BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 2613
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB
2613 (Achadjian)
As Amended May 2, 2016
Majority vote
------------------------------------------------------------------
|Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Local |9-0 |Eggman, Waldron, | |
|Government | |Alejo, Bonilla, Chiu, | |
| | |Cooley, | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |Beth Gaines, Gordon, | |
| | |Linder | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Authorizes a special district, subject to specified
conditions, to replace a required annual audit with an annual
financial compilation and a review of the internal control
procedures of the special district. Specifically, this bill:
1)Authorizes a special district until January 1, 2027, by annual
unanimous request of the governing board of the special
AB 2613
Page 2
district and with annual unanimous approval of the county
board of supervisors, to replace a required annual audit with
an annual financial compilation and a review of the internal
control procedures of the special district performed by the
county auditor in accordance with professional standards, if
all of the following conditions are met:
a) All of the special district revenues and expenditures
are transacted through the county's financial system;
b) The special district's annual revenues do not exceed
$150,000; and,
c) The special district pays for any costs incurred by the
county auditor in performing the financial compilation and
evaluation of the internal control procedures.
2)Prohibits a special district from replacing an annual audit
with an annual financial compilation and annual review of the
internal control procedures pursuant to 1) above, for more
than five consecutive years, after which a special district
must comply with an annual audit.
3)Requires the special district to pay for costs incurred by the
county auditor as a charge against any unencumbered funds of
the special district available for that purpose.
EXISTING LAW:
1)Requires a county auditor to either make or contract with a
certified public accountant to make an annual audit of the
accounts and records of every special purpose district within
AB 2613
Page 3
the county for which an audit by a certified public accountant
or public accountant is not otherwise provided. Requires the
minimum requirements of the audit to be prescribed by the
Controller and to conform to generally accepted auditing
standards.
2)Requires the report, where an audit of a special districts
accounts and records is made by a certified public accountant,
to be filed with the Controller and with the county auditor in
which the special district is located within 12 months of the
end of the year or years under examination.
3)Authorizes a special district, by unanimous request of the
governing board of the special district, and unanimous
approval of the board of supervisors, to replace the required
annual audit with one of the following:
a) A biennial audit covering a two-year period;
b) An audit covering a five-year period, if the district's
annual budget does not exceed an amount specified by the
board of supervisors;
c) An audit conducted at specific intervals, as recommended
by the county auditor, completed at least once every five
years; or,
d) A financial review, if the following conditions are met:
i) All of the special district revenues and
expenditures are transacted through the county's
financial system; and,
AB 2613
Page 4
ii) The special district's annual revenues do not exceed
$150,000.
4)Authorizes a dependent special district, if the board of
supervisors is the governing board of the special district and
with unanimous approval, to replace the required annual audit
with a financial review done in accordance with appropriate
professional standards as determined by the county auditor, if
the conditions in 3) d) above, are met.
5)States that a special district shall be exempt from the
requirements of an annual audit, if the financial statements
are audited by the Controller to satisfy federal audit
requirements.
6)Requires the officer of each local agency, city, county, and
district, who has charge of the financial records to furnish
to the Controller a report of all the financial transactions
of the local agency during the next preceding fiscal year.
7)Requires the California State Controller, on or before January
1, 2015, to develop internal control guidelines applicable to
each local agency to prevent and detect financial errors and
fraud.
FISCAL EFFECT: None
COMMENTS:
1)Background. Pursuant to existing law, special districts are
AB 2613
Page 5
required to submit an annual Financial Transactions Report, a
Compensation Report, and an annual audit to the Controller.
County auditors are required to annually audit each special
district or contract with a certified public accountant or
public accountant for this work. Existing law requires that
the audit conforms to standards established by the Controller
and to generally accepted auditing standards. Special
districts must pay for the annual audit. Due to the costs of
annual audits, AB 2510 (La Malfa), Chapter 244, Statues of
2008, expanded the options available to special districts to
satisfy the annual audit requirement with less formal
financial reviews and less frequent audits. Proponents of
this bill provided several examples of the percentage of an
annual budget that is expended to comply with audit
requirements in existing law: Tucker Oakes Water District
16%, Allegheny County Water District 10%, Bayshore Sanitary
District 8%, Mokelumne Cemetery District 9%, and Beaumont
Library District 8%.
