BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2678 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 11, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION Sebastian Ridley-Thomas, Chair AB 2678 (Gray) - As Introduced February 19, 2016 2/3 vote. Fiscal committee. SUBJECT: State designated fairs: funding SUMMARY: Requires taxable sales and purchases within a "state designated fair" to be segregated on the Sales and Use Tax (SUT) return and also mandates that 30% of the state's General Fund (3.9375%) SUT revenues derived from those segregated sales and purchases be deposited in the Fair and Exposition Fund (Fund). Specifically, this bill: 1)Provides that, for purposes of the SUT Law, the return shall segregate the seller's gross receipts and the property's sales price when the place of sale or use in this state is within a "state designated fair" or any real property of a "state designated fair" leased to another party. 2)Defines a "state designated fair" by reference to Business and Professions Code (B&PC) Sections 19418, 19418.1, 19418.2, and AB 2678 Page 2 19418.3. 3)Requires the State Board of Equalization (BOE) to develop a form for this purpose. 4)Provides that notwithstanding any provision of the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local SUT Law or the Transactions and Use Tax Law, this bill shall not apply to any tax levied by a county, city, or district pursuant to either of those laws. 5)Provides that, except as otherwise specified, 30% of all SUT revenues, less refunds and costs of administration, that were segregated shall be transferred to the Fund in the State Treasury. Specifically, the moneys shall be deposited into the separate account in the Fund specified in B&PC Section 19606.1. 6)Provides that any amounts deposited into the separate account shall be continuously appropriated and allocated as provided in B&PC Section 19606.1, except that any amounts transferred to the Fund pursuant to B&PC Section 19606.1(g) shall be allocated in accordance with B&PC Section 19620.2. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes the Fund. The Fund is charged with, among other things, allocating money to support the network of California fairs. 2)Requires certain license fees from satellite wagering to be deposited into a separate account in the Fund. These moneys are continuously appropriated for specified fair-related AB 2678 Page 3 purposes, including the payment of expenses incurred in establishing and operating satellite wagering facilities at fairs. 3)Defines a state designated fair as the California Exposition and State Fair in the City of Sacramento and those fairs specified in B&PC Sections 19418.1 (district agricultural associations), 19418.2 (county fairs), and 19418.3 (citrus fruit fairs) that may receive financial support or are otherwise governed by B&PC Section 19400 et seq. (governing horse racing). These fairs are also collectively referred to as the "network of California fairs." 4)Imposes a sales tax on retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property (TPP), absent a specific exemption. The tax is based upon the retailer's gross receipts from TPP sales in this state. 5)Imposes a complimentary use tax on the storage, use, or other consumption of TPP purchased out-of-state and brought into California. The use tax is imposed on the purchaser, and unless the purchaser pays the use tax to an out-of-state retailer registered to collect California's use tax, the purchaser remains liable for the tax. The use tax is set at the same rate as the state's sales tax and must generally be remitted to the BOE. FISCAL EFFECT: The BOE estimates that this bill would result in annual General Fund SUT losses of $20 million. COMMENTS: 1)The author has provided the following information in support of this bill: AB 2678 Page 4 AB 2678 will provide a stable and reliable source of funding for California's fairs and offer much needed help for specific fair-related purposes and projects on fairgrounds. Over the past 75 years, there has been a designated funding source for fairs from which the state has made significant investments in promoting the business operations and improving the infrastructure of California's fairs. Without state funding, these properties will continue to deteriorate and in their demise create public safety issues. The reality is that, through sales tax, the network of California fairs is currently a huge revenue generator for the state of California. Without funding to maintain the infrastructure, what were once valuable state assets may become state liabilities. 2)This bill is supported by the California Fair Network, which notes the following: Western Fairs Association and the California Fairs Alliance recognize that the California Fair Network is the only form of local government that does not receive a portion of the sales taxes generated on their property. More than 12 million Californians attend their hometown fair each year, creating jobs, tax income, and building community pride and harmony throughout the state. Additionally, another 20 million Californians attend non-fair events at fairgrounds each year, most with a non-profit or charitable element. As it currently stands, none of the resulting locally-generated dollars come back to assist fairgrounds with infrastructure or operating needs. 3)The BOE notes the following in its staff analysis of this AB 2678 Page 5 bill: a) Interim events are held on state designated fairgrounds : "In addition to the various annual fairs, other events held on the designated fairgrounds include motorized racing, craft fairs, doll shows, gun shows, home and garden shows, harvest festivals, farmers' markets, cultural festivals and concerts, motor home, RV, and boat shows, and more. Events may also include corporate events, private dinner parties, and wedding receptions. "According to the author's office, this bill's segregated reporting requirements are intended to apply to all events and activities that are held on the state designated fairgrounds. "Taxpayers making sales at events held on state designated fairgrounds would need to segregate these sales when filing their sales and use tax returns. Taxpayers who hold a seller's permit for a permanent place of business and who make sales both at events at state designated fairs and events held at other locations, would need to segregate those sales made at state designated fairs. BOE staff would need to know what events and activities occur at state designated fairs to instruct taxpayers to properly report their sales and purchases at these locations." b) California Exposition and State Fair (Cal Expo) hosts AB 2678 Page 6 private venues : "While Cal Expo hosts the annual California State Fair, it is also home to Bonney Field, a large sports and entertainment venue that includes food and beverage concessions and merchandise sales. Additionally, Raging Waters is a water park located