), (2), (3), (5), or (6) of subdivision
(b). For purposes of this section, a child may only be found to be
difficult to place for adoption if there is no identified or available
prospective adoptive parent for the child because of the child’s
membership in a sibling group, or the presence of a diagnosed
medical, physical, or mental handicap, or the child is seven years
of age or more.

(4) (A) If the court finds that adoption of the child or
termination of parental rights is not in the best interest of the child,
because one of the conditions in clause (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), or
(vi) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) or in paragraph (2)
applies, the court shall order that the present caretakers or other
appropriate persons shall become legal guardians of the child, or,
in the case of an Indian child, consider a tribal customary adoption
pursuant to Section 366.24. Legal guardianship shall be considered
before continuing the child in foster care under any other permanent
plan, if it is in the best interests of the child and if a suitable
guardian can be found. If the child continues in foster care, the
court shall make factual findings identifying any barriers to
achieving adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case of an
Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing
relative as of the date of the hearing. A child who is 10 years of
age or older, shall be asked to identify any individuals, other than
the child’s siblings, who are important to the child, in order to
identify potential guardians or, in the case of an Indian child,
prospective tribal customary adoptive parents. The agency may
ask any other child to provide that information, as appropriate.

(B) (i) If the child is living with an approved relative who is
willing and capable of providing a stable and permanent
environment, but not willing to become a legal guardian as of the
hearing date, the court shall order a permanent plan of placement
with a fit and willing relative, and the child shall not be removed
from the home if the court finds the removal would be seriously
detrimental to the emotional well-being of the child because the
child has substantial psychological ties to the relative caretaker.

(ii) If the child is living with a nonrelative caregiver who is
willing and capable of providing a stable and permanent
environment, but not willing to become a legal guardian as of the
hearing date, the court shall order that the child remain in foster
care with a permanent plan of return home, adoption, legal
guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing relative, as
appropriate. If the child is 16 years of age or older, or a nonminor
dependent, and no other permanent plan is appropriate at the time
of the hearing, the court may order another planned permanent
living arrangement, as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision
(i) of Section 16501. Regardless of the age of the child, the child
shall not be removed from the home if the court finds the removal
would be seriously detrimental to the emotional well-being of the
child because the child has substantial psychological ties to the
caregiver.

(iii) If the child is living in a group home or, on or after January
1, 2017, a short-term residential treatment center, the court shall
order that the child remain in foster care with a permanent plan of
return home, adoption, tribal customary adoption in the case of an
Indian child, legal guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing
relative, as appropriate. If the child is 16 years of age or older, or
a nonminor dependent, and no other permanent plan is appropriate
at the time of the hearing, the court may order another planned
permanent living arrangement, as described in paragraph (2) of
subdivision (i) of Section 16501.

(C) The court shall also make an order for visitation with the
parents or guardians unless the court finds by a preponderance of
the evidence that the visitation would be detrimental to the physical
or emotional well-being of the child.

(5) If the court finds that the child should not be placed for
adoption, that legal guardianship shall not be established, that
placement with a fit and willing relative is not appropriate as of
the hearing date, and that there are no suitable foster parents except
exclusive-use homes available to provide the child with a stable
and permanent environment, the court may order the care, custody,
and control of the child transferred from the county welfare
department to a licensed foster family agency. The court shall
consider the written recommendation of the county welfare director
regarding the suitability of the transfer. The transfer shall be subject
to further court orders.

The licensed foster family agency shall place the child in a
suitable licensed or exclusive-use home that has been certified by
the agency as meeting licensing standards. The licensed foster
family agency shall be responsible for supporting the child and
providing appropriate services to the child, including those services
ordered by the court. Responsibility for the support of the child
shall not, in and of itself, create liability on the part of the foster
family agency to third persons injured by the child. Those children
whose care, custody, and control are transferred to a foster family
agency shall not be eligible for foster care maintenance payments
or child welfare services, except for emergency response services
pursuant to Section 16504.

(d) The proceeding for the appointment of a guardian for a child
who is a dependent of the juvenile court shall be in the juvenile
court. If the court finds pursuant to this section that legal
guardianship is the appropriate permanent plan, it shall appoint
the legal guardian and issue letters of guardianship. The assessment
prepared pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section 361.5, subdivision
(i) of Section 366.21, subdivision (b) of Section 366.22, and
subdivision (b) of Section 366.25 shall be read and considered by
the court prior to the appointment, and this shall be reflected in
the minutes of the court. The person preparing the assessment may
be called and examined by any party to the proceeding.

