BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2618| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 2618 Author: Nazarian (D) Amended: 8/19/16 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 6-1, 6/15/16 AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Pavley NOES: Moorlach ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-1, 5/12/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Community facilities districts: powers SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill allows Mello-Roos community facilities districts to finance improvements to bring real property into compliance with seismic safety standards or regulations. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/19/16 avoid a potential chaptering out conflict with AB 2693 (Dababneh, 2016) by incorporating recent amendments to AB 2693 into the double-jointing language added to this bill. Senate Floor Amendments of 8/16/16 avoid a potential chaptering out problem with AB 2693 (Dababneh, 2016). ANALYSIS: Existing law establishes two distinct statutory frameworks under which local governments can implement and administer property assessed clean energy (PACE) loan programs that rely either on voluntary contractual assessments or parcel AB 2618 Page 2 taxes for repayment of the loans. This bill adds seismic improvements, as specified, to the types of improvements that can be financed on publicly or privately owned property by a community facilities district (CFD) that is formed through an alternative process that allows property owners to voluntarily annex their property into the CFD. Background PACE financing programs allow local governments to offer loans to private property owners to cover the initial costs of renewable energy, energy efficiency, water efficiency, and other improvements to private property that offer public benefits. Property owners repay the loans through voluntary assessments or parcel taxes, which are secured by priority liens and appear annually on property tax bills until the loans are repaid. State law establishes two distinct statutory frameworks under which local governments can implement and administer PACE loan programs that rely on voluntary contractual assessments or parcel taxes for repayment of the loans. Voluntary contractual assessment PACE financing. A benefit assessment is an involuntary charge that property owners pay for a public improvement or service that provides a special benefit to their property. As an alternative to benefit assessments, and only with the free and willing consent of affected property owners, state law lets public agencies use voluntary contractual assessments to finance: Renewable energy sources or energy efficiency improvements that are permanently fixed to real property (AB 811, Levine, Chapter 159, Statutes of 2008). AB 2618 Page 3 Water efficiency improvements that are permanently fixed to real property (AB 474, Blumenfield, Chapter 444, Statutes of 2009). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure (SB 1340, Kehoe, Chapter 649, Statutes of 2010). Seismic strengthening improvements (AB 184, Swanson, Chapter 28, Statutes of 2011). Mello-Roos parcel tax PACE financing. The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act allows counties, cities, special districts, and school districts to levy special taxes (parcel taxes) to finance a wide variety of public works, including parks, recreation centers, schools, libraries, child care facilities, and utility infrastructure. A Mello-Roos CFD issues bonds against these special taxes to finance the public works projects. In addition to financing public works, state law also allows CFDs to finance improvements to private property that bring the property into compliance with seismic safety standards or regulations. State law establishes an alternative process by which a local government can form a CFD to finance only energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy improvements that are affixed to or on real property and in buildings, whether the real property or buildings are privately or publicly owned (SB 555, Hancock, Chapter 493, Statutes of 2011). Under the alternative formation process, a CFD can initially consist solely of territory proposed for future annexation to the CFD, with the condition that a parcel or parcels within that territory may be annexed to the CFD and subjected to the special tax only with the unanimous approval of the parcel owner or owners at the time of annexation. In 2010, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees the nation's largest mortgage finance companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, raised concerns that residential PACE financing could pose a risk for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, because PACE loans are a first-priority lien in the case of foreclosure and AB 2618 Page 4 outstanding PACE assessments would be paid before mortgage obligations. As a result, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stated that they would no longer purchase mortgage loans secured by properties with outstanding PACE loans. Unlike the statutes allowing local government to offer PACE loans that are secured with voluntary contractual assessments, which can be used to finance seismic improvements to private property, the Mello-Roos Act's alternative process for allowing parcels to annex into a CFD and be subject to a voluntary parcel tax can only be used to finance energy efficiency, water conservation, and renewable energy improvements. Some advocates for PACE financing programs want the Legislature to allow local governments to use the Mello-Roos PACE financing framework to provide loans for improvements to private property that bring the property into compliance with seismic safety standards or regulations. Comments 1)Purpose of the bill. Millions of California's residents live in close proximity to some of the most active earthquake faults in the United States. To save lives and improve the resiliency of their communities, many local governments are requiring property owners to make seismic strengthening retrofits to structures that are likely to suffer severe damage in a strong earthquake, including "soft first-story" buildings and concrete structures built before the 1980s. Some communities have adopted financing programs based on the voluntary contractual assessment model authorized by the 2011 Swanson bill. To make more seismic retrofit financing options available to local governments and property owners, AB 2618 adds seismic safety improvements to the types of projects that can be financed by annexing a parcel to a CFD that imposes a parcel tax to repay the loan. With communities across California passing ordinances requiring seismic retrofits, it is essential the property owners have options when considering how to finance these improvements. Expanding the Mello-Roos parcel tax PACE statutes to cover seismic improvements will AB 2618 Page 5 make this financing option available to more property owners across the state while making the two state-authorized PACE models more consistent with each other. 2)Premature? Despite the best efforts of the California Legislature and local governments to support the development and implementation of innovative PACE financing programs, the programs still raise some questions that have yet to be resolved. For example, federal officials' ongoing concerns about the priority of PACE financing liens raise concerns about the effect of PACE financing on residential mortgages. Some real estate finance stakeholders and public officials raise concerns about inadequate disclosure provided to consumers by PACE financing providers. Additionally, the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority is still in the process of developing criteria for comparative assessment of energy efficiency financing programs. It may be premature to expand the allowable uses of PACE financing before some of these outstanding concerns have been resolved and a comparative assessment of PACE financing's effectiveness has been conducted. 3)Are seismic improvements different? Despite the concerns that federal regulators generally raise about the interactions between residential mortgages and priority PACE liens, using PACE financing for seismic improvements may be different. Unlike the installation of photovoltaic panels or low-flow plumbing fixtures, seismic improvements that are paid for with PACE loans make it less likely that the real property that is being improved will be damaged or destroyed in an earthquake. As a result, the improvements may directly benefit insurance providers by reducing claims and mortgage lenders by helping to protect the real property that serves as security for the mortgage. Concerns about the priority of PACE liens on residential property may be less justified when PACE financing is used to pay for seismic strengthening improvements. AB 2618 Page 6 FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified8/17/16) Ygrene Energy Fund OPPOSITION: (Verified8/17/16) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-1, 5/12/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon NOES: Travis Allen NO VOTE RECORDED: Burke, Jones-Sawyer Prepared by:Brian Weinberger / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119 8/22/16 23:05:49 **** END **** AB 2618 Page 7