within Cal Expo's grounds with dining and snack areas. However, it is not clear whether sales transactions made at Bonney Field or Raging Waters would be subject to the proposed segregation reporting requirements. Would these restaurants and snack areas be required to segregate their food and beverage sales? BOE staff can work with the author's office to better identify the events and activities that would be subject to the segregated reporting requirements in this bill." 4)Committee Staff Comments a) General background information : The author notes that, before 2009, license fees imposed on horse racing wagers were deposited in the Fund which, in addition to supporting the annual budget of the California Horse Racing Board, also supplemented the income of the network of California fairs. SB 16x2 (Ashburn), Chapter 12, Statutes of 2009, in turn, shifted the horse racing industry's obligation to fund fairs through license fees imposed on wagers to the General Fund. Specifically, SB 16x2 provided an annual continuous appropriation of $32 million from the General Fund to support the network of California fairs. This change was done as part of a package of measures designed to provide economic stimulus for the horse racing industry. The author's office notes that, in fiscal year 2011-12, AB 2678 Page 7 fair funding at the state level was eliminated as part of a package of budget cuts designed to address the state's ongoing financial crisis. The author notes, however, that the 2016-17 budget "currently contains a $3 million appropriation to support the network of California fairs and a $4 million allocation for infrastructure needs at fairgrounds." b) What would this bill do ? This bill requires taxable sales and purchases within a state designated fair to be segregated on the SUT return and also mandates that 30% of the state's General Fund (3.9375%) SUT revenues derived from these segregated sales and purchases be deposited in the Fund. Amounts deposited shall be continuously appropriated and allocated as provided in B&PC Section 19606.1. Section 19606.1, in turn, provides for the allocation of moneys for the following purposes: i) Servicing bonds issued for constructing or acquiring improvements at a fair's racetrack inclosure, satellite wagering facilities, health and safety repair projects, or handicapped access compliance projects at fairs; ii) For payment to the State Race Track Leasing Commission to be pledged for the repayment of debt necessary to construct a racetrack grandstand at the 22nd District Agricultural Association fairgrounds; iii) For the payment of expenses incurred in establishing and operating satellite wagering facilities at fairs; iv) For the support of an equipment and operating fund to produce and display a consolidated California signal at satellite wagering facilities and fairs; AB 2678 Page 8 v) For health and safety repair projects at fairs, including fire and life safety improvement projects, California Code of Regulations compliance projects, and long-term deferred maintenance projects; and, vi) For the development and payment of revenue generating projects, the establishment of pilot projects to restructure the current fair system, and for projects realizing a cost savings for more efficient utilization of existing fair resources. c) The benefits and perils of earmarking : Proponents of this bill might argue that earmarking specified SUT revenues would provide a stable and much-needed source of funding for state fairs. Opponents, however, might contend that the practice of earmarking restricts the Legislature's ability to fund vital state programs in a holistic manner through the annual budgetary process. Specifically, opponents might argue that this bill elevates specific fair funding needs above other vital programs designed to address basic human necessities, such as health and social services. In addition, this bill would potentially establish a precedent for future dedicated funding legislation. d) Suggested administrative amendment : This bill requires the BOE to develop a form to segregate sales and purchases of property sold or used at a state designated fair. The BOE notes, however, that the existing SUT return could be modified to add an additional line to report these transactions separately. In determining how best to implement this bill, BOE staff would like the option of either modifying the existing SUT return or creating a supplemental form to capture the required information. As AB 2678 Page 9 such, the BOE has suggested administrative amendments in its staff analysis to provide this flexibility. e) Potential amendments suggested by the Author : The Author's office has suggested two potential amendments to this bill. The first would add a five-year sunset date, to clarify that this funding mechanism is temporary and subject to future review by the Legislature. The second amendment would redirect segregated revenues for allocation under B&PC Section 19620.2, to clarify that the funds will be used for vital fair maintenance and infrastructure needs. f) Double referral : This bill has been double referred to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture. g) Legislative history : i) AB 700 (Krekorian), of the 2009-10 Regular Session, would have required 20% of the state's General Fund SUT revenues, remitted by specified taxpayers, be deposited into a newly established Creative Industries and Community Economic Revitalization Fund for specified purposes. AB 700 died in the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. ii) AB 1365 (Karnette), of the 2007-08 Regular Session, would have required all SUT revenues derived from the sale of art be allocated to the California Arts Council. AB 1365 was held in the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. AB 2678 Page 10 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Alameda County Fair Calaveras County Fair California Fair Network California Fairs Alliance California Mid-State Fair California State Association of Counties Contra Costa County Fair Del Norte County Fair Dixon May Fair Earl Warren Showgrounds AB 2678 Page 11 El Dorado County Fair Gold Country Fair Mariposa 35-A District Fairgrounds Nevada County Fairgrounds Placer County Fair Association Redwood Empire Fair Rural County Representatives of California San Mateo County Event Center Salinas Valley Fair Santa Barbara County Fair Silver Dollar Fair Siskiyou Golden Fairground Solano County Fair Association AB 2678 Page 12 Tulelake-Butte Valley Fair Sonoma-Marin Fair Ventura County Fair Western Fairs Association Yuba-Sutter Fair 7th District Agricultural Association, Monterey County Fair 19th District Agricultural District 26th District Agricultural Association 40th District Agricultural Association/Yolo County Fair 1 individual Opposition None on file AB 2678 Page 13 Analysis Prepared by:M. David Ruff / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098