BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER Senator Fran Pavley, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 2616 Hearing Date: June 28, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Burke | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Version: |May 31, 2016 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|William Craven | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: California Coastal Commission: environmental justice BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW 1. Pursuant to the Coastal Act: a) Establishes the Commission in the Natural Resources Agency and requires the Commission to consist of 15 members (3 non-voting and 12 voting). b) Requires the membership of the Commission include six members of the public at large and six from local governments representatives from six coastal regions. c) Provides that the Governor, the Speaker of the Assembly, and Senate Rules Committee each appoint four of the members. d) Requires the Governor, the Senate Committee on Rules, and the Speaker of the Assembly to make good faith efforts to assure that their appointments, as a whole, reflect, to the greatest extent feasible, the economic, social, and geographic diversity of the state. e) Requires a person planning to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone to obtain a coastal development permit (CDP) from the Commission or local government enforcing a Local Coastal Program (LCP). f) Defines "development" to mean, among other things, the AB 2616 (Burke) Page 2 of ? placement or erection of any solid material or structure on land or in water. "Structure" includes, but is not limited to, any building, road, pipe, flume, conduit, siphon, aqueduct, telephone line, and electrical power transmission and distribution line. g) Defines the "coastal zone" as the land and water area of the State of California from the Oregon border to the border of the Republic of Mexico, extending seaward to the state's outer limit of jurisdiction, including all offshore islands, and extending inland generally 1,000 yards from the mean high tide line of the sea. In significant coastal estuarine, habitat, and recreational areas, the coastal zone extends inland to the first major ridgeline paralleling the sea or five miles from the mean high tide line of the sea, whichever is less. In developed urban areas, the zone generally extends inland less than 1,000 yards. The coastal zone does not include the area of jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, nor any area contiguous thereto, including any river, stream, tributary, creek, or flood control or drainage channel flowing into such area. 2) The Government Code defines "environmental justice" to mean the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. PROPOSED LAW This bill would add three new members to the Commission to represent environmental justice communities. It also allows, but does not require, the Commission, when acting on a coastal development permit to consider environmental justice and the equitable distribution of environmental benefits throughout the state. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT According to the author, the bill gives a voice to the environmental justice community by adding three new environmental justice members and provides the Commission the ability to consider environmental justice issues when making decisions regarding the California coast. She believes that the bill is consistent with a recent law that added additional environmental justice representatives to the California Air AB 2616 (Burke) Page 3 of ? Resources Control Board and a pending proposal to add representation to the South Coast Air Quality Management Board. An environmental/social justice coalition has adopted a support if amended position that seeks to strengthen the civil rights language in the bill but expressed a lack of support over the proposal to add three new members. It would like a public process to ensure that the environmental justice appointees represent impacted communities. It is also concerned by the recent action of the Coastal Commission to suggest an amendment to this bill that the three new members are elected officials-and not public members--who may or may not adequately represent disadvantaged communities. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION Opposition arguments raise several considerations: (1) Expanding the size of the commission may or may not result in improved consideration of environmental justice considerations; (2) that the 12-member commission currently comprises 4 people of color, two LGBT members, and a majority of 7 women, which suggests that representatives of underserved communities are currently serving. As an alternative to three new members, the California State Association of Counties suggests one environmental justice advisory member. The County of Santa Barbara believes that environmental justice should be handled by the commission currently and does not support adding new commissioners for the specific purposes that the Commission should be handling already. COMMENTS 1. Environmental Justice. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, approximately 8 million Californians (21%) live in zip codes that are considered "highly impacted" by environmental, public health, and socioeconomic stressors. Nearly half of all Californians live within six miles of a facility that is a significant greenhouse gas emitter (46%), and they are disproportionately people of color (62%). Throughout California, people of color face a 50% higher risk of cancer from ambient concentrations of air pollutants listed under the AB 2616 (Burke) Page 4 of ? Clean Air Act. These impacts affect all Californians. The Air Resources Board (ARB) estimates that air pollution exposure accounts for 19,000 premature deaths, 280,000 cases of asthma, and 1.9 million lost work days every year. 2. Discussions with the author and the Committee resulted in a potential mechanism to achieve environmental justice representation within the existing structure of 12 members as well as to strengthen the environmental justice language in the bill: Each of the appointing authorities (Speaker, Senate Rules, Governor) has 4 appointees consisting of two public appointments and two appointees from local government. The amendment would provide that one of the four, from each of the appointing authorities, must represent disadvantaged communities. The statutory balance of 6 public members and 6 local government members would not be altered. The appointing authorities would have to decide which of their appointees would represent disadvantaged communities and the timing of that appointment. The amendment would not require that any current commissioners be removed. (Amendment 1) The Committee recommends that the environmental justice members actually reside in the communities they represent on the commission, and have a demonstrated commitment to environmental justice. (Amendment 2) Additionally, the Committee and the author have discussed adding a cross-reference from the Civil Rights Act (Government Code section 11135(a) or another appropriate cross-reference) so that the statutory link between environmental justice and the Coastal Act is made crystal clear and would therefore become an obligation of all commissioners to uphold. (Amendment 3). It should also be stated that these amendments do not affect the discretion of an appointing authority to increase the representation from disadvantaged communities or from communities historically disproportionately affected by environmental impacts. AB 2616 (Burke) Page 5 of ? SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS AMENDMENT 1 Provide that one of the four appointees by each appointing authority represents disadvantaged communities on a selection schedule determined by each appointing authority. AMENDMENT 2 Provide that each appointee pursuant to Amendment 1 reside in a disadvantaged community or a community historically disproportionately affected by environmental impacts, and that each appointee has demonstrated a commitment to environmental justice. AMENDMENT 3 Add appropriate cross-reference to the Civil Rights Act. SUPPORT All are support if amended: Audubon California California Coastal Commission California Coastal Protection Network California League of Conservation Voters Courage Campaign Environment California Sierra Club California Trust for Public Land OPPOSITION California State Association of Counties Committee for Green Foothills County of Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper -- END -- AB 2616 (Burke) Page 6 of ?