BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 2664


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          2664 (Irwin)


          As Amended  April 26, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Higher          |12-1 |Medina, Baker, Bloom, |Linder              |
          |Education       |     |Chávez, Irwin,        |                    |
          |                |     |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, |                    |
          |                |     |Low, Olsen, Santiago, |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Williams       |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Jobs            |9-0  |Eduardo Garcia, Kim,  |                    |
          |                |     |Achadjian, Brough,    |                    |
          |                |     |Brown, Chau, Chu,     |                    |
          |                |     |Gipson, Irwin         |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |
          |                |     |Garcia, Roger         |                    |
          |                |     |Hernández, Holden,    |                    |








                                                                    AB 2664


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Jones, Obernolte,     |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Santiago,      |                    |
          |                |     |Wagner, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Requires the University of California (UC), subject to  
          appropriation by the Legislature, to fund innovation and  
          entrepreneurship programs at each UC campus and at the Lawrence  
          Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and in other areas of the  
          state that may benefit from these programs.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Establishes the Donahoe Higher Education, setting forth the  
            mission of the UC (Education Code (EC) Section 66010, et  
            seq.).


          2)Grants the UC Regents regulatory authority over the UC (EC  
            Section 92440, et seq.).


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, General Fund cost pressure, at least in the low tens  
          of millions of dollars to fund activities at 10 UC campuses and  
          the LBNL, and potentially other areas of the state.  A prior  
          version of this bill included at $66 million General Fund  
          appropriation, to be available in equal increments over three  
          fiscal years, equivalent to $2 million per year to each of the  
          11 UC sites.


          COMMENTS:  Background.  As the research arm of the state, the UC  
          has driven innovation and economic growth.  According to the UC,  








                                                                    AB 2664


                                                                    Page  3





          it is now the world's academic leader in the number or research  
          inventions, with 1,700 reported in 2014.  The UC continues to be  
          the launching platform for a numerous startup companies that  
          stimulate the economic and job growth in California.


          The state, in 2000, created the California Institutes for  
          Science and Innovation (Cal-ISIs) through the budget and  
          legislation (AB 2883, (Villaraigosa), Chapter 79, Statutes of  
          2000) to speed up business growth in the state, develop research  
          and innovations to meet California's needs, and train future  
          scientists.


          The state provided start-up funds of $400 million for the  
          Cal-ISIs and the UC provide a 2-to-1 match from a combination of  
          business and federal sources.  The state continues to reap the  
          benefits of its original investment.  


          What is needed for continued growth?  According to the UC,  
          specific investments are needed so that the pace can be  
          maintained to keep up with the demand for innovation and  
          entrepreneurial infrastructure, resources, and support programs.  
           The UC contends that the investments will leverage UC research  
          in two ways:  1) provide researchers with the necessary tools to  
          turn their ideas into job-providing companies; and, 2) organize  
          research systemwide in order to address the various challenges  
          facing California.


          Expanding the infrastructure for UC innovation and  
          entrepreneurship to create innovation and economic development  
          in the surrounding communities of UC campuses and across  
          California will not happen overnight.  The UC has a three-year  
          investment of $2 million per year for each of the 10 UC campuses  
          and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.










                                                                    AB 2664


                                                                    Page  4





          This measure calls for the appropriation of $22 million for  
          fiscal years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 inclusive, to be used  
          by the UC in order for the UC to expand the infrastructure  
          necessary to increase innovation and entrepreneurship for the   
          purpose of creating economic development for California.


          Purpose of this measure.  According to the author, in 2014,  
          active UC startups based in California employed over 19,000  
          Californians and brought in more than $14 billion in revenue.   
          The author contends that in order to maximize the transformative  
          power of UC's research engine, the UC innovation ecosystem needs  
          to expand throughout the State.  The author states, "The UC's  
          ability to provide entrepreneurial services is at capacity.  The  
          demand for startup seed funding is rising, and workspace demand  
          consistently exceeds capacity.  While UC-fostered  
          entrepreneurship is increasing, entrepreneurship in the state of  
          California is declining.  The number of new adults becoming  
          entrepreneurs per month slipped from a high of 440 out of every  
          100,000 Californian adults in 2012, to 390 in 2015; a troubling  
          trend as young companies are the primary source for all net new  
          jobs created annually."


          This measure seeks to build upon the successful model that the  
          state created in 2000. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Jeanice Warden / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960   
          FN: 0003243














                                                                    AB 2664


                                                                    Page  5