Due to the changes made by AB 2510, special districts that
meet specified conditions have several options to replace the
required annual audit. Upon the unanimous request of a
special district's governing board and the unanimous approval
of the county board of supervisors, a required annual audit
may be replaced by a biennial audit, a five-year audit (if the
district's revenues do not exceed a specified amount by the
board of supervisors), or an audit conducted at specific
intervals, as recommended by the county auditor.
Additionally, if a special district's transactions go through
the county's financial system and the district's annual
revenues are less than $150,000, a special district may
replace the required annual audit with a financial review.
2)Bill Summary. This bill provides an additional option for
special districts in meeting the annual audit requirement in
existing law. This bill authorizes a special district until
January 1, 2027, by unanimous request of their governing body
AB 2613
Page 6
and with the unanimous approval of the county board of
supervisors, to replace the required annual audit with an
annual financial compilation and review of the internal
control procedures of the district in accordance with
professional standards performed by the county auditor, if the
district's transactions go through the county's financial
system and the district's annual revenues are less than
$150,000. This bill authorizes a special district to perform
an annual financial compilation and review of the internal
control procedures for up to five consecutive years at which
point they would need to return to an annual audit. This bill
is sponsored by the California Special Districts Association.
3)Author's Statement. According to the author, "AB 2613 will
allow special districts to carry out a financial compilation
and review of internal control and procedures in lieu of an
annual audit when revenues do not exceed $150,000. This bill
will give special districts in good standing the opportunity
to utilize a less costly alternative to the regular audit or
financial review, while continuing to maintain the proper
financial oversight and accountability of these government
entities."
4)Audit, Financial Review, and Financial Compilation. There are
key differences between an audit, financial review and
financial compilation and the scope, activity, and assurance
of financial stability provided by each. An audit is the
highest level of financial oversight that can be provided.
Its purpose is to provide financial statement users with an
opinion by the auditor on whether the financial statements are
prepared in accordance with the proper financial reporting
framework. The auditor evaluates the internal control system
and obtains reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free from misstatement and free from error or
fraud.
AB 2613
Page 7
A financial review provides less assurance than an audit
because there is only limited assurance that there are no
material modifications that should be made to the financial
statements for them to be in conformity with the financial
reporting framework. The auditor does not perform any audit
procedures in a financial review. A financial compilation
provides less assurance than an audit or financial review
because the auditor's report will not express an opinion or
provide any assurance regarding the financial statements. The
objective of a financial compilation is to present the
financial information.
5)Policy Considerations. The Legislature may wish to take into
consideration some of the inherent differences between a
financial review and a financial compilation. Current law
authorizes specified districts to replace the annual audit
with a financial review. A financial review is second to an
audit and still requires an auditor or accountant to perform
analytical procedures and inquiries. A financial compilation
requires no analytical procedures and inquiries, and requires
the auditor to assist in the presentation of a financial
statement. The Legislature may wish to consider if this is an
appropriate level of review despite the more limited number of
special districts that would be authorized to utilize this
option.
6)Arguments in Support. The California Special District
Association argues, "For some special districts, the cost of
the audits has surpassed 33% of their entire operating budget
for the year. Special districts are authorized under existing
law to utilize a biennial audit, or a financial review if they
meet similar thresholds, but even those cost saving
alternatives remain too costly for many of the smallest
district. By allowing qualified special districts to submit a
financial compilation instead of an audit, district's limited
funds can now be directed towards providing intended
AB 2613
Page 8
services."
7)Arguments in Opposition. None on file.
Analysis Prepared by:
Misa Lennox / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 FN:
0002842