BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2617


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 11, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          2617 (Mayes) - As Amended April 14, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Water, Parks and Wildlife      |Vote:|15 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to  
          develop a water efficiency cost-benefit analysis draft report by  
          December 1, 2017, solicit comments, and finalize the report by  
          July 1, 2018.  Specifically, this bill: 








                                                                    AB 2617


                                                                    Page  2







          1)Requires CEC to consult with experts at the University of  
            California, California State University, local water districts  
            and others.  Requires CEC to develop the report in cooperation  
            with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the  
            Department of Water Resources (DWR).


          2)Requires the CEC to issue a final report by July 1, 2018, that  
            includes all of the following:


             a)   Identification of the most cost-effective incentives for  
               indoor and outdoor water efficiency measures, measured by  
               the amount of water use reduction per dollar spent.


             b)   Recommendations to public entities for prioritizing the  
               most cost-effective measures.


             c)   Analysis of any unintended adverse environmental impacts  
               from the water efficiency measures.  Unintended adverse  
               environmental impacts is defined to include, but are not  
               limited to, impacts on climate change, net effect on carbon  
               sequestration, increased erosion, and impacts to stormwater  
               runoff.


             d)   Projected benefits of recommended voluntary water  
               efficiency measures.


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)Increased costs of $400,000 per year over a two-year period  
            for CEC to hire additional staff or issue contracts to prepare  








                                                                    AB 2617


                                                                    Page  3





            the report (GF or special fund).


          2)Increased costs for SWRCB to participate in the evaluations of  
            water efficiency measures of approximately $70,000 per year.


          3)Minor, absorbable costs for DWR to participate in the  
            evaluations.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  According to the author, while millions of dollars  
            have been spent on water efficiency incentives in response to  
            California's drought, there is not an authoritative  
            independent report comparing the relative costs and benefits  
            of different incentive options.  The author intends the report  
            required by this bill to serve as a guide to local water  
            retailers as they evaluate which incentives lead to greater  
            increases in water efficiency at the lowest possible cost.  


          2)Water Efficiency and the Drought.  Executive Order B-29-15  
            from April of 2015 directed: 1) the CEC to fund emerging water  
            saving technologies; 2) the SWRCB to impose a 25%  reduction  
            in urban water use over 2013 levels;  and 3) DWR to update the  
            state model water efficient landscape ordinance to  
            specifically increase water efficiency through more efficient  
            irrigation standards. 


            Technology in landscape irrigation has advanced in recent  
            years with numerous new efficient irrigation controls and  
            moisture sensing devices coming to the market.  The cost of  
            water has increased significantly in the past decade and is  
            projected to increase annually at a rate of 4% or higher.   
            Consumers appear to be responding to these conditions as it  








                                                                    AB 2617


                                                                    Page  4





            has been reported that one of the largest areas of sales  
            growth at home improvement stores has been efficient landscape  
            irrigation equipment.  


            Water efficiency programs hold the potential to produce  
            similar significant benefits.  With nearly half of all urban  
            water use occurring outdoors there is a clear need and  
            opportunity to explore ways to improve landscape irrigation.  


          3)Related Legislation.  AB 2525 (Holden) requires DWR to create  
            a program to encourage local economic incentives that promote  
            water efficient landscapes.  This bill will be heard today in  
            this Committee.


            AB 1928 (Campos) requires CEC to adopt landscape irrigation  
            equipment performance standards and labeling requirements.    
            This bill is on this Committee's Suspense File.



          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081