(e) (1) The proceeding for the adoption of a child who is a
dependent of the juvenile court shall be in the juvenile court if the
court finds pursuant to this section that adoption is the appropriate
permanent plan and the petition for adoption is filed in the juvenile
court. Upon the filing of a petition for adoption, the juvenile court
shall order that an adoption hearing be set. The court shall proceed
with the adoption after the appellate rights of the natural parents
have been exhausted. The full report required by Section 8715 of
the Family Code shall be read and considered by the court prior
to the adoption and this shall be reflected in the minutes of the
court. The person preparing the report may be called and examined
by any party to the proceeding. It is the intent of the Legislature,
pursuant to this subdivision, to give potential adoptive parents the
option of filing in the juvenile court the petition for the adoption
of a child who is a dependent of the juvenile court. Nothing in this
section is intended to prevent the filing of a petition for adoption
in any other court as permitted by law, instead of in the juvenile
court.

(2) In the case of an Indian child, if the Indian child’s tribe has
elected a permanent plan of tribal customary adoption, the court,
upon receiving the tribal customary adoption order will afford the
tribal customary adoption order full faith and credit to the same
extent that the court would afford full faith and credit to the public
acts, records, judicial proceedings, and judgments of any other
entity. Upon a determination that the tribal customary adoption
order may be afforded full faith and credit, consistent with Section
224.5, the court shall thereafter order a hearing to finalize the
adoption be set upon the filing of the adoption petition. The
prospective tribal customary adoptive parents and the child who
is the subject of the tribal customary adoption petition shall appear
before the court for the finalization hearing. The court shall
thereafter issue an order of adoption pursuant to Section 366.24.

(3) If a child who is the subject of a finalized tribal customary
adoption shows evidence of a developmental disability or mental
illness as a result of conditions existing before the tribal customary
adoption to the extent that the child cannot be relinquished to a
licensed adoption agency on the grounds that the child is considered
unadoptable, and of which condition the tribal customary adoptive
parent or parents had no knowledge or notice before the entry of
the tribal customary adoption order, a petition setting forth those
facts may be filed by the tribal customary adoptive parent or
parents with the juvenile court that granted the tribal customary
adoption petition. If these facts are proved to the satisfaction of
the juvenile court, it may make an order setting aside the tribal
customary adoption order. The set-aside petition shall be filed
within five years of the issuance of the tribal customary adoption
order. The court clerk shall immediately notify the child’s tribe
and the department in Sacramento of the petition within 60 days
after the notice of filing of the petition. The department shall file
a full report with the court and shall appear before the court for
the purpose of representing the child. Whenever a final decree of
tribal customary adoption has been vacated or set aside, the child
shall be returned to the custody of the county in which the
proceeding for tribal customary adoption was finalized. The
biological parent or parents of the child may petition for return of
custody. The disposition of the child after the court has entered an
order to set aside a tribal customary adoption shall include
consultation with the child’s tribe.

(f) At the beginning of any proceeding pursuant to this section,
if the child or the parents are not being represented by previously
retained or appointed counsel, the court shall proceed as follows:

(1) In accordance with subdivision (c) of Section 317, if a child
before the court is without counsel, the court shall appoint counsel
unless the court finds that the child would not benefit from the
appointment of counsel. The court shall state on the record its
reasons for that finding.

(2) If a parent appears without counsel and is unable to afford
counsel, the court shall appoint counsel for the parent, unless this
representation is knowingly and intelligently waived. The same
counsel shall not be appointed to represent both the child and his
or her parent. The public defender or private counsel may be
appointed as counsel for the parent.

(3) Private counsel appointed under this section shall receive a
reasonable sum for compensation and expenses, the amount of
which shall be determined by the court. The amount shall be paid
by the real parties in interest, other than the child, in any
proportions the court deems just. However, if the court finds that
any of the real parties in interest are unable to afford counsel, the
amount shall be paid out of the general fund of the county.

(g) The court may continue the proceeding for a period of time
not to exceed 30 days as necessary to appoint counsel, and to
enable counsel to become acquainted with the case.

(h) (1) At all proceedings under this section, the court shall
consider the wishes of the child and shall act in the best interests
of the child.

