BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2653 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 11, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 2653 (Eduardo Garcia) - As Amended April 27, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Natural Resources |Vote:|9 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires each state agency that receives AB 32 cap-and-trade revenues (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds) to include the following additional elements in their existing report to the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA): 1) The number of business entities receiving financial assistance or entering into contracts paid using Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds (GGRF). AB 2653 Page 2 2) The amount of other public or private moneys leveraged when business entities received the GGRF assistance. 3) The geographic location, industry sector, and number of employees of the business entity. 4) The number of jobs created by the business entities, including wage levels. 5) Actions and outcomes taken to assist residents of disadvantaged communities and other target populations, as identified by the CalEPA Secretary, with the businesses, employment, and training opportunities through the activities funded by the GGRF or other funds as specified. This bill allows the CalEPA Secretary to include this information in its state agency GHG emission reduction report card (report card) and applies to awards made by agencies after February 1, 2017. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Unknown increased costs for all state agencies receiving GGRF, potentially in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (GGRF). There are approximately 47 state agency programs receiving GGRF. 2)Unknown increased costs, potentially in the million dollar range, for CalEPA to reconfigure its website to accommodate the new data. AB 2653 Page 3 3)Increased ongoing costs for ARB, as the GGRF administrator, of between $145,000 and $865,000 (GGRF) depending on how the requirement is interpreted. The upper range assumes data will be reported for each business entity receiving GGRF; the lower range assumes reporting on aggregate business data. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, as California continues its important work to reduce GHG emissions, state agencies have demonstrated great creativity in developing programs that provide co-benefits that help businesses and communities choose more sustainable actions. This bill will ensure co-benefits are tracked as the state transforms to a lower carbon economy. 2)Report Card. CalEPA is required to annually compile and organize the information submitted by state agencies into a clear, standardized format and provide the information on its website as a "state agency GHG emission reduction report card" (report card). This bill allows CalEPA to include the newly required data in its annual report card. 3)Background. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) requires ARB to adopt a statewide GHG emissions limit equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020 and adopt regulations, including market-based compliance mechanisms, to achieve maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reductions. As part of the implementation of AB 32 market-based compliance AB 2653 Page 4 measures, ARB adopted a cap-and-trade program that caps the allowable statewide emissions and provides for the auctioning of emission credits, the proceeds of which are quarterly deposited into the GGRF available for appropriation by the Legislature. The 2014-15 Budget Act allocated cap-and-trade revenues for the 2014-15 fiscal year and established a long-term plan for the allocation of cap-and-trade revenues beginning in fiscal year 2015-16. The Budget continuously appropriates 35% of cap-and-trade funds for investments in transit, affordable housing, and sustainable communities. Twenty-five percent of the revenues are continuously appropriated to continue the construction of high-speed rail. The remaining 40% are to be appropriated annually by the Legislature for investments in programs that include low-carbon transportation, energy efficiency and renewable energy, and natural resources and waste diversion. An expenditure plan for the 40% was not included in the 2015-16 Budget Act, with the exception of $227 million appropriated to continue funding for specified existing programs. The remaining 2015-16 revenues, along with 2016-17 revenues totaling $3.1billion, are available for appropriation this year. 4)Disadvantaged Communities. SB 535 (De León), Chapter 830, Statutes of 2012, requires no less than 10% of cap-and-trade revenues fund projects located within disadvantaged communities, and that 25% of available revenues fund projects that benefit those communities. AB 2653 Page 5 In October 2014, CalEPA released its list of disadvantaged communities for the purpose of SB 535. CalEPA relied on CalEnviroScreen to identify the areas disproportionately burdened by and vulnerable to multiple sources of pollution. CalEnviroScreen is a tool that assess all census tracts in California to identify the areas disproportionally affected and vulnerable to multiple sources of pollution. Areas (census tracts) identified as disadvantaged for SB 535's purposes by CalEnviroScreen include: the majority of the San Joaquin Valley; much of Los Angeles and the Inland Empire; pockets of other communities near ports, freeways, and major industrial facilities such as refineries and power plants; and large swaths of the Coachella Valley, Imperial Valley and Mojave Desert. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081