BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session AB 2590 (Weber) - Sentencing: restorative justice ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: May 19, 2016 |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 5 - 2 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: No | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: August 11, 2016 |Consultant: Jolie Onodera | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- *********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM - SUSPENSE FILE *********** The following information is revised to reflect amendments adopted by the committee on August 11, 2016 Bill Summary: AB 2590 would revise existing law declaring "the purpose of imprisonment for crime is punishment" to instead declare that "the purpose of sentencing is public safety achieved through punishment, rehabilitation, and restorative justice." This bill would revise existing law declaring that programs should be available to prepare nonviolent felony offenders for reentry to instead declare that programs should be available for eligible offenders to prepare them for successful reentry into the community. AB 2590 (Weber) Page 1 of ? Fiscal Impact: CDCR : No direct state costs. Potential major future cost pressure (General Fund) to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to develop and implement policies and programs, allowing eligible offenders (potentially extending beyond the existing reference to nonviolent felony offenders) the opportunity to enroll in programs that promote successful reentry into the community. Restorative justice : Potential major future cost pressure (General Fund/Local Funds) to develop and implement strategies to provide alternatives to punitive justice through a victim-centered approach, including cooperative agreements between agencies, facilitators over planning sessions, and the provision of services both before and after incarceration. The revision to the overarching purpose of sentencing to include restorative justice, which is undefined in the bill, could potentially result in substantial future investments to various state and local agencies to develop and implement. Some states have even created a separate agency to oversee the restorative justice strategy and provide the services. Long-term impacts : Potential future cost savings to the courts, state/local law enforcement agencies and facilities through reduced recidivism to the extent "restorative justice" becomes successfully integrated into the criminal justice system. Author Amendments: Replace the word "accountability" with "punishment". Strike the reference to "all offenders" and replace with "eligible offenders". Make other technical and conforming changes. Add coauthors. -- END -- AB 2590 (Weber) Page 2 of ?