(2) In accordance with Section 349, the child shall be present
in court if the child or the child’s counsel so requests or the court
so orders. If the child is 10 years of age or older and is not present
at a hearing held pursuant to this section, the court shall determine
whether the minor was properly notified of his or her right to attend
the hearing and inquire as to the reason why the child is not present.

(3) (A) The testimony of the child may be taken in chambers
and outside the presence of the child’s parent or parents, if the
child’s parent or parents are represented by counsel, the counsel
is present, and any of the following circumstances exists:

(i) The court determines that testimony in chambers is necessary
to ensure truthful testimony.

(ii) The child is likely to be intimidated by a formal courtroom
setting.

(iii) The child is afraid to testify in front of his or her parent or
parents.

(B) After testimony in chambers, the parent or parents of the
child may elect to have the court reporter read back the testimony
or have the testimony summarized by counsel for the parent or
parents.

(C) The testimony of a child also may be taken in chambers and
outside the presence of the guardian or guardians of a child under
the circumstances specified in this subdivision.

(i) (1) Any order of the court permanently terminating parental
rights under this section shall be conclusive and binding upon the
child, upon the parent or parents and upon all other persons who
have been served with citation by publication or otherwise as
provided in this chapter. After making the order, the juvenile court
shall have no power to set aside, change, or modify it, except as
provided in paragraph (2), but nothing in this section shall be
construed to limit the right to appeal the order.

(2) A tribal customary adoption order evidencing that the Indian
child has been the subject of a tribal customary adoption shall be
afforded full faith and credit and shall have the same force and
effect as an order of adoption authorized by this section. The rights
and obligations of the parties as to the matters determined by the
Indian child’s tribe shall be binding on all parties. A court shall
not order compliance with the order absent a finding that the party
seeking the enforcement participated, or attempted to participate,
in good faith, in family mediation services of the court or dispute
resolution through the tribe regarding the conflict, prior to the
filing of the enforcement action.

(3) A child who has not been adopted after the passage of at
least three years from the date the court terminated parental rights
and for whom the court has determined that adoption is no longer
the permanent plan may petition the juvenile court to reinstate
parental rights pursuant to the procedure prescribed by Section
388. The child may file the petition prior to the expiration of this
three-year period if the State Department of Social Services, county
adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency that is responsible
for custody and supervision of the child as described in subdivision
(j) and the child stipulate that the child is no longer likely to be
adopted. A child over 12 years of age shall sign the petition in the
absence of a showing of good cause as to why the child could not
do so. If it appears that the best interests of the child may be
promoted by reinstatement of parental rights, the court shall order
that a hearing be held and shall give prior notice, or cause prior
notice to be given, to the social worker or probation officer and to
the child’s attorney of record, or, if there is no attorney of record
for the child, to the child, and the child’s tribe, if applicable, by
means prescribed by subdivision (c) of Section 297. The court
shall order the child or the social worker or probation officer to
give prior notice of the hearing to the child’s former parent or
parents whose parental rights were terminated in the manner
prescribed by subdivision (f) of Section 294 where the
recommendation is adoption. The juvenile court shall grant the
petition if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child
is no longer likely to be adopted and that reinstatement of parental
rights is in the child’s best interest. If the court reinstates parental
rights over a child who is under 12 years of age, the court shall
specify in writing the factual basis for its findings that it is in the
best interest of the child to reinstate parental rights. This
subdivision is intended to be retroactive and applies to any child
who is under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court at the time of
the hearing regardless of the date parental rights were terminated.

(j) If the court, by order or judgment, declares the child free
from the custody and control of both parents, or one parent if the
other does not have custody and control, or declares the child
eligible for tribal customary adoption, the court shall at the same
time order the child referred to the State Department of Social
Services, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency for
adoptive placement by the agency. However, except in the case
of a tribal customary adoption where there is no termination of
parental rights, a petition for adoption may not be granted until
the appellate rights of the natural parents have been exhausted.
The State Department of Social Services, county adoption agency,
or licensed adoption agency shall be responsible for the custody
and supervision of the child and shall be entitled to the exclusive
care and control of the child at all times until a petition for adoption
or tribal customary adoption is granted, except as specified in
subdivision (n). With the consent of the agency, the court may
appoint a guardian of the child, who shall serve until the child is
adopted.

