BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2622 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 18, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 2622 (Nazarian) - As Amended April 26, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Revenue and Taxation |Vote:|5 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: Yes SUMMARY: This bill extends the Centralized Fleet Calculation Program (Program) for statewide assessment of certificated aircraft for property tax purposes until fiscal year (FY) 2019-20, and makes assorted technical changes to the administration of the Program. Specifically, this bill: 1)Extends, until FY 2019-20, the application of the current assessment methodology for the fair market value (FMV) of certificated aircraft owned by commercial air carriers for property tax purposes and the rebuttable presumption that the AB 2622 Page 2 pre-allocated FMV of certificated aircraft, as calculated, is correct. 2)Extends, until December 31, 2019, the application of the following provisions of law that otherwise are scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2016: a) A commercial air carrier must file one annual property statement with a designated "lead" county, as provided; and, b) The procedure for selecting a lead county to calculate an airline's fleet value and a coordinated multi-county audit team to perform mandatory audits of commercial air carriers. 3)States that it is the intent of the Legislature to determine the most appropriate method of calculating the assessed value of certified aircraft over a 365-day period. 4)Requires, on or before March 1, 2017, the Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association to do the following: a) Designate two contacts in each lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier to address reporting and data issues; and, b) Establish best practices for the effective administration of the lead county system, audit process, and methods to evaluate converted freighters. AB 2622 Page 3 5)Requires the lead county assessor's office to transmit the property statement received from a commercial air carrier to the assessor of each county in which the carrier's personal property is located or has acquired situs. 6)Requires a county assessor that receives a property statement from the lead county to first direct questions to the lead county assessor's office, and only question the commercial air carrier if the lead county assessor's office is unable to provide the answer. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown fiscal effect. Absent a codified methodology, there can be no assurance that the values determined by individual county assessors would be the same, higher, or lower than they are under the current methodology. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, by extending the sunset date for the assessment of certified aircraft, AB 2622 continues to allow assessors to carry out their mandated responsibility to fairly assess all taxable property, within their jurisdiction, in an efficient manner. 2)Background. Prior to 1999, the state did not have a single or specific assessment methodology for valuing certificated commercial aircraft. Valuation was left to each county assessor, leading to significant problems and conflicts over inconsistent valuations, property tax apportionment, and administrative cost and complexity. In 1998, a group of AB 2622 Page 4 counties and airline industry representatives agreed to dispose of outstanding litigation and appeals over the valuation of certificated aircraft and create a new assessment methodology. That methodology was further refined by county assessors and industry representatives in 2005, resulting in the current method for valuing aircraft. In addition to specifying the component metrics used to value fleets, the methodology prescribes procedures for designating a lead county assessor's office for each commercial air carrier operating in California, allowing an airline to file one property statement with the lead county, and prescribing a centralized audit process. The lead county is designated by Aircraft Advisory Subcommittee of the California Assessors' Association. The lead county calculates the fleet value of the airlines certificated aircraft and transmits the valuation to other counties. Those counties then determine their allocated portions of the fleet value based on physical presence. Unless the existing methodology for valuing aircraft is extended, both the assessors and airlines will have to deal with multiple tax returns reporting the same information, multiple audits and multiple county assessment appeals. Furthermore, assessors would be able to use any valid method to determine FMV, such as, for example, cost, income, comparable sales, and published market value guides. 3)Representative period. A key variable in the calculation of commercial aircraft property tax is the "representative period." This is the time period that is used to estimate the frequency and amount of time that an air carrier's aircraft makes contact and maintains situs within a county. The purpose of the representative period is to obtain air carrier operational data that can reasonably be expected to reflect the average activity of the carrier for the ensuring tax year. AB 2622 Page 5 Under current law, the representative period is determined by the BOE on or before January 1 of each year, upon consultation with the assessors of counties where air carriers' aircraft make regular physical contact. January 1 is also the lien date by which the assessor establishes the assessed value and owner of property for tax purposes. Over the last 20 years, the representative period selected has most often been the first or second week of January following the lien date. In 2013, at the request of the California Assessors Association, the BOE commenced an interested parties process on this issue. The key stakeholders argued the following: a) The airline industry contended that the representative period should be as close to the lien date as possible to ensure that information reported by airlines will most accurately reflect the activity of assessed aircraft. b) Assessors contended that many other states use the preceding 12 months prior to the lien date as a representative period. Moreover, a full year representative period better reflects the true value of the aircraft. 1)Committee Amendments. When the concept of the representative period was established in 1968, technological limitations provided that utilizing an entire year's past flight activity would be too burdensome. However, the FAA now provides records of all flight data on its public Web site that may be used to derive a more accurate representative period, and thus, more accurate assessment of aircraft. However, questions about this data set, such as how it could be used by assessors and the industry and how FAA can guarantee its availability AB 2622 Page 6 into the future, remain unanswered. As these issues get worked out between stakeholders, the Committee recommends that this bill be amended to require BOE to choose a representative period that incorporates a week, or group of weeks in January, as is currently common practice, in addition to a week, or group of weeks, in July. Analysis Prepared by:Luke Reidenbach / APPR. / (916) 319-2081