(k) Notwithstanding any other law, the application of any person
who, as a relative caretaker or foster parent, has cared for a
dependent child for whom the court has approved a permanent
plan for adoption, or who has been freed for adoption, shall be
given preference with respect to that child over all other
applications for adoptive placement if the agency making the
placement determines that the child has substantial emotional ties
to the relative caretaker or foster parent and removal from the
relative caretaker or foster parent would be seriously detrimental
to the child’s emotional well-being.

As used in this subdivision, “preference” means that the
application shall be processed and, if satisfactory, the family study
shall be completed before the processing of the application of any
other person for the adoptive placement of the child.

(l) (1) An order by the court that a hearing pursuant to this
section be held is not appealable at any time unless all of the
following apply:

(A) A petition for extraordinary writ review was filed in a timely
manner.

(B) The petition substantively addressed the specific issues to
be challenged and supported that challenge by an adequate record.

(C) The petition for extraordinary writ review was summarily
denied or otherwise not decided on the merits.

(2) Failure to file a petition for extraordinary writ review within
the period specified by rule, to substantively address the specific
issues challenged, or to support that challenge by an adequate
record shall preclude subsequent review by appeal of the findings
and orders made pursuant to this section.

(3) The Judicial Council shall adopt rules of court, effective
January 1, 1995, to ensure all of the following:

(A) A trial court, after issuance of an order directing a hearing
pursuant to this section be held, shall advise all parties of the
requirement of filing a petition for extraordinary writ review as
set forth in this subdivision in order to preserve any right to appeal
in these issues. This notice shall be made orally to a party if the
party is present at the time of the making of the order or by
first-class mail by the clerk of the court to the last known address
of a party not present at the time of the making of the order.

(B) The prompt transmittal of the records from the trial court
to the appellate court.

(C) That adequate time requirements for counsel and court
personnel exist to implement the objective of this subdivision.

(D) That the parent or guardian, or their trial counsel or other
counsel, is charged with the responsibility of filing a petition for
extraordinary writ relief pursuant to this subdivision.

(4) The intent of this subdivision is to do both of the following:

(A) Make every reasonable attempt to achieve a substantive and
meritorious review by the appellate court within the time specified
in Sections 366.21, 366.22, and 366.25 for holding a hearing
pursuant to this section.

(B) Encourage the appellate court to determine all writ petitions
filed pursuant to this subdivision on their merits.

(5) This subdivision shall only apply to cases in which an order
to set a hearing pursuant to this section is issued on or after January
1, 1995.

(m) Except for subdivision (j), this section shall also apply to
minors adjudged wards pursuant to Section 727.31.

(n) (1) Notwithstanding Section 8704 of the Family Code or
any other law, the court, at a hearing held pursuant to this section
or anytime thereafter, may designate a current caretaker as a
prospective adoptive parent if the child has lived with the caretaker
for at least six months, the caretaker currently expresses a
commitment to adopt the child, and the caretaker has taken at least
one step to facilitate the adoption process. In determining whether
to make that designation, the court may take into consideration
whether the caretaker is listed in the preliminary assessment
prepared by the county department in accordance with subdivision
(i) of Section 366.21 as an appropriate person to be considered as
an adoptive parent for the child and the recommendation of the
State Department of Social Services, county adoption agency, or
licensed adoption agency.

(2) For purposes of this subdivision, steps to facilitate the
adoption process include, but are not limited to, the following:

(A) Applying for an adoption home study.

(B) Cooperating with an adoption home study.

(C) Being designated by the court or the adoption agency as the
adoptive family.

(D) Requesting de facto parent status.

(E) Signing an adoptive placement agreement.

(F) Engaging in discussions regarding a postadoption contact
agreement.

(G) Working to overcome any impediments that have been
identified by the State Department of Social Services, county
adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency.

(H) Attending classes required of prospective adoptive parents.

(3) Prior to a change in placement and as soon as possible after
a decision is made to remove a child from the home of a designated
prospective adoptive parent, the agency shall notify the court, the
designated prospective adoptive parent or the current caretaker, if
that caretaker would have met the threshold criteria to be
designated as a prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph
(1) on the date of service of this notice, the child’s attorney, and
the child, if the child is 10 years of age or older, of the proposal
in the manner described in Section 16010.6.

(A) Within five court days or seven calendar days, whichever
is longer, of the date of notification, the child, the child’s attorney,
or the designated prospective adoptive parent may file a petition
with the court objecting to the proposal to remove the child, or the
court, upon its own motion, may set a hearing regarding the
proposal. The court may, for good cause, extend the filing period.
A caretaker who would have met the threshold criteria to be
designated as a prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph
(1) on the date of service of the notice of proposed removal of the
child may file, together with the petition under this subparagraph,
a petition for an order designating the caretaker as a prospective
adoptive parent for purposes of this subdivision.

(B) A hearing ordered pursuant to this paragraph shall be held
as soon as possible and not later than five court days after the
petition is filed with the court or the court sets a hearing upon its
own motion, unless the court for good cause is unable to set the
matter for hearing five court days after the petition is filed, in
which case the court shall set the matter for hearing as soon as
possible. At the hearing, the court shall determine whether the
caretaker has met the threshold criteria to be designated as a
prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph (1), and whether
the proposed removal of the child from the home of the designated
prospective adoptive parent is in the child’s best interest, and the
child may not be removed from the home of the designated
prospective adoptive parent unless the court finds that removal is
in the child’s best interest. If the court determines that the caretaker
did not meet the threshold criteria to be designated as a prospective
adoptive parent on the date of service of the notice of proposed
removal of the child, the petition objecting to the proposed removal
filed by the caretaker shall be dismissed. If the caretaker was
designated as a prospective adoptive parent prior to this hearing,
the court shall inquire into any progress made by the caretaker
towards the adoption of the child since the caretaker was designated
as a prospective adoptive parent.

(C) A determination by the court that the caretaker is a
designated prospective adoptive parent pursuant to paragraph (1)
or subparagraph (B) does not make the caretaker a party to the
dependency proceeding nor does it confer on the caretaker any
standing to object to any other action of the department, county
adoption agency, or licensed adoption agency, unless the caretaker
has been declared a de facto parent by the court prior to the notice
of removal served pursuant to paragraph (3).

(D) If a petition objecting to the proposal to remove the child
is not filed, and the court, upon its own motion, does not set a
hearing, the child may be removed from the home of the designated
prospective adoptive parent without a hearing.

(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), if the State Department of
Social Services, county adoption agency, or licensed adoption
agency determines that the child must be removed from the home
of the caretaker who is or may be a designated prospective adoptive
parent immediately, due to a risk of physical or emotional harm,
the agency may remove the child from that home and is not
required to provide notice prior to the removal. However, as soon
as possible and not longer than two court days after the removal,
the agency shall notify the court, the caretaker who is or may be
a designated prospective adoptive parent, the child’s attorney, and
the child, if the child is 10 years of age or older, of the removal.
Within five court days or seven calendar days, whichever is longer,
of the date of notification of the removal, the child, the child’s
attorney, or the caretaker who is or may be a designated prospective
adoptive parent may petition for, or the court on its own motion
may set, a noticed hearing pursuant to paragraph (3). The court
may, for good cause, extend the filing period.

(5) Except as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 366.28, an
order by the court issued after a hearing pursuant to this subdivision
shall not be appealable.

(6) Nothing in this section shall preclude a county child
protective services agency from fully investigating and responding
to alleged abuse or neglect of a child pursuant to Section 11165.5
of the Penal Code.

(7) The Judicial Council shall prepare forms to facilitate the
filing of the petitions described in this subdivision, which shall
become effective on January 1, 2006.

SEC. 5.  

Section 398 is added to the Welfare and Institutions
Code, to read:

398.  

At the time a child is being considered for placement in
a foster home, the social worker shall provide to the foster parents
all of the following:

(a) Notification that he or she has the right to be present at the
dispositional hearing and at any hearing thereafter at which the
status of the child is at issue.

(b) Information regarding de facto parent status and the manner
in which a foster parent can apply to the juvenile court to become
a de facto parent.

(c) Notification that if the child reenters foster care, the foster
parents of the child have the right to be provided written notice
from the court if the child, after being reunified with his or her
parents, is returned to the court for further dependency proceedings.

SEC. 6.  

To the extent that this act has an overall effect of
increasing the costs already borne by a local agency for programs
or levels of service mandated by the 2011 Realignment Legislation
within the meaning of Section 36 of Article XIII of the California
Constitution, it shall apply to local agencies only to the extent that
the state provides annual funding for the cost increase. Any new
program or higher level of service provided by a local agency
pursuant to this act above the level for which funding has been
provided shall not require a subvention of funds by the state nor
otherwise be subject to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution.

end delete